• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

The Eagle Has Landed!!! Sadowsky All-Tube Head!!!

tommixx said:
(...)

I have already taken the plastic off, it is mine! (...)

hehe,

as soon as i got my hands on my PJ-5, the first thing i did was rip the plastic off the guard and the backplate, as if to say, ITS NOT GOING BACK.

and nice pics, Tim,

love that wall of sheer tube. but what's that wee little WW head teetering at the top? :eyebrow: :smug:

and yes, Roger, the SA200 will be mine. didnt help that i just splurged on another Sadowsky bass, but it will be mine. oh yes... :D
 
OK...."even uglier" checking in here. Wow..check out my eyes. It looks like I defintitely sampled a few of Tom's fine Scotch's and beers (which I did!). First of all, Tim drinks crap. We had some damn fine scotch, and none of it tasted like jet fuel. ;)

I just have to comment on the SA200. For Larry and the rest of you non believers out there, YOU ARE WRONG. This is the single best sounding bass amp head, tube, solid state, or other wise, I have ever had the pleasure of hearing. I played several different basses through it. Tom's Sadowsky Anniversary Modern 24 (Which has now ascended to my most coveted bass on earth. I'll save that post for the basses forum, but it was without a doubt, the finest instrument my hands have ever touched. That includes all of Tom's even higher dollar basses. That Sadowsky is THE ONE for me...and .3 milliseconds after I hit the lottery, I'll be on the phone to Roger getting a Mahogany/Ebony modern 24 and an SA200).

I'm not real good at describing sounds, but the SA200 had it all. It had a definite "tube" tone, but with unreal clarity at the same time. Each note just jumped out of the speaker cab, strong and clear. The tone was absolutely sublime. Warm and crystal at the same time. You may say it was just Tom's Sadowsky bass my drunk butt is pictured playing, but the result was the same no matter what I used. I played Tom's Tbird, my Tbird, my Lakland Darryl Jones, and Tom's Gretsch Hollowbody all through the SA200, and they all were different shades of magnificent tone.

Now this amp is not SVT loud, however, I can't see it getting drowned out on stage unless you play with an absolutely insane amount of volume. That's what front of the house support is for.

I'm a "civil servant" with 3 kids, a wife, an ex, child support, a mortgage, etc. I can't afford one of these. However, If I could, I'd be on the horn to Roger yesterday to get in line for one of these incredible amps.
 
SMASH said:
God bless good Scotch !!!
.....+1
SMASH said:
Roger, can you give some background to how this amp came to be - how it came to reflect what you wanted to hear? The bio on your site doesn't mention if you play bass - so how does the r&d process go on something like this, or even the development of your other products, if you don't mind saying?

Thanks.

+1000

Happy Holidays

Mo'
 
Smash...I played the amp set absolutely flat. I didn't find the tone to be scooped at all. The mids were there. Of course, the true test is how it sits in a band mix, and I haven't performed that particular test, but Tom has, and he still loves it.
 
SMASH said:
I've been looking around and it seems to me that the price isn't outrageous for this amp. Sure, there's arguably a cachet factor in the name that jacks the price but that also jacks the resale so that's a wash IMO.
I agree.
Only 42 lbs? That's unusually light for an all-tube of that wattage isn't it?
I think so. The hybrid Aguilar DB750 is quoted at 42lbs (although having handled one it felt heavier)
 
Tim Cole said:
Just got back from Tom's place (THANKS Tom!), and I have to agree with the positive thoughts in this thread. Tom pulled out some serious artilery including the Sad amp, and it won hands down on tone IMO. The clarity and definition are incredible out of this head, and the only other amp even in it's league was the Trace V-8.

My pleasure, Tim! I had a really good time. And it's nice to know that I'm not totally out of my gourd! :p
 
anyonefortennis said:
For those in the shootout:

Did the SA200 have enough juice for the HT322?

Everyone keeps saying the 322 is VERY power hungry and not sure if 200 tube watts would be loud enough

That is actually my IP322 sitting there (see this thread).

So far, I am done most of my testing with the SA200 through my NV215. The NV series seem to fare pretty well with amps of power ratings ranging from the "merely adequate" to the "ridiculously overpowered." The SA200/NV215 rig is very gig worthy, though in a loud rock band setting, I did have to run my gain pretty high (right, Tim? :p) - but bear in mind, I was barely in the PA, and could have definitely backed off if I had to (though I didn't want to be in the PA; the SA200/NV215 sounded so good, I wanted to hear it all the more!).

I am hoping to be able to try some 6550A's or KT-88's in the SA200 fairly soon. All I need is time... :eyebrow:

Tom.
 
SMASH said:
So, how were the mids in the "cutting range" there's no knob for? I like the idea of a tube amp that retains clarity - but any concern of it being scooped?

IMHO, no, not at all. This amp offers some of the best mids that I've heard. They are very full and fat, but with clarity. People often ascribe different tonal characteristics to "cut", but for me, I would never worry about the mids being scooped on this amp. The "clean/fat" switch does provide a good bit of control over the mids, to be honest.

SMASH said:
Only 42 lbs? That's unusually light for an all-tube of that wattage isn't it?

IME, yes.
 
Now, more than a month since the last post, but I'm still interested in two points which were discussed, but not answered:

1) Can Roger's amp be hopped up with the substitution of the 6550's?

2) How does the SA 200 compare to the Mesa 400?