Yep.Oh, no it's not. The crux of the biscuit is the apostrophe.
Hate to tell you you're wrong, and hope you get over it.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Yep.Oh, no it's not. The crux of the biscuit is the apostrophe.
Hate to tell you you're wrong, and hope you get over it.
Is it me or do SX owners seem to continuously justify there 150 dollar basses by saying they play as well or better than basses costing 5 to 6 times more? I am not picking sides but if I can afford an MIA P (2008 or newer) over an SX than you can bet I am spending the extra bucks. I have played several SX basses and several new Fender MIA s and for me the choice is easy. If your SX plays as well as a more expensive bass then that s cool.
The long-term stability of an instrument is largely ignored, I think. I've had a few cheaper instruments that I thought were pretty great, but I noticed they needed adjustment a lot more in the neck. I think the quality of the neck wood and the quality of the trus rod should be taken into account before writing off a more expensive instrument just because you don't feel it sounds any better.
That >.<
I could easily pick up a mint or near mint 08 for about 800 bucks.
I haven't really looked at other makes, probably because I am the generic, lazy, typical American boozer sittin' in front of my computer rather than applying greater effort to my other occupation.I'm not surprised the American made Fender was so flawed. Overpaid, overweight Americans are so busy on the internet and their cell phones thinking only about themselves and their next beer, they do crappy work. Still, many will try to discredit sound reasoning.
There is one comment made somewhere back that had something to do with being able to tell the difference between basses while blindfolded. Well there is one bass that I will always be able to identify: mine!
I know every nick, every ding, every fret that has edges on the sides. I know exactly where to set the volume pots to get exactly the sound I want for each song I play. I know what adjustments to make to the outer pickup set screws to get the sound "hotter" on my g string. I know immediately when the intonation is drifting. I could go on and on, but I think I have made my point: we can spend a lifetime comparing and critiquing basses, but in the end the only review that matters is your own. I can get hundreds of recommendations form hundreds of bass monsters on which is the best bass for xyz genre. Unless they are going to play the instrument for me, their opinion can only reflect their relationship with their instrument, nothing more.
Is it me or do SX owners seem to continuously justify there 150 dollar basses by saying they play as well or better than basses costing 5 to 6 times more?
I am not picking sides but if I can afford an MIA P (2008 or newer) over an SX than you can bet I am spending the extra bucks. I have played several SX basses and several new Fender MIA s and for me the choice is easy. If your SX plays as well as a more expensive bass then that s cool.

Oh, no it's not. The crux of the biscuit is the apostrophe.
Hate to tell you you're wrong, and hope you get over it.
As it stands right now, my graphite reinforced MIA Fender neck needs to be adjusted more frequently than my non reinforced 4 1/2 year old SX.
I've heard opinions that the "graphite rods" in Fender's necks take up so much space in the neck that a large amount of wood has to be removed, which results in a far less stable neck than if it were just solid wood.
That empty space is being 'displaced' by much denser and stiffer carbon tubes. They're not stuffing the neck with marshmellows...
... According to laws of physics, hollow cylinder is stiffer than a solid rod...
There is one comment made somewhere back that had something to do with being able to tell the difference between basses while blindfolded. Well there is one bass that I will always be able to identify: mine!
... I could go on and on, but I think I have made my point: we can spend a lifetime comparing and critiquing basses, but in the end the only review that matters is your own. I can get hundreds of recommendations form hundreds of bass monsters on which is the best bass for xyz genre. Unless they are going to play the instrument for me, their opinion can only reflect their relationship with their instrument, nothing more.
i'm exactly the opposite...if I had $1400 for a new bass, needed a P bass, and the choices were Fender and SX...
SX everytime baby. Even if I have to throw another $100 at the SX its still the better choice (for me)
As it stands right now, my graphite reinforced MIA Fender neck needs to be adjusted more frequently than my non reinforced 4 1/2 year old SX.
I have yet to attend a GTG where someone had an SX (I've been to five in two years), so that might have something to do with it. I wish they had, 'cause I'd like to try one out in person.True that. But I will repeat what I said the last time I responded in a long one of these threads:
WHAT we NEED is a round of DOUBLE BLIND testing. Have a TB meet and greet, bring some J and P or PJ basses and let people play them blindfolded and RATE them for tone and playability. ALSO while the blindfolded person is playing them, have EVERYONE not behind the curtain with the blindfolded player (so they can't see what bass is being played) RATE the TONE.
But NO ONE took me up on my suggestion before, and I really don't expect them to now. Why is that, I wonder?
I think, more than anything, this speaks poorly of QC. If a company is going to sell a set of instruments for over a grand, there shouldn't be any "duds".