TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Great game, for the Lakers to win they're role players are going to have to step up. But I'll stand by my assertion that Boston is a better team.
You said Barry wasn't fouled by Fisher. I'm smelling some serious bias.Wow, the officials really turned it on for the Celtics. Lakers can't buy a foul if they drive the lane.
It's 8 on 5 out there.
THE BIGO I'd say you're biased by the Eastern Conference (not to mention the team that knocked yours out of the playoffs) but I'm not going get caught calling a kettle black. I think the Lakers are a much better team. Again, Kobe is a better finisher than anyone else in the league, and certainly better than whoever the C's go to in crunch-time.
You said Barry wasn't fouled by Fisher. I'm smelling some serious bias.![]()

He certainly wasn't fouled in the act of shooting. That was the point I was trying to make. If he had even pretended to lob the ball in the direction of the basket he would have shot three. He dribbled after the foul/non-call. I agree with the NBA, he should have shot two. Weren't the Spurs down by three at the point?
I'm a Heat fan, I don't really care who wins this.
The majority of the "Baustan" fans in this thread are as bandwagon as they come. Non of them were here last year when the Celtics won 20 games.
As far as the Lakers, LA as a city is as bandwagon as they come.
ADAM BARKLEY He certainly wasn't fouled in the act of shooting. That was the point I was trying to make. If he had even pretended to lob the ball in the direction of the basket he would have shot three. He dribbled after the foul/non-call. I agree with the NBA, he should have shot two. Weren't the Spurs down by three at the point?
Of course they weren't here last year. This is a Playoffs thread.The majority of the "Baustan" fans in this thread are as bandwagon as they come. Non of them were here last year when the Celtics won 20 games.
The Celtics turned the D up in the second half, and that was the difference. For the Celts to with the series, they have to exploit their biggest advantage over the Lakers: the toughness and physicality of the front line. Garnett, Perkins, and Pierce are all strong, tough players who can defend and rebound. Gasol, Odom, and Radmanovic are all tall players with ball skills who can shoot, but who usually rely on others to set the table for them offensively. Garnett and especially Pierce can create their own shots, so while the Lakers have a 3 to 2 (or +1, if you prefer) advantage in offensive skills down low, the Celtics have a 3 to 0 (or +3) advantage in muscle/toughness. If they can use that to control the boards and contest most of the inside stuff, they'll be in good shape.
Also, what's up with Lamar Odom? Sometimes he looks incredible, and other times he looks as soft as Glen Davis' midsection. If he can't be more consistent, he'll be hurting his team.
Of course they weren't here last year. This is a Playoffs thread.
That's the unfortunate story of Odom's career. Remarkably talented guy, but he takes games off.Also, what's up with Lamar Odom? Sometimes he looks incredible, and other times he looks as soft as Glen Davis' midsection. If he can't be more consistent, he'll be hurting his team.
+1 all the way on this one.They were down two. And they didn't have any fouls to give. so he would gotten to the line at least with a chance to tie. And most refs would have given Barry the Continuation on that play. If you get fouled while pump faking, it's usually considered a shooting foul. That was actually a really dumb play by Fischer, the first thing a coach tells you in JV is DON'T FOUL a jump shooter in that situation. One thing is for sure, Barry didn't initiate the contact. I still think LA would have won the series, and I think the non-call is a symptom of the pathetic state of officiating more then a conspiracy in that case.
Of course they weren't here last year. This is a Playoffs thread.
(the Lakers) may be the worst rebounding team to get to the finals in a while. They don't have a genuinely tough player in the paint who knows how to work for rebounds or position.
Garnett, Perkins, and Pierce are all strong, tough players who can defend and rebound. Gasol, Odom, and Radmanovic are all tall players with ball skills who can shoot, but who usually rely on others to set the table for them offensively.
I'm a Miami/Ft. Lauderdale native myself. I haven't lived there much since the Heat came around, but I know how bandwagon-y South Florida sports fans generally are. Regardless of how Celtics fans might be on here, Boston fans are much more dedicated and consistent in general than LA and Miami fans, IMO.He certainly wasn't fouled in the act of shooting. That was the point I was trying to make. If he had even pretended to lob the ball in the direction of the basket he would have shot three. He dribbled after the foul/non-call. I agree with the NBA, he should have shot two. Weren't the Spurs down by three at the point?
I'm a Heat fan, I don't really care who wins this.
The majority of the "Baustan" fans in this thread are as bandwagon as they come. None of them were here last year when the Celtics won 20 games.
As far as the Lakers, LA as a city is as bandwagon as they come.