I have a very important question that I feel needs answering
Why do people say that you need to find someone who KNOWS ricks really well to set one up? Why are they so much more different than a Fender or something like that? Are they? I think a bass is just a bass, am I wrong?
Like many things in life, basses have to balance the line between form and function.
Fenders (and "Fenderesque" instruments like Sadowsky and Lakland) tend lean toward function, Ricks lean to form (yes yes, just IMO)
Fenders are seen so often live and in the studio, they become "boring".
That's why people can tend to gas so hard for Ricks --so shiny and all that chrome-- and be utterly disappointed at how hard they can be to live with.
Dual trussrods can intimidate techs, thin necks that can bend and bow with roundwounds (older 4001s), binding that pinches the plucking arm, a pickup cover that gets in the way, single coils that can pick up a 60 hz hum from a flourescent light a mile away, and a bridge design that seems deliberately designed to be frustrating -- are some of the main culprits.
I lived with my 4003 for over 10 years. As much as I loved the idea of having a Rick, I enjoyed playing other basses even more. My Aria Pro was more comfortable and sounded just as good to me (different, but just as good) and recorded so much easier.
In college I swapped my Ric w/ a buddies Fender Jazz for a day. It wasn't long after that I sold the Rick.
And of course many of the famous bass players we associate w/ Ricks have moved on as well. Nothing at all against the bass, but it's worth noting that it happens, especially when remarks are made about forum members who somehow are unable to make a certain bass work.
There's just too many good basses today at any price point that it's not just about making it work, it's about preference and playing what makes you happy.
Peace.
