• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

The dreaded Rickenbacker floppy E string!

I think you have to take Roger Glover's post with a big pinch of salt. Back in the '70s he was running his 4001 through Marshall Superbass heads into shallow, un-ported cabs. He was competing with a bassy guitar tone and a bassy organ tone through a backline of flabby non-master-volume tube amps into woefully inefficient flabby cabinets, at deafening volume. His rig, for all of its bluster, probably didn't reproduce the fundamental of the E string very well. I used to collect Mk2 Purple bootlegs, and some of them are just a wall of mud with some yelling over the top. Quite cool in a gonzo-esque way, but definitely not the recipe for good stage sound.

Listen to Roger's Vigier tone. That is the tone that Roger was trying to get, and failing. He was wanting to remove all the distortion from his tone. Like Geezer Butler, Roger is famous for a tone he wasn't actually happy with early on. I think Roger's Vigier tone sounds like an entry-level Ibanez Soundgear plugged into an entry-level Behringer DI box, not that it matters... that is clearly where his ears were hunting at in the '70s.

I think it makes modern Purple sound like a bloodless function band, but again that is just me!

There is absolutely no reason a Rickenbacker should have a weak E string if properly set up with the necessary care and attention. There is a pickup right down at the end of the neck that captures all the low end you would ever need. I think strings might be a critical factor here. Roger was probably a Rotosound man in the '70s, which wouldn't be considered the best string for the job today. Rotos were probably made with the same care and attention as British cars in the '70s (shots fired!) so were probably inconsistently wound and packaged up with minimal QC in place.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jamro217
Niggled you, didn't it? Job done!

Pointless? How so? It's a FACT and therefore open to discussion. Take your toys away elsewhere if you're gonna be like that, fella.

If "niggled" is defined as "irritated by idiocy", then yes, job well done.

This thread is like pulling the hair of the girl you have a crush on. You'll grow out of that soon hopefully and move on to techniques that employ finesse.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Anachronism
I owned a Ric a couple years ago. I think there are legitimate criticisms of them, which will very likely keep me from ever buying another (barring changes). But I never had a problem with the E string.
 
I believe that Roger used flats on the Ric for Machine Head --sure sounds like it compared to the overwhelming clank produced by Rotos. Always thought it pointless to buy a Ric and try to make it sound like a Fender.
The thing is a Rick can still do the clank with flats if that's what you want. Flats, low action and a pick you get a nice bottom with lots of clanky goodness! Switch to finger style and roll back some of the tone or tones control and do a decent Pbass imitation. In the 60's and up through I believe at least the mid 70's Rics came with flatwounds.
 

Latest posts