Ok, for all of you arguing about this. Take something into consideration. EB doesn't care as much as many of you think they do about their product. Neither does Fender. Large corperations their size don't need good products, they just need to make money.
First, it's 'corporations'.
Second, and then I'll stop numbering things because it's annoying, it's apparent and obvious to anyone who's been to the EBMM shop in San Luis Obispo that you have no idea what you're talking about. None. Zero. Zip. Nada.
I don't often say that, because most of the discussions I have here are about opinions, but you state that EBMM cares less than we think they do? Wrong. Completely and totally FOS, my man. You can tell me you don't care for the Bongo or that you don't like the SUB or the Stingray isn't your cup of tea, and I think, "Okay, sure."
But now you want to tell me you know how little the Ball family and the hardworking engineers and others at EB care? They cared enough to save a company that was headed for oblivion, and they care enough every day to keep looking for ways to make the instruments better. You have no idea how much Sterling Ball (or his sons or the other people at Musicman) care about making good tools for musicians.
So - you're dead wrong, pal.
Or maybe you know more about the Ball family than I do? I'll give it a listen if you have some information.
Leo Fender did care when he designed his Fender, Music Man, and G&L products, and each time he sold each company, it was his hope to get the best designed instruments possible out there. His dream was sadly not fufilled. EB and Fender just wanted to put out basses that would make money.
Do you know why Leo Fender sold the company to CBS? Do you know what happened with Leo and MusicMan?
Thats why they bought the companies from Leo. Because they were instruments designed well enough to still be good if they were put together like crap (I'm talking more Fender here. EB, as I said, has good QC).
I can't speak to CBS' motivation, although I suspect it was to make money. Why not? But MusicMan was getting ready to disappear when the Ball family stepped in. If you're going to imagine things about these events and these people, you should at least do some work on your history.
I personally don't feel that EBMM products are worth 1,500-2,000 dollars. I don't feel that the S.U.B. basses are worth what they cost (they are as low quality as any SX bass could be. I dont care if they are made in the US. That makes no differnce to me. Being on out soil doesn't make a bass holy. It can still be a crap bass).
Now you see? Those are opinions! Badly formed and not reasoned very well, but opinions nonetheless.
I do feel that SX basses could be better put together, and have more attention to detail, what what is important is the price.
Is that what's important? That makes a lot of sense.
SnakeAnthony said:
Look. EBMM is a corperation. Regardless of its sized compared to Fender, it is still a mainstream corperation.
You mean with a chairman of the board and shareholders and stock and all that? Hmmm.
Basswood is such a crappy wood. I hate its sound and its dissapointing on these instruments.
Now you're on solid ground! Wait - hold on - maybe not. Basswood is a perfectly good tonewood, it's just not very pretty...so where does all your wood knowledge come from? School me if you can!
And no I did not know that about Leo. But that statement was a generalization of all of his products, from Fender to MM, to G&L.
There is so much to learn.
You better get started.
Jack