TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
If he was going to arrest her, he could have put her in hand cuffs. There was absolutely no reason to tase her. She wasn't physically resisting at all, and she was no threat to the officer.
It's either tasers, pepper spray, or a bullet. If you act like a jackass, your going to get one.
I didn't get any pleasure from seeing the old lady getting tasered. I saw nothing that I consider extremely horrific.
Old lady should have coorperated more. She was endangering herself and the policeman by reacting so frantic next to a busy highway.
IMO, she asked for hard handling.
But I don't agree on police using tasers.
Do most people feel that tasers are useful law enforcement tools or should they be replced with somethig else? Is the issue the situation in which it was used or the age of the tazed? At what age should an officer not use a taser? Would you feel the tazing was justified if she were younger?
I think mentioning the President is being unnecessarily political.
As for the woman getting tasered. I honestly feel there is a racial angle here. She is a 72 year old white woman, who is probably used to having cops defer to her. She thought getting roughed up was something cops did to Blacks and Mexicans, or really, really sassy white kids.
I think it would have be very hard to find a Black or Latino grandma who would have given a cop that much back talk because they would have known he would crack their heads if push came to shove. Needless to say any man, especially any man who is not white, would never have acted that way. At least not without expecting some rough treatment.
First rule of Officer Survival: Until they are under your direct, physical control, every individual is a potential threat.
Except for the fact that they were right by a busy freeway and the possibility of the conflict heading towards said freeway was increased because of the woman being dead set on getting back in her truck and taking off. Plus she would have had to been restrained by the cop who is much bigger than her, and he could have easily broken or bruised her. Which gives her leverage to sue.Off course, in this case with the old lady, I'd suggest that the cop would overpower her, handcuff her, and let her spend several hours in jail in the police station for not cooperating with law enforcement.
Bats eh? Broken bones, bruises, and cracked skulls? I really don't think that a quick jolt of voltage that stuns and put's you into a stiff state (what is that term?) is nearly as violent as a bat, baton, or stick to the body, head, or other areas. We also as a society here in america have moved to viewing bats and other solid hitting objects on cops as excessive violence.I favor the use of bats by police toward hostile persons.
That's just fair straight-on restraining and defending. It might cause serious injuries but I don't consider that torture.
Tasers are just over the line of torture.
America is a whole 'nother animal my friend. A lot of people here have a natural hate and distrust for policemen. (which is another story that would take a pretty nasty thread to explain) The chances of a person doing exactly what they are told when they are told to do it are slim and none, especially if said person is drunk, high, or belligerent otherwise. And if they have a gun, the situation is far more dangerous. Most policemen around here are trained to keep everyone as safe as possible. Unfortunately they have to move towards non-lethal instant stopping weapons to subdue and control these days.Why policemen here can enforce the law without using any of the three, I have no idea. That's too long a question for me to answer, but I guess it has something to do with respect and public perception of authority figures. And maybe also the fact that it is somehwhat hard to get a firearm here. Unless I am mistaken, policemen in the US tend to be very cautious because of the 'high' chance of the suspect carrying a firearm.
I don't think color or class had anything to do w/ this one, I live in Oklahoma, my daughter lives in Texas. I'm all over Oklahoma and north Texas. They pull you over here for ANYTHING. I've gotten 3 warnings in 3 years because they Reilly didn't have a reason to pull me over. My dad is 76, same thing.
One thing I do believe to be true is if this was a 6'4" 300 lb. Biker. Nobody would be talking about it.
It's about tasing an irrational old lady.
Maybe he did take her age into consideration. What if she had Osteoporosis and he manhandled her. He could have broke some bones.
Bats eh? Broken bones, bruises, and cracked skulls? I really don't think that a quick jolt of voltage that stuns and put's you into a stiff state (what is that term?) is nearly as violent as a bat baton, or stick to the body, head, or other areas.
And having her fall to the ground is a great way to stop her from breaking anything
The colour/class thing (as far as I see) is nothing to do with the policeman, or why she was pulled over, but the woman's attitude after being approached. Going with her "untouchable" attitude. Not to mention the fact she was saying how everything was a lie and she had been a regular mary poppins (until she found out it was on video).
OK, I don't agree, but I know where your comming from now.+1, her attitude once she got pulled over, not the fact that she was pulled over was what I felt was affected by her race.
Thanks for adding something to the thread. I was geting tired of the rational thoughts of people, too...hmmm...
cop tasing old lady? not cool.
old lady tasing cop? way cool.
I don't get any entertainment or humor from the video either. I just thought it was worth discussing.
And her lack of cooperation is (at the least) good cause for why he initially shoves her. The majority of highway patrolmen killed while on duty (at least according to my police officer brother) are hit by cars while out on a traffic stop. Here's a video of a near escape. This lady wanted to try and argue right by the edge of the road like an idiot.
As with the quoted post above this seems to be a lot of people's opinion. Remember, several other non-lethal methods have been removed from an officers repertoire. The nightstick choke is now off limits for them, and many states have removed pepper spray as being non-effective and putting the officer's life in danger if they unsuccessfully attempt it against a much more dangerous suspect.
I'm not sure how I feel about tasers, but the question is what you would put in their hands instead.
I remember riding in a fraternity brother's car while at Cal when he was pulled over. He's a Persian guy from orange county and is being really talking back to the CHP while his roommate (who is black and from Compton) and I (white but from Oak Park in Sacramento) are staring with our eyes wide. I'd say being wealthy is as much a part of this behavior as being white.
Also, it isn't just "sassy" white kids. Having never been someone that dressed outlandishly but having friends who did, I've seen this from both sides. White kids dressed up in "gangsta" attire or as punks or metalheads often get treated differently from the get go as well.
But in general, I agree with your point. Regardless of the actual rationale behind it, some people feel well within their rights to talk back, berate or try to push around cops in ways that most people wouldn't dream of. Did this lady deserve to be tased? I don't know. But she deserved some sort of punishment for her behavior.
Well, with that, every person who verbally expresses that they do not want to be arrested should be tased.
Thanks for adding something to the thread. I was geting tired of the rational thoughts of people, too...
Mike