TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
edit:HOLY CARP!!!
I just plugged her into my PC and ran through Freewill. She's HOT HOT HOT!
I had to adjust the levels BIG TIME, pull the vintage tone selector out, and I should drop the bridge pup.
No weak E string here!
Sounds fantastic, and that piano tone when played softly, WOW!
Jaymi, is that Burg?? Almost looks like a shoeless RIHS in the bridge position. A SD in the neck? Nice price!
Here's my new No.1, made in week 03 of 2010:
![]()
edit:HOLY CARP!!!
I just plugged her into my PC and ran through Freewill. She's HOT HOT HOT!
I had to adjust the levels BIG TIME, pull the vintage tone selector out, and I should drop the bridge pup.
No weak E string here!
Sounds fantastic, and that piano tone when played softly, WOW!
Oh yeah!
The old 4001 will be semi-retired from now on.
Well, she needs a fret job, and while Bruce (the best local guy) assures me there is still enough there for a proper job, it's getting dangerously close to needing a refret after years of (other people's) abuse and neglect.
I've ressurrected her as far as I can, and she certainly sounds great. Every time we get that stage volume going, it's love all over again, but that new 4003 is really going to be 'my' bass from the very start.
No issues or compromises at all.
I came to the realization last night that I believe RIC is using the same CNC body cuts for the 4003 and 4004 now.
I could be wrong, but the similarity is remarkable.
The slimmer body, position of the neck/body joint, and there's more of a wave crest on the body bout than a 4001/4000/4080/early 4003 (which is all I have to compare to).
The body horns are certainly a lot slimmer than all of my basses.
Yeah, I can understand that.
I prefer the slim vintage look, but enjoy the modern features.
I checked out your myspace and I love your tone, BTW.
Yep, the body was slimmed down in 1997. That is the last time I bought a newer one...I can't get around that....it is more like they were trying to recreate the body of the early ones but for me it just doesn't look right...
Thanks for your encouragement!!
I use a variety of different Rics to make tone but there are a couple that really sing compared to some others....I have been able to dig into certain years because of what I get out of them and then there are other years that I will not touch because of how many of that year that I have had. I have a few favorite years...those are the ones I try to hold on to...
Did the wider body style start with the 4003's or were any 4001's made like that?
+1 for your Tone !!! You really dig it !!! Cool !!!