I forgot to mention the neck stability. Most stable wooden necks I've ever owned
Enjoy the benefits of a premium membership!
Upgrade Account
-
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
I found the edges on the bound fingerboard to be sharp. I actually sanded mine down a little
The unbound necks feel fine
The unbound necks feel fine
And 19mm string spacing on a totally different neck. Also 3-position coil tap switches with V/V/T pots.
The regular 5-string model has been referred to incorrectly in this thread as the "5XL". It is R5L or Rumblefish 5L. There is a Rumblefish XL (RXL) which is a 4-string PJ.
Ah sorry, that's me, my bad. Been 10+ years, forgot the specifics. R5L it is.
Not to add to the confusion, but the original Rumblefish XL was a JJ. The earliest XL's still had the thinner body and the skunk-stripe neck. The PJ version came later.
Looks almost just like my 5ers. I guess I thought "XL" because it's 35" scale, thought it was a reference to that. Anway, I stand corrected and informed.Not to add to the confusion, but the original Rumblefish XL was a JJ. The earliest XL's still had the thinner body and the skunk-stripe neck. The PJ version came later.
Not to add to the confusion, but the original Rumblefish XL was a JJ. The earliest XL's still had the thinner body and the skunk-stripe neck. The PJ version came later.
You brought to my attention that I was completely mistaken about the 4-strings' names. The original 4-string was simply the Rumblefish. The XL added the voicing switch and was never made as a PJ. The PJ was called.....wait for it.....the PJ! The 5-strings were the 5L and the Brad Houser.
The first Eastpointe necks were some of the best ever. I remember being able to go to Joe's shop back when I lived/worked in Roseville, right down the road a few miles. My buddy had the first and only reverse headstock Rocco. Joe refused to make another because it was a huge PITA as they just didn't make lefty's. This was '97 /'98.
I've noticed that the latest versions of the Decision and Justice basses seem to have the "natural" wood headstock, as opposed to the first Decision and Justice basses they made, where the head stock was black. That's just a cosmetic thing... but does anyone know how these newest versions of the Decision and Justice compare to the ones they put out a few years back? I'm also curious about the Mercalli 4... How does that compare? (I know the Rumblefish was a whole other thing... I'm talking about the newer Reverend basses.)
The newer ones dont have bound necks - but - people have commented how the newer ones, without the binding, have smoother fret ends. Cosmetically, i probably like the look of no binding a little more - particularly on the maple.
It wasn't the binding that made them feel so smooth, it was the "rolling", the rounded edge where the neck actually gets slightly wider and then narrower again as you move down away from the fretboard - so when you're sliding up and down the neck, your hand is riding on smooth polished wood rather than the edges of the frets. The only other bass I've seen it on is a JAF custom 5.
Here's the best example of what I'm talking about that I can think of: it's like "tumblehome" on a boat hull, where the fretboard is the ships deck:
See how the sides get narrower near the top? That's the "tumblehome" or "rolled edge" - your hand never even gets near the edges of the frets, it's a really slick feel. But I can see how it takes more time and money to manufacture, too. Only other bass I've ever seen it on is a JAF custom.
