• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Studio Headphones.

Just bought a set of Shure 840A's. Comfortable [especially w/ the extra thicker pads I bought, see link below], it delivers a neutral bass tone [not to much not to little], and like the detachable cord [even if is proprietary].

I've been following your journey w/ the other brands and look forward to your thoughts.
Should I decide to keep the Audio Technica, I'll get new pads for it and already did a little research in that direction - but I have a feeling that the Shures will deliver what I'm looking for.
 
As an Amazon Associate, TalkBass may receive commissions from qualifying purchases made via links on this site.
  • Like
Reactions: 2saddleslab
Those people at Thomann really have their shipping sorted out. I ordered the Shure 840A yesterday, early afternoon, after talking to them on the phone.
Now, less than 24 hours later, I'm having them on my head.

While we are both based in Germany, and it's not that big of a country, Thomann is based in the southern parts while I can literally see Denmark on a clear day, and by car, it's an 8 hour ride.


Very first impression on the Shure: While it looks quite big, it's actually pretty light. The ear pieces are slightly bigger than on the Audio Technica.
Comfort on my head after 20 minutes is great. My ears are slighly warm, especially the areas where they touch. The padding is excellent. The headband could be a bit better, but the low weight of the cans make that less of an issue.
It surely is one of the most comfortable pair of cans of the lot I tried, along with the Behringers.
They are easy to drive, and have a good build quality. I would rank them higher than the Audio Technicas. Both come with detachable cables, both with proprietary headphone plug, but the misers in Shure HQ only included a straight 3m cable. I knew that beforehand and ordered a coiled cable along with them. The attachment for the cable is angled on the Shures so the cable does not point straight towards your shoulder and the cable sleeve is very smooth, so I can't hear any unwanted friction noise when it rubs at my clothing.
So far, so good. The sound is, yet again, V shaped. I think that I'm getting somewhat of a dip in the lower mids or upper bass registers, but I'll have to listen some more to confirm that. I was mainly wearing them while doing office work, where the main focus was on getting the work done, so I cannot say too much about them yet. There is a fair amount of treble, and I need to check if that's just bloated upper registers or very high resolution.
All I can say right now is that I'm not not liking them and that they are a lot more comfy on my head than the ATH-M50X.

I might want to try the Sennheiser HD-300, though.
 
Those people at Thomann really have their shipping sorted out. I ordered the Shure 840A yesterday, early afternoon, after talking to them on the phone.
Now, less than 24 hours later, I'm having them on my head.

While we are both based in Germany, and it's not that big of a country, Thomann is based in the southern parts while I can literally see Denmark on a clear day, and by car, it's an 8 hour ride.


Very first impression on the Shure: While it looks quite big, it's actually pretty light. The ear pieces are slightly bigger than on the Audio Technica.
Comfort on my head after 20 minutes is great. My ears are slighly warm, especially the areas where they touch. The padding is excellent. The headband could be a bit better, but the low weight of the cans make that less of an issue.
It surely is one of the most comfortable pair of cans of the lot I tried, along with the Behringers.
They are easy to drive, and have a good build quality. I would rank them higher than the Audio Technicas. Both come with detachable cables, both with proprietary headphone plug, but the misers in Shure HQ only included a straight 3m cable. I knew that beforehand and ordered a coiled cable along with them. The attachment for the cable is angled on the Shures so the cable does not point straight towards your shoulder and the cable sleeve is very smooth, so I can't hear any unwanted friction noise when it rubs at my clothing.
So far, so good. The sound is, yet again, V shaped. I think that I'm getting somewhat of a dip in the lower mids or upper bass registers, but I'll have to listen some more to confirm that. I was mainly wearing them while doing office work, where the main focus was on getting the work done, so I cannot say too much about them yet. There is a fair amount of treble, and I need to check if that's just bloated upper registers or very high resolution.
All I can say right now is that I'm not not liking them and that they are a lot more comfy on my head than the ATH-M50X.

I might want to try the Sennheiser HD-300, though.
Even comfier w/ the thicker replacement ear pads I linked earlier. They also seem to breathe a bit more during longer sessions.
 
WhatsApp Image 2026-03-21 at 12.31.47.jpeg

Shure 840A vs. Audio Technica ATH-M50X.
Even though the Shure cans are a fair bit larger, they actually weigh a few grams less. The headband has a better cushioning, but it is formed in a way that there is only a slim contact point on the very top of my head, which gets a bit irritating after about half an hour. Also, I do think that I'd like to set them one or two notches bigger than they actually go, they sit a bit too high on my ears.

In direct comparison with the Audio Technica, they are more comfy, but once again, taking them home and A/B testing them against the 650, the 650 is so much better on my head.

Listening to the Shures, my feelings remain neutral.
There is enough bass, maybe slightly elevated, but without feeling bloated.
The midrange is there, but it somehow feels like it was added as an afterthought, and it also feels like there is not much resolution in there.
I feel like I can apply the acoustic magnifying glass to anything below 150Hz and above 1,5kHz. I can hear the details of how the drummer uses the hihats.
I can dissect the lower bass and kick drum, but in the area that actually matters, it's a bit ... I don't want to say mushy, but it feels like it's neither fun nor analytical.
vaxfvdcwbq231.jpg
 
Okay, this is the last round of testing.

I had the AKG 371 on my head for a minute to confirm: Bass tends to get a bit distorted when you overdo it, sub bass is overly present, but upper lacks. Furthermore, I don't understand how they play, therefore I cannot translate how the headphone sound will translate to other devices.

Revisiting the Audio Technica ATH-M50X, the first thing I notice is how small the cups are. My ears don't want to fit in there. Aftermarket cups would be an option, but also, the headband is not really to my head's liking, and in this current lot, they feel like they have the cheapest production quality, and it's not even close. I could live with their sound, even though I think the elevated bass is not exactly where it should be, but the treble is good.

Shure 840A: I cannot say how the fact that these are much too small for my head has eluded me for so long. Also, the headband only rests on the dome of my head in a narrow spot that gets sore over time. The sound, to my ear, is still somewhere between okay and meh.

Sennheiser HD300 Pro. I must admit that I fell in the same trap as many others might have. I look at the 280 Pro, see you can find one on sale for 80 bucks at any given moment and the 300 retails at 199. Twice the price for what? A small increment in numbers (280 and 300 are not that far apart)?
But it's a different headphone. It folds down smaller, has bigger cups, less clamping force and rests on my head where it should, even after an hour. The Sennheiser typical cushions that bring the load to sit on two points instead of one are simply what my head prefers.
Soundwise, they are stoic, sturdy and without hype. That is, when you are like me and the main means of listening to music are either a pair of HD-650 or a set of Neumann Studio monitors and a flat response feels normal. When you come from V shaped cans, the mids could feel a bit forward at first - because there is little to no scoop going on, at least in the mid frequencies that matter to me.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 31HZ
Of course there's stuff to rant about.

1. Cable. Yes, the HD-300 Pro has a replaceable cable. But the connector is not 1/8" or 2.5mm, or mini XLR. It's some weird 8 pin that looks more like a printer cable something to put in a headphone. Sennheiser offers replacement - but only the exact same model. A straight, 1.5m cable with four coils to reduce cable noise.

2. "Case Candy": You get a cardboard box with the phones inside and that's is. 1/8" connector with a screw on 1/4" adapter. No carrying bag, no spare cables, nothing else. I've tested quite a few cans in the $99-$199 range now, and the Sennies are not only among the more expensive ones, but the misers at Sennheiser HQ packed literally nothing else in the bag. I thought the Shure was bad in that regard, with only one cable and a cheap'ish feeling pouch for transportation, but the Sennheiser easily qualifies as the poorest in that regard. I mean, when you include a hinge in your design that lets them fold up in a form factor that's easy to transport, plus put in 64 Ohm drivers that don't require powerful hardware to drive them, then you're kind of expecting people to make use of that and use them on the go, one would assume.


BUT. Out of everything I tried, these are the ones that have both a comfort on my head and a sound profile that I can live with. I can wear them for more than an hour without sour spots forming anywhere on my head. Not as perfect of a fit as the 650s are, but good enough. My ears feel like they are in a larger space than they actually are and there is some perceived distance between the instruments and ears. They are closed cans, so they don't have the room to work with, but they feel not as restricted as some others do.
Vastly important for me, they have the midrange, and it's crisp. They are analytical enough to dissect a mix. Important for me is that the drums feel snappy and crisp, which they do, and fed with bass, they do bass.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TomB
I stand corrected.
The Sennheiser HD 300 Pro is a good headphone for many an application, but it kinda sucks to play bass in my home environment.
I did perform several tests, but did not have the chance to properly sit down and play bass while wearing them and made up my mind too quickly. They worked great for drums and I assumed that they'll be just as good for bass.
When I finally sat down and plugged them into my system, my first thought was that something in my signal chain is off. I had family visiting and one of them is a bass player, too and they used my gear for a bit, so I thought some EQ is off. There was too much high mid and treble content, it kinda felt like there was a high pass filter set to 200Hz or something going on. After checking everything in the signal chain, I tested the signal through my FOH system and got the usual bass heavy sound, rich and full. I fetched the HD 650 from the other room, plugged that in and it was back to normal. So I took the 300 again, and had the same result. Finger noise and fret clank seemed amplified and it sounded like playing through a 2.1 system when you forgot to switch on the sub.

Bummer. I would have wanted to like them - even though that cable IS annoying.


Well, the solution was not that far away. I'm based in Germany and our little neighbor to the south once had a great headphone company in Vienna.
The Akustische und Kinogeräte Gesellschaft mbH, or short "AKG". AKG was sold to Harman, and when Harman was taken over by Samsung in 2016, they closed down the HQ in Austria. A rather large group of people found themselves without a job, but with the required know how and access to the means of production for making audio gear. They did not sit idle, but took their severance pay checks and founded Austrian Audio, starting off with microphones but soon after started introducing headphones. The Hi-X 65 was their first open back model, released early 2021 and later that year, with the model name Hi-X 60, the closed back version hit the markets.

AA_TIC_0608_Color-129_websize.jpg


I tried these out - because I've been curious about Austrian Audio for a while now and because I am running out of options.

The unboxing event felt good. High quality packaging, and within the box, a 1.2m and a 3.0m cable (so they are detachable - of the 2.5mm bayonet variety). The cables end in 1/8" jacks with a screw on 1/4" adapter included. There's also a pouch for transport included. In the AA accessory shop, there's a hard case and I would have wished this included - with a MSRP of €349 that's not unreasonable I'd venture.

The ear cups and headband have memory foam inside, and that stuff really earns the name. Indent it with your finger and it stays a while in that shape before returning. It's stiff, but just the right amount of stiffness - and I guess that it mellows down a bit with wear. The ear cups are topped with what I assume is faux leather - I'll see how long that will last. AA offers replacement parts for almost everything on the headphones, so that's not that much of an issue. I generally prefer a softer surface for the ear cups, but this one feels very good on the head.
It's reasonably light and well balanced. The weight is distributed between the surprisingly low clamping force and the very well designed head band - even after hours it's still comfy on my head. Only the Beyerdynamics and the Sennheisers did that. It does not feel like it sits very tight, but has a good seal and even when I was grooving and bobbing my head while playing bass, they stayed in place.

So in terms of ergonomics, they are up there with the best.

In terms of build quality, I'd say they are up there, too. The mix of plastic and metal is well chosen and the plastic bits feel expensive.

I would ask for a coiled cable, that would be great - but I'd wager that I can probably use a different brand that also uses one of the 2.5mm jack bayonet models for their headphones.

Now let's finally look at the sound.

In reviews, people call them analytical, uncolored, and therefore boring. I agree on the analytical and uncolored bits, but that's exciting in my book.
When I'm wearing them, they really feel like they have a nearly flat response, and the resolution is 8K UHD. I can really zoom in on a single instrument and have the feeling that I'm hearing every single nuance of that instrument while the rest of the production takes a step into the background. There is no frequency area where they feel weak. Yes, they don't have a bass boost going on and when you're coming from a set of Beats By Dr. Dre headcans, you'll think there's no bass. But half an hour in, I swapped them for my 650 and suddenly the 650 sounded bassy and muffled.
That was a shocking experience, because none of the headphones I tried managed to alter my perception of the 650. It always felt like coming home when I put on my good old Sennies. Back to where everything is like it is supposed to be. It took a few minutes and the Sennies sounded normal again, and when I swapped back to the AA, they felt a bit trebly and shrill. I could repeat that cycle at leisure - five minutes in my ears adjusted and whatever cans I was wearing felt normal, swapping from AA to Sennheiser, the Sennheiser felt muffled, and vice versa the AA felt shrill.

The confinement of a closed back with its advantages and drawbacks is of course a given, but the AA feels like it has a wider stage than it should have. It's (of course) not as open as an open back, but it is the most open sounding closed back I ever tried. When you put them on without playing music, you get the typical feeling of being in a capsule. When you play something, the audio source seems to be a bigger distance from you than the capsule walls, and the result is that you're feeling like you're in a room that is a bit smaller than the actual room you're in, but a lot larger than the capsule - if that makes any sense.

From my (current) point of view, the Austrian Audio Hi-X 60 is the headphone I've been looking for.
It excels at those tasks the 650 does not, and does everything I was asking for:
-closed back with decent isolation and no bleed.
-folds up for easy transport
-can be driven from weak sources (110 dB SPL/V | 25 Ohms)

While offering a resolution and listening experience that can hold its own against what the 650 deliver,
but also bringing its own, distinct flavor to the table. Where the 650 is warm and mellow, this one is a bit colder and more direct.
 
Thank you for sharing your detailed and well-described findings. You inspired me to get off my butt and replace my disintegrating Senn HD 180’s. For open back, I’m very happy with the Beyer DT990, and have been for some time. So it was easy for me to order the Beyer DT 770’s as a step up for closed-back, and so I did …not as big a step up as yours, but I’m very happy at the $200 level. Thanks again!
 
  • Like
Reactions: el murdoque
I love boring, uncolored headphones! Glad you found your match.
It's incredible how far opinions about headphones differ.
However, when you strap two tiny cups to your ears, with said ears filling out much of the inside space - ear size and form might affect how that tiny room works acoustically in no small way. That, and personal taste, I guess.
I mean, is a headphone flat when it's measuring a flat line or is it flat when it's true to the Harman curve - or to some other curve that has been calculated to make them sound flat?
Will a headphone that sounds totally flat on your head sound the same on mine?

I think, that from a producer / mixer's point of view, all you can do is to create a mental image with several tracks, by listening to them until you know them inside and out, and then listening to them on a variety of gear - well calibrated studio monitors in a treated room, hifi systems, FOH systems, several headphones and whatever else you can get your hands on - and then use that mental image as a template to find how the headphones you're currently using compare to that. Every headphone will lie to you, and the trick is to get to know them and their style, so you know what to expect.
The bass sounds a little thin? No problem on a pair of cans with less than Harman bass response, big problem on a pair of Beats.

It's interesting to see that those headphones that get referred to "This is a studio standard, it found in thousands of studios across the world",
like the Beyer 770 / 990, the Sennheiser 600 / 650 the Sony V6 / 7506 and of course the AKG K240, have been around for a while now - the Senneiser being the youngest, introduced in the late 90's. It shows that a pair of cans that was considered a good tool 25 years ago seems to hold up to the test of time.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Motown971 and TomB
For tracking, I'll use a cheap set of Tascams or my 7hz Timeless IEM's. For mixing, I'll use a set of krk 8400's with RealPhones.... but not for anything critical.... rough levels and panning...... but then I'm out and monitoring with an old set of krk vst 4's and the occasional low-end check with a krk sub. I love those old monitors.... because I know them, and not because they are the best thing since sliced bread..... its the same with cans.... knowing them and how they translate is key.
 
The AKG K-731 will have to go straight to the pile of Headphones that I frankly don't understand at all.

Here's the good about it:
-Detachable cable and it comes with options. Also, the cable has mini-XLR, so replacements are not hard to get.
-They fold up - but instead of folding, they swivel. I can set the size to suit my head and then swivel them for transport without that setting being messed up.
-Relatively easy to drive - my tablet gets them loud enough for critical listening

The neutral:
-I don't have a single sweet spot position on my head and can push them around a fair bit.

The weird:
-While they don't shy away from bass and also don't feel that bloated, the kick drum in the tracks I listened to is MIGHTY, while the synth bass that goes low feels a bit weak. Drums in general sound quite good and extremely punchy - by that I mean kick, snare and toms, as well as percussion. Cymbals feel underrepresented against that power, a lot of sizzle, but no body - especially the ride.

The bad:
They are not really comfy, so I have to push them forth and back on my head to find a position that is not sore yet.
There is, yet again a hole in the mids. Or to my ear, there's two, lower and upper. Voices sound okay, but bass has all the foundation, but lacks that bit between the low rumble and the definition. Body? Driven guitars also lack weight, even though they have all the presence.
It's the same experience I had with the Beyerdynamics. I seem to experience one pair of headphones with a V shape as having elevated bass and treble, while another feels like it has a hole in the middle. This AKG feels like instead of one hole in the middle, there are two smaller ones.

Great sub, good lower bass, not so good upper bass, holes in the mids, and the top end is all there, well represented and I want to say neutral and analytical without sounding sharp.
These feel like someone either took a pair of studio headphones with a neutral and critical response and tweaked them more towards fun listening,
or someone took a pair of fun-colored headphones and tweaked them towards neutral studio ones - in any case, the result is stranded in the middle.
Not fun enough for fun, and not neutral enough for professional listening.

I'm listening to tracks I've listened to a thousand times, from the car stereo to the mobile phone speaker, studio monitors, bluetooth speakers, HiFi system, extremely expensive HiFi system, FOH systems and a ton of different headphones - and I feel myself unable to sort them into any kind of category.

The closest I come to describe the sound would be that you spent a ton of money on a pair of double 18" subs and the necessary power amps,
and then found yourself unable to afford the rest and went with a pair of 10" tops - good ones, mind you, but it's hopeless to bridge the gap, and therefore, most of your midrange is gone. Some of those frequencies sound extremely crisp, punchy and direct, but some absolutely do not.

Slow played song parts with heavily driven guitars and hard hit drums that are meant to groove are a lot of fun, though.
FWIW, I experienced a lot of the frequency response anomalies you're reporting when I compared my wired and wireless headphones.

That was before I was fitted with hearing aids: some of the EQ "challenges" moved, and others were eliminated after I got my hearing aids.

Have you seen an audiologist lately?
 
Have you seen an audiologist lately?
Yes, I have. My hearing is fine up to 17,5kHz - which came as a surprise both to me and the audiologist because I am in my forties and spent my youth playing loud music and visiting concerts and only started treating my hearing as the priceless and fragile thing it is in my thirties.
They ran several tests and not only told me that my hearing is fine, they said it's way above average for my age.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jazzdogg
Acoustic in my little home studio are horrible. To fix that would cost thousands, if it is even fixable. So I went looking for mixing headphones, and listened to a bunch of them. Please bear in mind that everybody's ears are different, and the way our brain interpret sound is also different from individual to individual, so my findings will NOT match yours,

The first pair I tried were the Audeze MM100. Wow, what a sonic revelation. Those sounded the least headphony(is that a word?) I've ever heard, really sounded like a pair of great quality speakers in a great sounding room. Unfortunately, they are also very heavy, and the material composing the pads made the side of my head and ears instantly sweaty. As great as they sound, I'd never wear them.

Beyerdynamics DT 770 pro. Not for me, not by a long shot. They sounded... annoying to me. They seem to have this thing in the way they present the high mid that is really grating to my ears. YMMV

Sennheiser HD600. A classic, but unfortunately they sounded a bit muffled to me. Upon critical listening I realized they were not, all the details were there, but the way they presented the low mids to me made everything sound a bit dull. Comfortable thought.

Sennheiser HD490 pro. Those are the most comfortable headphone I even donned on my head by a long shot, so light and well fitting, they disappear entirely as in: I forget I'm wearing them. And the sound doesn't disappoint, well balanced, very detailed, not too dull nor too exciting, sound almost as good as the Audeze(no, not quite).

Audio Technica ATH-M50x. We all know how those sound. I had a pair about 15 years ago, they, of course, broke after a few months, I just looked them over to see if the quality improved or not. It did not, if anything they feel worst. Pass.

I'm waiting for them to receive the Adam H200 of which I've read good reviews, and I'd also would try some of Austrian Audio's but they had no demo at the time. So far it looks like I will end up with the 490's thought.
 
  • Like
Reactions: eaglemachine
Acoustic in my little home studio are horrible. To fix that would cost thousands, if it is even fixable. So I went looking for mixing headphones, and listened to a bunch of them. Please bear in mind that everybody's ears are different, and the way our brain interpret sound is also different from individual to individual, so my findings will NOT match yours,

The first pair I tried were the Audeze MM100. Wow, what a sonic revelation. Those sounded the least headphony(is that a word?) I've ever heard, really sounded like a pair of great quality speakers in a great sounding room. Unfortunately, they are also very heavy, and the material composing the pads made the side of my head and ears instantly sweaty. As great as they sound, I'd never wear them.

Beyerdynamics DT 770 pro. Not for me, not by a long shot. They sounded... annoying to me. They seem to have this thing in the way they present the high mid that is really grating to my ears. YMMV

Sennheiser HD600. A classic, but unfortunately they sounded a bit muffled to me. Upon critical listening I realized they were not, all the details were there, but the way they presented the low mids to me made everything sound a bit dull. Comfortable thought.

Sennheiser HD490 pro. Those are the most comfortable headphone I even donned on my head by a long shot, so light and well fitting, they disappear entirely as in: I forget I'm wearing them. And the sound doesn't disappoint, well balanced, very detailed, not too dull nor too exciting, sound almost as good as the Audeze(no, not quite).

Audio Technica ATH-M50x. We all know how those sound. I had a pair about 15 years ago, they, of course, broke after a few months, I just looked them over to see if the quality improved or not. It did not, if anything they feel worst. Pass.

I'm waiting for them to receive the Adam H200 of which I've read good reviews, and I'd also would try some of Austrian Audio's but they had no demo at the time. So far it looks like I will end up with the 490's thought.
I agree on the ATH-M50x and on the 770 pro. The HD600 has the Sennheiser-Veil (TM) draped over the top end and I do agree that while the information is all there, it's not a good idea to mix treble content wearing them, it feels a little numb. I personally get a good representation by listening with both my HD650 and my Austrians, because the latter are, in direct comparison, much harsher in the top end. If it sounds fine on the 650, I try with the Austrian to see if the treble sounds fine there, too.

I do think that when mixing with headphones, it is a good idea to use more than one pair - or to be really really familiar with the one you're using.
 
I agree on the ATH-M50x and on the 770 pro. The HD600 has the Sennheiser-Veil (TM) draped over the top end and I do agree that while the information is all there, it's not a good idea to mix treble content wearing them, it feels a little numb. I personally get a good representation by listening with both my HD650 and my Austrians, because the latter are, in direct comparison, much harsher in the top end. If it sounds fine on the 650, I try with the Austrian to see if the treble sounds fine there, too.

I do think that when mixing with headphones, it is a good idea to use more than one pair - or to be really really familiar with the one you're using.
I currently have a pair of Sony's MDR-7506 and AKG K240s. The Sony's have a way of presenting vocals which brings them forward and sweet sounding at the same time, which means I don't have to make a special mix for tracking vocals, singers love them. I understand why they're used in the broadcast industry the world over. Unfortunately, if I mix using those and then listen on other system, the vocals tend to be buried.

The k240s I own are the current one, not the high impedance one's of old of which I used to own and remember them sounding very good. While the new one retain the very good transient response of the old one's, which make them very good for tracking instruments with sharp attack, they don't have the same level of details and balance. If I mix using those the high tend to sound harsh when listening on other system. They are very good for setting compressors though as, somehow, a compressor who start to pump is instantly obvious when listening on those cans.

As to my room, it is a bass sinkhole somehow(how ironic for a bass player). I have a pair of Adam T7V, I turned on the bass boost in the back, yet I hear no bass. You can guess as to how my mix sound if I mix without checking on other device. I thought about getting a sub, but good ones are expensive, and I'm not even sure it would solve this particular problem.

The obvious is to get a good set of cans. But, as you may know, it is a bit more complicated than it sound. Everybody's ears are shaped differently, which will not only affect comfort, but also sound stage. Case in point, the Beyerdynamics which a lot of people love and swear by, while for others they sound awful. Which means you cannot rely on reviews only, you really have to try them on for yourself, and listen to material you already know very well.

And sure, the old advice of checking your mix in the car still apply.
 
  • Like
Reactions: el murdoque
I currently have a pair of Sony's MDR-7506 and AKG K240s. The Sony's have a way of presenting vocals which brings them forward and sweet sounding at the same time, which means I don't have to make a special mix for tracking vocals, singers love them. I understand why they're used in the broadcast industry the world over. Unfortunately, if I mix using those and then listen on other system, the vocals tend to be buried.

The k240s I own are the current one, not the high impedance one's of old of which I used to own and remember them sounding very good. While the new one retain the very good transient response of the old one's, which make them very good for tracking instruments with sharp attack, they don't have the same level of details and balance. If I mix using those the high tend to sound harsh when listening on other system. They are very good for setting compressors though as, somehow, a compressor who start to pump is instantly obvious when listening on those cans.

As to my room, it is a bass sinkhole somehow(how ironic for a bass player). I have a pair of Adam T7V, I turned on the bass boost in the back, yet I hear no bass. You can guess as to how my mix sound if I mix without checking on other device. I thought about getting a sub, but good ones are expensive, and I'm not even sure it would solve this particular problem.

The obvious is to get a good set of cans. But, as you may know, it is a bit more complicated than it sound. Everybody's ears are shaped differently, which will not only affect comfort, but also sound stage. Case in point, the Beyerdynamics which a lot of people love and swear by, while for others they sound awful. Which means you cannot rely on reviews only, you really have to try them on for yourself, and listen to material you already know very well.

And sure, the old advice of checking your mix in the car still apply.

See, you're already halfway there because you know your headphones and monitors and how they sound.

I do check mixes on my headphones and Neumann Monitors first, before going to consumer grade stuff.
Laptop speakers, Sonos Play:1, car stereo, whatever is at hand.
I also run a mix through my living room PA setup (it's a 10" sub with 4.5" satellites. Small, but much too big for the required SPL in the room) to check how the bass works out.

Mixing is, and remains, an art - and for each device you use, you should be familiar with the sound signature and its strengths and shortcomings.
Mixing bass to be audible on a smartphone is important for a Tiktok or Instagram video, but maybe not so much for a vinyl track that targets club DJs.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ljazz and bullshark
I currently have a pair of Sony's MDR-7506 and AKG K240s. The Sony's have a way of presenting vocals which brings them forward and sweet sounding at the same time, which means I don't have to make a special mix for tracking vocals, singers love them. I understand why they're used in the broadcast industry the world over. Unfortunately, if I mix using those and then listen on other system, the vocals tend to be buried.

The k240s I own are the current one, not the high impedance one's of old of which I used to own and remember them sounding very good. While the new one retain the very good transient response of the old one's, which make them very good for tracking instruments with sharp attack, they don't have the same level of details and balance. If I mix using those the high tend to sound harsh when listening on other system. They are very good for setting compressors though as, somehow, a compressor who start to pump is instantly obvious when listening on those cans.

As to my room, it is a bass sinkhole somehow(how ironic for a bass player). I have a pair of Adam T7V, I turned on the bass boost in the back, yet I hear no bass. You can guess as to how my mix sound if I mix without checking on other device. I thought about getting a sub, but good ones are expensive, and I'm not even sure it would solve this particular problem.

The obvious is to get a good set of cans. But, as you may know, it is a bit more complicated than it sound. Everybody's ears are shaped differently, which will not only affect comfort, but also sound stage. Case in point, the Beyerdynamics which a lot of people love and swear by, while for others they sound awful. Which means you cannot rely on reviews only, you really have to try them on for yourself, and listen to material you already know very well.

And sure, the old advice of checking your mix in the car still apply.
I have 3-4 sets of phones plus monitors. Sony, akg, Beier Dynamic. and another that eludes me at the moment. I get the mix happening on the monitors and then check it on the various sets of cans. Once its sounding good on all of it, the mix is pretty solid
 
The Audio-Technica ATH-M50xBT2 Wireless Headphones seem to get a lot of love for the price. I used to have the wired version (ATH-M50) and liked them, fairly neutral. But I'm a newbie at the rat's nest of acronyms for wireless audio protocols. I'm especially looking for a set that can be worn for 3-5 hours without stress. It's been a few years since I had the ATH-M50s and can't recall how they compare to my Sony MDR-7506s.