• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Double Bass tail piece saddles

I've been using Mike Pecanic's tailpiece cord for a while and am quite pleased with it. I've used the aircraft cable solution as well and it was fine, but I think the cord route allows more freedom of movement and made a sonic difference with my bass anyway.
 
Bob Branstetter said:
The great majority of luthiers and players prefer to use a flexible multi-strand steel cable instead of solid wire. I use 3/32" stainless steel aircraft cable exclusively in my shop.

So manay people queue up here to praise either Pecanic's or Velvet's cord (which you tie on with a sort of boy scout knot :eek: ) that it makes a change to see an esteemed luthier hasn't jumped on the bandwagon. Have you tried it Bob? You're a man who keeps up to date with the latest and must have a reason for staying put - yes?
 
Well - brother Dick, being something of an airplane builder, may be able to provide me with some of the aicraft cable. He's got a bodacious shop - enviable, actually - and is also providing some experimental soundposts, and asistance on my front wood. (a Maine feller). Ain't it nice to be retired? I get to do all the things I never had quite time enough to do - or at least some of 'em.
 
Mike Crumpton said:
So many people queue up here to praise either Pecanic's or Velvet's cord (which you tie on with a sort of boy scout knot :eek: ) that it makes a change to see an esteemed luthier hasn't jumped on the bandwagon. Have you tried it Bob? You're a man who keeps up to date with the latest and must have a reason for staying put - yes?
Yes, I have tried it multiple times. If there was any improvement to to actual sound in the same exact configuration as compared to using 3/32" aircraft cable, it was not apparent to me and IMO the price of the stuff totally outrageous. I think much of the perceived improvement is psychological or the result of other changes (such as changing the afterlength, etc) made at the same time may account for any apparent change. However, if someone thinks it works for them - I won't argue the point. If they are happy, that's all that counts.
 

Latest posts