• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Thunderbird Club

All my custom basses are poly - by Pat Wilkins. I don't cater to the poly vs nitro debate as todays poly is every bit as good or better than lacquer. The mystique for me is only about a '50s-'60s vintage bass and how it's amber'd/aged, worn and shrunk over time. Otherwise - (thin) poly rules. (and please spare me the "nitro finishes sounds better than poly" claptrap) :)

View attachment 5057469 View attachment 5057470 View attachment 5057471 View attachment 5057472

That is a wild collection of basses! Really cool. Love the two gold ones especially (cue Goldmember in Austin Powers - "I love gooooold")
 
When I first joined BG, we tried to learn "View to a Kill" but it never got off the ground.

Here's a Bond theme that never was - too bad because it would be my favorite.


I don't remember which movie it was when Bond says "what difference does it make" when asked if he wants his martini shaken or stirred. I also don't remember who played Bond, just that I enjoyed the movie. It was about Bond, not gagets.
 
That is a wild collection of basses! Really cool. Love the two gold ones especially (cue Goldmember in Austin Powers - "I love gooooold")

:) Thanks! Firemist Gold Metallic - late '60s Pontiac GTO finish.

0501pon_02z1970_Pontiac_GTODrivers_Side_View.jpg
 
All my custom basses are poly - by Pat Wilkins. I don't cater to the poly vs nitro debate as todays poly is every bit as good or better than lacquer. The mystique for me is only about a '50s-'60s vintage bass and how it's amber'd/aged, worn and shrunk over time. Otherwise - (thin) poly rules. (and please spare me the "nitro finishes sounds better than poly" claptrap) :)

View attachment 5057469 View attachment 5057470 View attachment 5057471 View attachment 5057472


Claptrap: I realize that people here argue about that, I don't, I just like it. :laugh: I like thin finishes and like the looks of nitro, also the last three Fenders and two T-birds I bought all have have lacquer finishes.
 
Last edited:
Claptrap: They do. :laugh:

I know you're kidding, but actually they 'did' when CBS/Fender did their thick poly coatings in the '70s. Thin lacquer coatings on acoustic instruments yes - but a solid hunk of wood being "choked" by a thick poly coating is marginally (if at all) an issue - it really comes down to durability and 'looks' and has nothing perceivable to do with tone.
 
I know you're kidding, but actually they 'did' when CBS/Fender did their thick poly coatings in the '70s. Thin lacquer coatings on acoustic instruments yes - but a solid hunk of wood being "choked" by a thick poly coating is marginally (if at all) an issue - it really comes down to durability and 'looks' and has nothing perceivable to do with tone.


I completely changed that post. I don't know if it sounds better or not really, I think the whole package creates the sound as well as the player. I just like it.
 
All my custom basses are poly - by Pat Wilkins. I don't cater to the poly vs nitro debate as todays poly is every bit as good or better than lacquer. The mystique for me is only about a '50s-'60s vintage bass and how it's amber'd/aged, worn and shrunk over time. Otherwise - (thin) poly rules. (and please spare me the "nitro finishes sounds better than poly" claptrap) :)

View attachment 5057469 View attachment 5057470 View attachment 5057471 View attachment 5057472
We really have no choice here in Cali.
 

Latest posts