• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Strings on Pre-CBS Fender Bass

So, Fender markets some 'original nickel' wounds (sorry, I forget the exact name). When did Fender change to nickel-wounds as OEM, or did they? I remember new Fenders in 70's in the stores didn't have flats . . . .
 
When Leo’s Pre-CBS models rolled off of the factory floor, they had flatwounds.

But were they Fender flats? Another brand? With the green silk that today’s Fender flats come with?

Sorry if this is repeat thread, couldn’t find anything.
Pre-CBS strings on my '65 Fender Jazz (bought used in '66) were the Fender's own brand of flat-wounds. In the early 70's I changed to Fender black Tape-Wound strings. But Fender's own brand of flat-wound strings came with them.
 
V.C. Squier was the OEM string company who worked for Fender in its early years. Then three people from that company founded their own company in 1964, now known as GHS.

The Fender Flats of today, made by D'Addario, are nothing like the original Fender Flats. It is my understanding that GHS Precision Flats are probably the closest thing to the original Fender Flats.

That's interesting! I actually prefer, by far, the new Fender flats on my old P-bass to the GHS flats.
 
I don't think you need a lot of evidence to prove that Leo would have thought of his new instrument to be the replacement for...everything that existed until then.
No, no. You miss the point entirely. Leo Fender's brand new Precision Electric Bass Guitar wasn't a replacement for anything. It super seceded and super abounded anything that ever came before, or since. It is his life's crowning achievement and his ultimate claim to fame. The ultimate invention from the ultimate musical instrument inventor.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Andy Daventry
No, no. You miss the point entirely. Leo Fender's brand new Precision Electric Bass Guitar wasn't a replacement for anything. It super seceded and super abounded anything that ever came before, or since.

I haven't missed a thing. Viewed from the perspective of 2020, your statement makes sense, but in 1951, I'm sure it didn't look that way at all. We're not talking about what happened over the ensuing decades, we're talking about what his intent was at the time - it was to replace the upright bass with something louder, more portable, and more guitarist friendly.
 
I'd like to see and read your sources for your statements. I have a pretty good library of books about all things Fender, and have never read a Leo Fender quote to that effect. I'll go back and look to see If I can find anything.
Escape From the Dog House: Fender's Bass Revolution and The Early Days Of The Fender Precision Bass | Disc Makers Blog are quick references, and the book The Fender Bass, which I have had for many years, also discusses the adaptability to both double bass players and to guitarists doubling gigs.
 
Last edited:
I'd like to see and read your sources for your statements. I have a pretty good library of books about all things Fender, and have never read a Leo Fender quote to that effect. I'll go back and look to see If I can find anything.
“Seeing” a source for iiipopes statement is to take a look at an old Fender bass or pictures of one, no actual reading required. The P bass did have phenolic / composite bridge saddles and it did have muting material under the bridge cover, there is no question about that. Those two items clearly indicate Leo was interested in quick decay / no sustain, with the mute being the most obvious indication.
I would call Leo’s invention a substitute for upright bass, but not necessarily a replacement. There was, and still is, a place for upright bass in a lot of musical applications, but obviously Leo’s invention is used more often & in more circumstances. I think it’s safe to say Leo was looking to develop an alternative to upright bass for multiple reasons.
 
Last edited:
As the only basses in existence in popular bands of the day (save half a dozen from Mr Tutmarc) were uprights, I don't think you need a lot of evidence to prove that Leo would have thought of his new instrument to be the replacement for...everything that existed until then. How many sources would you need to believe that Henry Ford wanted his model T to replace a horse drawn carriage?

Here's one more anyway:

Escape From the Dog House: Fender's Bass Revolution

Yup

I haven't missed a thing. Viewed from the perspective of 2020, your statement makes sense, but in 1951, I'm sure it didn't look that way at all. We're not talking about what happened over the ensuing decades, we're talking about what his intent was at the time - it was to replace the upright bass with something louder, more portable, and more guitarist friendly.

Exactly

Escape From the Dog House: Fender's Bass Revolution and The Early Days Of The Fender Precision Bass | Disc Makers Blog are quick references, and the book The Fender Bass, which I have had for many years, also discusses the adaptability to both double bass players and to guitarists doubling gigs.

Spot on
 
“Seeing” a source for iiipopes statement is to take a look at an old Fender bass or pictures of one, no actual reading required. The P bass did have phenolic / composite bridge saddles and it did have muting material under the bridge cover, there is no question about that. Those two items clearly indicate Leo was interested in quick decay / no sustain, with the mute being the most obvious indication.
I would call Leo’s invention a substitute for upright bass, but not necessarily a replacement. There was, and still is, a place for upright bass in a lot of musical applications, but obviously Leo’s invention is used more often & in more music circumstances.

THIS.

There was a completely stock 51/52’ P 5at came thru The Horn Trader in OKC off of Western, round 2003. And I mean WITH original strings/mute. Played hard, worn, stashed for the next few decades.

Bruce gave me 5 minutes, through a SS Ampeg combo ...

I was doing unamplified, Lenzer gutstrung upright with some guys around that time. That ol’ P was THAT sound, but way louder, and with way more authority.

It gave me a small glimpse of what a shocker/blessing that must have been for doghouse slingers back then.
 
As a purchaser of a new pre-CBS bass (yeah, I'm old :D) I can tell you they were flats as were all the Fender guitar strings. You couldn't get that surf guitar sound (with reverb) using round-wounds. They were Fender strings as mentioned and they had blue silk. I remember buying new Fender branded strings (didn't change them often) and they were the same as what came with the bass.
 
That's interesting! I actually prefer, by far, the new Fender flats on my old P-bass to the GHS flats.
Yes, but taking into account the variables of what core and wrap wire were available at the time, and the settings of the tension of the winding machines and other variables, to my ears, the original V C Squier strings had an organic woodiness that has not been emulated, duplicated, or adapted since. To my ears, GHS are dark and a little quirky, La Bellas are smooth and consistent, new Fenders have subdued growl, D'Addarios are zing quickly to thump, EB stainless flats a little more subdued than the Fenders, and the rest of them like darts in a round spectrum at various points near or far to the strings mentioned. But none are like the original V C Squier/Fender flats.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Yahboy and FranF
I believe V.C. Squier strings also made round wounds strings as well. I think those round wound strings were used on Danelectro Longhorn basses. The sound John Entwistle missed and approached James Howe to experiment with gauges to get the best sounding round wounds.
But I could be wrong :)
 
I don't have sources to hand, but I'm sure guitar strings were made as both flatwounds and roundwounds at the time Fender brought their bass to the market. Flatwounds were considered a premium option in guitar strings, and were the standard for steel strings for bowed instruments (Since Thomastik introduced them earlier in the 20th century) so it's likely that Fender would have had to specify which construction they wanted when having strings made for their new bass.
 
They original Fender Strings, were fat, flat and stiff. ... And I wouldn't recommend them. ... I still have a 1966 Kent flatwounds in their original package that I wouldn't use. ... The new flats and much better so, use them. ... My preference are TI Flats and Labella Low Tensions. ...
 
  • Like
Reactions: Yahboy and nixdad
Pre-CBS strings on my '65 Fender Jazz (bought used in '66) were the Fender's own brand of flat-wounds. In the early 70's I changed to Fender black Tape-Wound strings. But Fender's own brand of flat-wound strings came with them.
I had bought a near-mint '65 Jazz and near-mint Ampeg B-15 (with JBL upgrade) from the original owner in 1990. These strings were in the case:
IMG_0163.jpg


They original Fender Strings, were fat, flat and stiff. ... And I wouldn't recommend them. ... I still have a 1966 Kent flatwounds in their original package that I wouldn't use. ... The new flats and much better so, use them. ... My preference are TI Flats and Labella Low Tensions. ...
Yep - I love the TI Flats and use them on 3 of my basses today.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DJ Bebop