TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
God damn that is a thick string, were you able to file the nut or did you have to replace it altogether?For 34” basses I buy custom .145 b strings. They seem to work well.
Yeah, I can get it if you're going for a different feel, but the music itself should be able to reflect that without changing the tuning. I mean it obviously is subjective but at the same time it's a commitment for everyone else in the band, usually more so than for the guitarist. I'm a singer too and it would be very boring if we tuned our Eb songs to Db, or even to B or no reason, the vocals would be all weird. I guess maybe your guitarist needs to get some perspective.You said it, "kinda stupid". Thats exactly the response he got from our second guitar player. And, it was right out of the blue without reason. A bunch of bands do this, that's fine. But, we have always played in standard tuning without it being an issue. Give me a reason for doing something and I'm all ears.
God damn that is a thick string, were you able to file the nut or did you have to replace it altogether?
There are trade-offs when you go to thicker strings90% of bassists have settled on .120-.130 and you'll probably find these are the best for you. It's a bass, not a guitar. So, you'll need to change you playing technique. You can't change the physics involved.
Yeah I get this, I've been playing a lot more bass and trying to find the specific style that fits me more. I find that playing with a pick is the sound I like more, even though jamming fingerstyle is fun too. It's not so much the floppiness in response to the pick that I don't like, but more so the floppy strings sounding more dead and dull. I also found that picking closer to the bridge gives me that resistance that I like from the thick strings on guitar.I'd like to point his one out again. I too come from a regular guitar background, where I like my strings thick, tight and heavy (.52 or .54 for the low E, depending on the scale), and fixed a bass for BEAD. Using a drop tuning set, I found 130 for the B too floppy. I bought a separate 135, hex core and all, but I still think it's floppy, especially compared to my guitars, and the thickness almost takes away some other playability factors. But it's a bass, not a guitar, so I changed my perspective and adjusted my technique. It matters where you pick or pluck, and how hard you hit the strings (and if it's necessary to play that hard with your fingers, or just dial the amp up). Look beyond the strings to find your new bass style, and don't port your guitar technique to bass.
Yeah fair enough. What I might do is get a set that's 60-80-100-125 and then try different B strings, as that is often the one that sounds off.If you’re one of those folks who likes a .110 E, a 145 B is the right diameter for a B with the same tension. It sounds big, but only because we’ve gotten accustomed to undersized B strings.
I'd try one if I got the chance, but aesthetically they're not my thing at all. And also, expensiveIf you get a chance to try a Dingwall, you will be amazed.
Yeah, it's cause they're multi-scale right? It makes a lot of sense in regards to intonation, giving all bass string saddles the same amount of adjustability makes no sense from an intonation standpoint, especially on bass I feel. But I still wouldn't get one cause I just don't like the look I guessDingwalls help a little with the string part of the equation - they allow a smaller B to work well, without penalizing you with longer strings on the high side.
Whst they also show is that it’s not the bass - a longer neck is more flexible/ floppier than a shorter one. Making the scale length longer doesn’t make the bass “better” - it’s a marginal fix for a string problem that should have never been a problem - if string makers had made sets with a well designed B string to start with, we wouldn’t have ended up with 35” scale 5’s.
Yeah, it's cause they're multi-scale right?
I think I'll try a 145 B like you recommended. I guess we'll see how well my bass handles that gauge and tension but hopefully I get a stiff feeling B string. And yeah, I do like 110 E, so maybe it makes more sense to go bigger than 130.Multi scale absolutely makes sense in a piano, where the open strings are covering 7 octaves. On a bass, the case for multi scale (assuming the strings are designed rationally) is not really that compelling - a 10% scale change is pretty marginal in terms of helping the Physics, and a major change ergonomically.
If you start from scratch, and design the entire system for optimal results for tension and ergonomics, a 34 inch scale with a good stiff neck, and the right strings makes the most sense. My 5’s are done this way, and there’s nothing second rate with how the B strings work.
I think I'll try a 145 B like you recommended. I guess we'll see how well my bass handles that gauge and tension but hopefully I get a stiff feeling B string. And yeah, I do like 110 E, so maybe it makes more sense to go bigger than 130.
Yeah alright, do you have any recommedations?a 130 is for people ( like me) who like low tension strings - my E’s are 95’s, and a 130 B is the right gauge for a good tension match.
You may have to try a few different 145’s - big strings have to be wound just right - if they’re not done well , they can be dull sounding.
God damn that is a thick string, were you able to file the nut or did you have to replace it altogether?
I’ve tried the .115/.095/.075/.055 DR DDT set for BEAD and it works but the .115 is noticeably lower tension than the rest.Thanks for all the responses!
After reading everything I'm looking at two different sets, one of which being a DR DDT as a couple of you have mentioned. That one is 55-115, and I'm thinking that if it's designed to be tuned low, then maybe a 115 low B will work. There is also a 65-125 DDT so I'm still not sure.
The other set is one I found on thomann designed for low b by strandberg, which is a 65-130, where the 130 string is taper wound, which after reading a bit seems like it could be beneficial for retaining tension at a lower tuning, although people seem to have very differing opinions on this as well.
I would love to try lots of strings and sets but I'm not really finacially at a place where I can buy multiple sets and try them all haha. I get that all of this is preference and the real answer is that I will find out what works best after trying different sets, it took be about two years of playing guitar before I finally found the set I'm most comfortable with.
Any thoughts on the sets?
Yeah alright, do you have any recommedations?
If anything, “floppy” strings (and I prefer what most would consider “floppy”; more on that in a minute) should add some rattle and clank that would help with definition (though not necessarily intonation). I doubt it was the low tension of the strings that gave you a “dead and dull” sound; much more likely, the strings were either dead (worn out) or duds (defective out of the package).Yeah I get this, I've been playing a lot more bass and trying to find the specific style that fits me more. I find that playing with a pick is the sound I like more, even though jamming fingerstyle is fun too. It's not so much the floppiness in response to the pick that I don't like, but more so the floppy strings sounding more dead and dull. I also found that picking closer to the bridge gives me that resistance that I like from the thick strings on guitar.