It came with a case, so I'm not quite sure what happened, I hope I can restore it, because even in this state, this bass sounds amazing. Pretty heavy, though, as expected![]()
ATKs are the new T-40s
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
It came with a case, so I'm not quite sure what happened, I hope I can restore it, because even in this state, this bass sounds amazing. Pretty heavy, though, as expected![]()
Love child of a Tele bass and some G&L?
Next, we have to mate it to an EBMM and see what happens...![]()
ATKs are the new T-40s
and probably lighter too...
I've never owned a T-40, but I had an early, if not first-gen ATK300. The thing weighed a metric butt-ton, but OMG the tone was amazeballs for the price at the time.
This is why I have my Oak/Walnut 5er (see profile pic) that I made with TWO of those awesome tri-blade pups.

I have also made 2 basses using the '80s T-40 pu's. Just sold one that had 2 with a myriad of coil-switching options. Great sounding pu's!![]()
I'd *love* to try out a T-40!
The "Peacemaker" (named because it brings Stingray and ATK parts together in one bass) has series/parallel and outer single coil options on each pup. If I played metal, I think this baby would bring the thunder...
I need to upgrade the preamp though... Literally the cheapest 3-band, 5 knob preamp on Ebay at the time...
I'm on a search for a set of those pups to put in a short scale explorer bass in my pipeline.I have also made 2 basses using the '80s T-40 pu's. Just sold one that had 2 with a myriad of coil-switching options. Great sounding pu's!![]()
I'm on a search for a set of those pups to put in a short scale explorer bass in my pipeline.
I like rail / bar pickups for this and other reasons.Because they don't have individual pu poles, they are quite versatile for a variety of scales & neck/bridge spacings.
I like rail / bar pickups for this and other reasons.
Say you have a 4 string bass, and you convert it to a 5. Avoids poles not ending up in a good place to pickup the strings - specifically the A string on P pickups, where the A lays right over the split in the shells. (the A will be nearly silent)What are the other reasons? I like the Peavey's because the coils can be split, but that doesn't have anything to do with the rails.
I feel that rails also tend to sound a bit more focused (in my opinion) if a bit compressed (in a good way)
I cant find the article, but the single pole creates a more even magnetic field in the sensing area (less "lumpy" for lack of a better descriptor )

I put a pair of the original Bill Lawrence L500's in an old Carvin to replace wasted M22's (literally beaten to death by previous owner ) The Carvin were effectively bars just a solid line of hex screws (stupid design)Ok, that's something to consider. I installed a Seymour Duncan "Hawkbucker" in my '64 T-bird II back in the late '80s and it has a bar for each coil. Never questioned it - it delivered from day 1.
View attachment 4068936
Because they don't have individual pu poles, they are quite versatile for a variety of scales & neck/bridge spacings.