Enjoy the benefits of a premium membership!
Upgrade Account
-
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
The "But" Thread
- Thread starter soulgeezer
- Start date
Not to be argumentative, but I find Bruce rather funny.
Not to be a critic here, but mark did say his "posts" not himself
Heh, not to bitch about you fighting my battles but I was gonna write somewhat the same and you beat me to it.
See Bruce? Proper use of smiley to indicate the use of humour
Not wanting to teach grandma to suck eggs - but I've been using smileys to denote humour for the last 10 years or more and am somewhat of an expert, don't you know...
Not to be argumentative, but I find Bruce rather funny.
Not to blow my own trumpet, but I'm sure you're in the majority, there!
Not wanting to teach grandma to suck eggs - but I've been using smileys to denote humour for the last 10 years or more and am somewhat of an expert, don't you know...
oh i know it alright.
oh i know it alright.
NOT to be picky... BUT you're not following the format of the thread!!
NOT to be picky... BUT you're not following the format of the thread!!
Not to be THAT guy but...Bruce, can you put your tongue back in your mouth, please?
I was pretty sure I knew what "prurient" meant but to my dismay, this is the definition I found: "marked by, arousing, or appealing to sexual desire"
I said not to be prurient - but there's no smoke without fire, as they say!
Not to be a Bruce, but your onerous coinage of that term may fester me a bit...
Not to get personal, but are you saying that you physically light yourself on fire before you have "relations"?I said not to be prurient - but there's no smoke without fire, as they say!
Mike
Not to put too fine a point on it, but I think you have confused onerous with erroneous!!!
Not to be a pessimistic ******, but no, no confusion here.
