Cool - for how long? If you end up in Hamburg, stop in and say hello to Rudolf Rock & his wife at Zwick -
View attachment 5376557 View attachment 5376558 View attachment 5376560
Till the 21st.
Won’t make it to Hamburg.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Cool - for how long? If you end up in Hamburg, stop in and say hello to Rudolf Rock & his wife at Zwick -
View attachment 5376557 View attachment 5376558 View attachment 5376560
Yeah, that was a real money-maker. No wonder people on guitar forums are begging Gibson to do it again.Hold on now, they did make the L5S...... Yuck
I think the larger neck/nut width, smaller headstock and tuners are to reduce the number of broken headstocks.I have brought this up but the answers really didn't make much sense. I was told that it would be to expensive to make one 60s spec. So instead they literally did a redesign, makes absolutely no sense. Making a 60s style pg and putting the pickup in the 60s location would have in no way added to development cost or finished product , if anything development cost would have been less.
While I appreciate the 2021 NRs three things keep them from being spectacular. Lack of 60s pickup position, 60s two piece tune O matic bridge and a 1.5 nut. Missed it by that much. Oh one more thing, a big headstock with big tuners.
Going to a show next week..............
![]()
Possibly in part but It's more to reduced the much made about neck dive. The reduction of the headstock angle and thicker headstock are more important in deterring breakage.I think the larger neck/nut width, smaller headstock and tuners are to reduce the number of broken headstocks.
A scarf joint would have been smart, but they seem to have forgotten how to do those.Possibly in part but It's more reduced the much made about neck dive. The reduction of the headstock angle and thicker headstock are more important in deterring breakage.
I already have some y'alls addresses....
Poop Senders - The ULTIMATE Gag Gift - SWEET Revenge at its FINEST
I'll take the Combo Pack. More bang for the buck!
That doesn't explain pickup placement.I think the larger neck/nut width, smaller headstock and tuners are to reduce the number of broken headstocks.
More off topic.
See ya’ll from the other side of pond.
View attachment 5376718 View attachment 5376719
More off topic.
See ya’ll from the other side of pond.
View attachment 5376718 View attachment 5376719
That doesn't explain pickup placement.
I suppose, but that's not an issue on a neck-through design like a Ric or Thunderbird. Especially not where Thunderbird pickup placement goes. Ric has a neck pickup up in more or less mudbucker location. Thunderbirds have it nearer a Precision-like sweet spot.I’ve heard on other basses - Rickenbiscuits maybe - that pickups have moved south because being too close to the neck causes a weakness.
Could be the same here on the set neck? Personally I don’t think so but I can’t think of any real answer?
Don't overdo it on the schnitzengruben.
Safe travels brother!More off topic.
See ya’ll from the other side of pond.
View attachment 5376718 View attachment 5376719