• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Double Bass The differences in playing an upright versus an electric.

My twelve year old son has been studying double bass for seven years. About two years ago I bought him a fretless and he's been taking lessons with a jazz bassist. His double bass teacher suggested he bring in some of the music he's been working on so as to see what he's doing on the electric. I asked if I should bring the electric. She said no, that he could just play it all on the double bass. I asked if the two weren't different animals, remembering what I've read on these forums. She basically said that no they're the same animal. She went to Rice, where she studied with Paul Ellison has been and is in some very well respected orchestras and plays electric ( fretted ) as well. What am I missing here? On one hand I've read countless times that these two intruments are quite different and on the other I'm being told they're not. I'd appreciate someone weighing in on this subject.
 
I play both.. They are both tuned the same and are "Basses", but I still find them to be different.. I mean, I can practice on one and then do it on the other, but if I could choose I wouldn't do it that way.. Just my .02..
 
The teacher probably means that the music your son is working on, can be played on both instruments. Obviously, the approach is different in terms of fingerings and positions, but he can work out what he does on DB with the teacher, on BG when he gets home. She is also trying to save you from taking two instruments to the lesson. I guess.
 
I think that because so many things are so much easier on electric, fretted or fretless, than on DB, that kind of helps us not play maybe the same runs and helps give us a different outlook on the DB as well as opens up new ways of expressing ourselves on DB, slides, vibrato, less notes per measure etc. I agree that the teacher was saving you the trouble of bringing 2 instruments etc.
 
Difficult to answer this honestly without sounding like I'm calling the instructor's abilities into question, and I certainly don't want to give that impression. But they're pretty different instruments. The electric bass guitar is approached in a substantially different manner than the double bass. I'm not sure I could accurately judge anyone's bass guitar playing by observing them tackle the same material on the upright. Others may disagree....
 
There may be some educational value in learning the same material on both instruments, regardless of the technical differences. It may be that she wants to show your child how to approach the same repertoire on the double bass. I imagine they can complement each other on some level.

Not sure what Ellison's got to do with it. I've never heard him talk about electrics in any context.
 
I started on cello, taught myself fretless BG in high school, then took up DB in college. I think there are two contexts in which it is typically said that BG and DB are different beasts.

1. When someone who plays one instrument, wants to start learning the other.

2. The fact that each instrument has tones and playing styles that are difficult to reproduce on the other.

If your son already plays both instruments, then the first issue is moot. In terms of the second issue, he can try his BG material on the DB and see how it goes. No harm in trying. It can be interesting and fun to let the playing styles of the two instruments influence one another.
 
Probably she's teaching a semandl technique? I learned that way on the bg which is not as prevalent as the one finger per fret method. That's where I've always heard that they are different. I think that learning fretless was easier for me b/c I started with that technique...not as out of tune. I don't play the double, though.
 
I wouldn't look to far into it. She sounds like she must know what she is doing. She probobly just wondered how well he would be able to play the electric stuff on upright. If it turns out to be a big problem, there are a lot of great teachers in Cleveland who all know what there doing. I have been studying in Cleveland for a couple of years and it has been really benificial to my playing.
 
I'm not questioning her ability as a teacher. Her husband plays double bass in the Cleveland Orchestra. She's played in Apollos's Fire and plays in City Music. she's a fantastic teacher and my son is doing really well. I, as a non-musician, am trying to be enlightened as to why, other than the obvious differences, these two animals are considered to be so different by so many contributors to this forum.
 
My teacher really downplayed the differences between the instruments when I transitioned from fretless. Aren't they really more alike than different? Especially outside the "chops" territory.

She is probably trying to capitalize on progress that your son is making on the electric that aren't being actively pursued during her lessons. If he's going after some interesting rhythms on the electric, why not, on the DB, strike while the iron is hot?
 
Barongket said:
I'm not questioning her ability as a teacher. Her husband plays double bass in the Cleveland Orchestra. She's played in Apollos's Fire and plays in City Music. she's a fantastic teacher and my son is doing really well. I, as a non-musician, am trying to be enlightened as to why, other than the obvious differences, these two animals are considered to be so different by so many contributors to this forum.

I think I know who youre talking about actually. I don know her name but I have met her husband (whom I also don't know the name of) but I do know a couple of her students who are thrilled with her teaching. I play with them in the Cleveland orchestra youth orhestra and they generally do pretty well in the section. A student of hers was principle last year and there is another one of her students who is a good section player. I wouldn't even question it unless she does some drastic change like making him stop playing electric or only play electric music on upright or something. It could be a nice exersize to "sight read" previouseoy learned music on a different instrument and I would guess that is what she is going for.
Like I said before, the teachers in Cleveland are really fantastic. The reason I chose my teacher was because I favored his technique approach over the other teachers I had lessons with.
 
Oh and to answer your question I think the reason double bassists act that way is to discourage electric bassists from attempting to start playing the bass without any prior knowledge of theinstrument. Many times Electric bassists say they are new and on a budget and ask where to start and thatis the most eficcient response. Buy a playable bass that is stable and get lessons. They are very different instruments but there is nothing wrong with theteachers idea. Hope thatclears it up a bit.
 
A 5 year old on DB? Wow! At twelve he must be interested in pop/Rock/??? music and the ebg will be his instrument of choice. I think that you should follow the teacher's advice. She may want to take him the "classical" route, if you will, through jazz and get him to experience it on the db via jazz standards.

You're a good dad to be following up on him. Congrats.

Whatever you read here is a compilation of opinions with a few facts every now and again, however, the consensus seems to be that going from db to ebg is easier. I play both and have to practice on both to keep my chops up. Your son will figure it out.