+1... it really would look pretty cool... probably not as durable, tho.I just think it would look really sexy to have a wooden 'string guide', as you put it, and wooden knobs.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
+1... it really would look pretty cool... probably not as durable, tho.I just think it would look really sexy to have a wooden 'string guide', as you put it, and wooden knobs.
+1... it really would look pretty cool... probably not as durable, tho.![]()
Well, FWIW, the looks don't even bug me. I'm so used to seeing something black or white down there because of all the most typical basses that do have a graphtech or bone/synthetic nut there I never even thought about it. I've seen a few basses with wood nuts, but mostly fretless basses, and even then not many. Anyway, again, FWIW, and if you end up deciding to try the idea out, make sure and post info/pics.Very true. I may have to reconsider...
I guess durability is more important than looks.
Very true. I may have to reconsider...
I guess durability is more important than looks.
A Diamondwood nut (like Roscoe uses) would look slick and provide durability.


I DEFINITELY want pics!!!The man himself said that he didn't see any potential issues, but that if I ended up not liking it I could always just glue the old string spacer back on.
I'm going to e-mail Johnny Mørch now...
![]()
The mods may have a big problem with this post... PM'd ya...I ordered mine in...
No prob... I just don't want to see you get hammered on policy when I know you didn't mean it the wrong way.Thanks Vic, I can always count on you for keeping me in line.
I DEFINITELY want pics!!!![]()

Thanks JP.
...Remember, that's not a nut. It's only a string guide. I doesn't bear ANY load at all... it's sole purpose in life is to just space the strings. The zero fret does all the "work"...
Sounds to me like the string guide just wasn't cut deep enough at the factory, and in that case the B string was resting on it, and not the zero fret as it should have been, which you resolved.Hey all!
I'm curious about this, doesn't the nut still impact string buzz and some tension because of the angle it gives the strings before they reach the tuning pegs?
I'm asking because I bought a passive MTD Kingston Artist 5 string with a zero fret last year (as a backup bass primarily used in outdoor gigs, really smokey bars, etc.), and when I received it from HugeGiganticMusicCorporationWithCrappyCustomerService.com (I'll let you all guess on which mega-corp shipped it) the B string had horrible fret buzz, even after neck/string/intonation adjustments.
I ended up sanding down the nut using... the B string itself (sand back & forth, re-string, tune, adjust, repeat) until it stopped buzzing (not kidding).
...the angle is governed by the headstock kickback, not the string guide. The string guide is ONLY there to space the strings apart properly on the zero fret. The zero fret takes ALL the force of the string at that end and the break angle to the tuning pegs is borne completely by the zero fret as well. If anything else is interfering, like an improperly cut string guide, it's just a minor problem to resolve... not part of the design.
Again, it is not a nut. MTD basses with zero frets do not have a nut. Period. End of line. End of story. Read my lips... no ifs ands or nuts.![]()