• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Double Bass Thick vs thin neck

Sep 26, 2011
6,855
16,334
So, the general scuttlebutt seems to be that a particularly thin neck is not very good for double bass. The little experience I have had with basses with noticeably thinner necks than mine (which I think is probably kind of average) seems to bear out that the thin necks aren't as efficient.

So why is a thin neck always listed as such a good thing on electric bass? I think the finger spread for one finger per fret on EB is about the same as the finger spread for 1-2-4 double bass fingering. It seems that the same issue of too thin a neck actually making it harder to cover the spread would apply to electric as to upright.

I only play the most rudimentary electric bass, so maybe I'm missing something here.
 
I agree that with DB too thin of a neck can be a problem. With BG, I just think it's a different animal because so much less force is required. What I do with the shoulder/elbow on the DB gets done with the wrist and a tiny amount of elbow on the BG. The strings are also so much looser and lower, and in my limited experience (especially recently) I don't see any real plus side to a thicker BG neck.
 
  • Like
Reactions: robobass
I think the scale length, string height and even the frets themselves make a difference; much less force required on EB.

Some players prefer the wider, thicker precision neck. I play differently on a jazz vs precision, even more so on a DB. granted im self taught, and only really play DB in bluegrass; but still i view them and play them differently.

Now as far as tone- EB relies on amps and preamps, so neck in relation to tone is an afterthought for most, IMO. But you could look at a wider/thicker EB neck as a way to generate better tone, before it even hits the pickup- then you can make a case for a bigger neck.

Dont know if i missed the point here....
 
Last edited:
I have a German flat back I rebuilt from wreckage about 15 years ago. I made the neck quite thin at that time. It seemed most comfortable at the time. Having played a lot more bass since, , when I rebuilt a round back czech bass about about 5 years ago, I left the neck "fat". It is much easier on my hands now than the thin one is. I plan on eventually adding a non-tapered shim under the thin one's fingerboard. If it were I, I'd stick with a "fat" neck. Not for structural reasons, or sound, but for comfort of the left hand.

Steven
 
My main player is a German with a thick neck , definitely a bit thicker than most thick necks . Somehow
its easier to nail the notes for me with a chunkier neck - its almost as if the neck pulls my hand into the optimum grip if that makes sense.I also somehow find it less fatiguing . I was not gifted with large hands but I do find that I have to watch my tuning more on my thin necked instruments
 
Has anyone here had a "too thick" double bass neck trimmed down?
I had mine thinned a bit recently. I had a new fingerboard put on a few years ago that added about 4-5mm to the overall thickness of the neck. Other players and luthiers agreed that it seemed well above average, so I had a luthier shave about 4mm off, which was agreed to leave plenty of maple in the neck.

Talking to a good luthier is the most important thing, as well as talking with other players/teachers if you don't have a ton of experience playing different basses to know what's "normal." A too-thin neck can warp, is not great for left hand technique, and could impact resale value. On the other hand, a too-thick neck that keeps your grip spread too wide can add a lot of tension to the left hand.
 
  • Like
Reactions: robobass and Fleo