The low point of all Rush lyrics:
"Net boy, net girl - put your message in a modem and throw it into the cyber sea."
Maybe, but it's still my favorite song on Test For Echo.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
The low point of all Rush lyrics:
"Net boy, net girl - put your message in a modem and throw it into the cyber sea."
I'm 42 now. I got into Rush right about P/G, and have loved them since.
Like most of us, I was happy when Presto came out. I thought the edgier sound was awesome.
I don't like Clockwork Angels, though. I've tried. Every so often I put it back in the player, just in case there was something else on my mind the last time I listened.
I don't like it. In my opinion, they have again moved too far away from their own DNA. The songs on that album and the production approach in particular is too sludgy.
In a certain way, it's like Hold Your Fire, but at the other side of the pendulum swing. Both are still Rush, but each has too much of a certain ingredient at the expense of other ingredients that make up the total Rush sound. To my ears.
I was OK with Snakes & Arrows, and now that I've heard the remixed Vapor Trails I think it's one of the better Rush albums overall. So I'm generally OK with the current musical direction but I think Clockwork took it a step too far.
I miss a little synthesizer in my Rush, and I'd like to hear a little more space in the music than what they are doing now.
Is that wrong?
At the end of the day, there's no such thing as "selling out" to an entity the size of "Rush", and if there was, they did it a looong time ago. I wish people would drop the idealistic vision of what they think a band should be about and smell the roses for once.
I think Wasting Light sounds way better than Clockwork Angels, but it might be a case of a similar production approach that was on the right side of the line for the one, and crossed over to the wrong side of the line on the other. One difference between the two is that Wasting Light sounds like it has half the tracks that CA has - way fewer overdubs and multiple guitar layers. Plus, I think the Foos' bass player uses a far less hairy tone - I think Geddy's current tone is overdriven to the point of obscuring the bottom end right now.I agree about Clockwork Angels being a bit of a mess. It's just too loud and too dense. I was listening to the Foo Fighters last album and you can definitely tell that Nick R. did the production.
Who said Rush had sold out? I don't feel that way at all; in fact it's clear that they are making the music they want to make now, and they know they will sell millions of copies (downloads) of whatever they release to their intensely loyal fan base.At the end of the day, there's no such thing as "selling out" to an entity the size of "Rush", and if there was, they did it a looong time ago. I wish people would drop the idealistic vision of what they think a band should be about and smell the roses for once.
I think Wasting Light sounds way better than Clockwork Angels, but it might be a case of a similar production approach that was on the right side of the line for the one, and crossed over to the wrong side of the line on the other. One difference between the two is that Wasting Light sounds like it has half the tracks that CA has - way fewer overdubs and multiple guitar layers. Plus, I think the Foos' bass player uses a far less hairy tone - I think Geddy's current tone is overdriven to the point of obscuring the bottom end right now.
Who said Rush had sold out? I don't feel that way at all; in fact it's clear that they are making the music they want to make now, and they know they will sell millions of copies (downloads) of whatever they release to their intensely loyal fan base.
To me, it's not a question of selling out - it's just that I don't personally like how far they went in a certain direction on the latest album, and there are ingredients they used to use in their music - most notably the analog synthesizers - that they aren't using anymore and that my ears miss.
I mean, how cool is it in "The Trees" when they come off of that rocking first stanza, break down the song, and Geddy plays that cool synth melody? Seeing him do that live for the first time (might have been the Hold Your Fire Tour) made the hair stand up on my neck.
Also, I think the first 32 bars of "Big Money" is some of the best Rush ever.
But their current stuff can sound good, too. They did a good production job on Snakes & Arrows. To my ears, the production on that one sounds more balanced, like Wasting Light, and less of a mess. I thought they were on the right track when I first heard that one.
The production on Counterparts is essentially perfect.
I agree, and that is not the sound they've ended up with. Clockwork Angels sounds nothing at all like an organic power trio, rather like an overbaked studio exercise with a million tracks, impossible to recreate live without extensive sampling use.From what I've read and heard of the music, I think their aim was to bring back the more organic power trio format.
That's the irony, though - analog synthesizers are the shizzle right now with the kids.it wouldn't surprise me that they tamed the use of synth down on the newer material to not risk sounding dated to newer audiences.
Nice! I'm happy that my 10-year old daughter knows who Champ Bailey is and why he is important. Appreciating Rush is a step beyond where I've been able to get with her.It's tough for me to fault them too much; we all have opinions and favorite eras in their catalog -- but it is THEIR catalog.
I took my 10-year old daughter to see their Clockwork Angels tour last summer; it was her first concert and she had a blast.
Her favorite song is YYZ -- she's a drummer.
But she also loved all of the animations that went with each song.
Months later, when we were on a road trip, she asked me to play Clockwork Angels and could recall the animations that had accompanied each song.
I'm a little more old-school; I got a bit misty-eyed standing there with her and hearing them blast through Tom Sawyer.
But they are a great band, and they got there by following THEIR muse, not ours.
(As far as the Foo Fighters linkage goes, my daughter and I were wearing matching Them Crooked Vultures t-shirts...)
Huh. My favorite Rush album is Signals, the first one I heard and learned all the way through was Hemispheres, and I'm apparently the only old-school Rush fan who digs Clockwork Angels.
.
Bring Kevin (The Caveman) Shirley back as engineer.
"Alex, here's your Les Paul and there's your Marshall stack. Leave the rest to me."
Actually I think Moving Pictures is everybody's favorite Rush album...