• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Double Bass The essentials.

Hey everyone,

Was wondering if we could crowd-develop a basic list of 'the essentials' needed to have a solid, workingman's command over the instrument (orchestral, not jazz), for the vast majority of rep from the so-called common practice period ca. 1600-1930 or so. In other words, what does everyone here feel the 10-15 technical skills that are absolutely non-negotiable to being a valuable, dependable freelance section bassist. (I'm mainly talking about orchestral work, not necessarily solo or chamber work.)

Here's a start:

1. Completely solid, confident intonation up to the A just above the G harmonic. Like, "bet your car on it" solid intonation. If you're shifting from an F# on the E string to an F# on the G string, no problem. Those cascading F-A shifts in Brahms 2, no problem. And the ability to micro-adjust to match your section's pitch.

2. Having a great command of full dynamic range with good tone from PP to FF.

3. Being able to play sixteenth-note passages, that may or may not require tricky string crossings or leaps, *cleanly*, up to 140bpm.

4. Great rhythm, and the ability/flexibility to adjust to your principal, conductor, soloist if they play ahead or behind the beat accordingly.

5. Great spiccato. Clean at any speed, any dynamic.

6. Great "light" Mozart/Hadyn-style spiccato. Again, any speed, any dynamic.

7. Strong, confident sight reading abilities.

8. Flexibility, adaptability as an ensemble member. You're a good guy, decent sense of humor, able to take direction, able to give thoughtful, considered, helpful input as warranted. A specific example: The technical ability to switch bowing/phrasing on the spot if your principal/conductor requests it. Another: you have been playing it off the string, but the principal asks you to play it on the string. You understand/appreciate why they're asking for it, and can adjust accordingly.

9. For audition purposes, a solid command of the excerpt rep, basic concerti (koussevitsky, dittersdorf, etc.), and some bach solo work.

10. Musicality. Ability to phrase. I realize this is less concrete than the above, and I'm specifically looking to develop a checklist of concrete things here, but being a musical individual is something I feel we can't leave off the list. Especially knowing the difference between how to phrase baroque v. classical v. romantic.

11. Basic knowledge of the instrument, i.e., knowing what might be causing that buzz, knowing what a good set up feels like, knowing the qualities of different kinds of strings, the ability to objectively discuss why you like one bow or one bass over another... etc. (I don't think you need to be a luthier, but I do think you need to have an interest/awareness about how your instrument works if it's your livelihood.)

12-15+. ?

Hoping this opens a good dialogue about the most essential skills requires to be a successful and solid section player. Would especially love to hear from working section players here and abroad on this.
 
Great idea! Having all of this info in one place will be super helpful. I'd be happy to contribute to the wiki at some point. I've listened to a lot of recordings of these solos and excerpts, so I'd be happy to post some of my favorites.
 
My 2 cent.

More of an amateur level:
Being able to play airbass when you get desynched with the rest of the section/orchestra

Common more than you think, even at professional level:
Being able to improvise approximate that redicilously hard part when the conductor suddenly adds the bass section and starts the downbeat during reharsal.

And ubiqutous:

14: Being good att following (or rather paying attention to) the Conductor, Concert master, Principal Bass and the rest of the orchestra.

15: Being reliable. Learning the pieces, be on the reharsals on time.
 
Wiki is a super cool idea. Though I'm less talking about HOW to do these things in the specific sense (which is I think covered elsewhere, though disparately) and more to simply come up with a basic checklist of essentials.


Not discouraging the wiki though, because that will be a completely amazing resource. Thanks for setting that up.
 
How about ability to match note lengths and decay to the section? A particular bugaboo of mine is when a sub comes in and you always hear him at the end of the notes. He's sometimes simply playing the notes too long, or he's not tapering them off in a musical way. It really kills me.
 
How about ability to match note lengths and decay to the section? A particular bugaboo of mine is when a sub comes in and you always hear him at the end of the notes. He's sometimes simply playing the notes too long, or he's not tapering them off in a musical way. It really kills me.

That's kind of what i had in mind when I wrote "paying attention to the rest of the orchestra", maybe we could find a better way to formulate it? I mean, it's not only decay, but intonation, attack, vibrato speed/thickness, etc.
 
All of the above are excellent points, including the WIKI. Very good. I would add one thing, for the aspiring orchestral bass player...once you get through the Simandl 30 Etudes, you will be ready for just about anything you will ever see in a bass part, up to Shostakovich and those after him.
 
/\ I'm not sure the OP was looking for this but yes, mastering a book like Simandl 30, or Bille or Storch-Hrabe is certainly a stepping stone to instrumental competency for us. IMHO, too many students gloss over Simandl 30. To play it *well* is a monumental challenge, and the skill set the book teaches us is invaluable.
 
While I agree with almost all the suggestions above, particularly the original post, I would tend to summarise them down to six basic priorities. Everything else, excluding the orchestral etiquette and fun to be around, fall somehow under these.

As I see them the five priorities are to play (1) in tune, (2) in time, (3) all the notes, (4) musically, and (5) in style. The 6th. is to do all these things REALLY well. I have sat on many auditions across a wide spread of instruments as union rep. and the people who don't make it past the first couple of rounds usually haven't met all the first 5, let alone the 6th, criteria above.

A good technique alone will satisfy my first 3 priorities. To me what lifts a player from being mediocre, or even good,
to great is their musical and stylistic qualities. Mentally and technically flexible and alert, sensitive and quick to to pick up on subtleties of phrasing and style.

Having studied the "basic" repertoire (not just excerpts but including a lot of listening to recordings with score in hand and attending concerts) is a good preparation that should be included above.

DP