TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Now I’m hungry,.....dammit.I'm in.....popcorn is popping
DAMMIT. It's obviously been too long since I last saw that movie, I should have used Google.
Foolish of me![]()
You can please some of the people some of the time but you can't please all of the people all of the time.
DAMMIT. It's obviously been too long since I last saw that movie, I should have used Google.
Foolish of me![]()
That's interesting to me in and of itself after just being taken to task for the thread title
I was intentionally withholding my personal impressions so as not to influence anyone prior to listening for themselves.
I'm more than happy to give my own impressions in advance of the sound clips if that's what the thread prefers, or I can PM folks directly![]()
My inclination, right or wrong, would be to post the clips (including the DI-ed "stems" -- though maybe a bit later) and maybe discuss for a bit before sharing your impressions. If I was feeling mischievous, I might even withhold the names of the cabs for a bit (calling them A, B, C, etc.), but that level of mischief might be more than TBers would readily tolerate. I guess I'd be upfront about what's what, but wait a bit before injecting my own impressions. I think waiting a bit gives this the best chance of being a good learning experience for you and for the people listening. If there's a second round, you can take whatever you learn from the first into that.
I don't know that there's a perfect methodology by which to accomplish what you're trying to do. The best you can do is be transparent (as you seem to have been). For the record, I am interested both in the clips and in your subjective impressions of playing through the different cabs.
Thanks and take care.
The biggest challenge is going to be loudeness. Louder travks sound deeper and brighter so you should note the SPL difference then adjust to a common level. But what frequency do you use to perform the leveling?
I'm not planning on pushing any of these cabs, as they're all loaners and max spl isn't particularly a concern for me.
There's not as much volume difference between the cabs with the Monique 700 at 9 o clock on the master as you might think, there is a much more significant difference in tone.
That being said, I was a planning on noting the volume differences in the testing but printing the stems at the same volume, as not to skew the listeners impressions for the reasons you mentioned.
Yeah max SPL is not what I meant. Its sensitivity.
Do you have personal experience with these cabs?
Judging the book by it's cover it seems like a more traditional/conventional cab design than what I'm looking for personally, but I'll say hi at NAMM and see if he's interested in sending a loaner my way![]()
My D-410XLT was killer.....and will always hold a special place in my heartTo be fair that’s true of all of the good modern 4x10s. Everything post Eden D-410XLT.
That would be a fun wrinkle on this test, throw in some red herrings. A GS410, 410XLT, etc and see how many people shopping for a studio monitor flat cab are like “damn number 7 sounds killer!!”
Had one of those too (98 lbs) :***: Also had a DNS 410 and it was even killererer (78 lbs). Much better from top to bottom and without the low-mid hump. But I won’t do 410’s anymore. (The only considered exception would be a BF Four10 due to its light weight, but I still wouldn’t. I’d just get another Two10 and Tall ‘em Up)My D-410XLT was killer.....and I will always hold a special place in my heart for that cab
To be fair that’s true of all of the good modern 4x10s. Everything post Eden D-410XLT.
That would be a fun wrinkle on this test, throw in some red herrings. A GS410, 410XLT, etc and see how many people shopping for a studio monitor flat cab are like “damn number 7 sounds killer!!”