• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Thunderbird Club

Hold on now, they did make the L5S...... Yuck
Yeah, that was a real money-maker. No wonder people on guitar forums are begging Gibson to do it again.

Goes along with my name being Earl...and other things that aren't true!

They learned their lesson to barely tinker with something when it was pay dirt. With guitars anyway.
 
Well poopie, my set of S.I.T. 5 string flats are out for delivery and I’m not close to having the bass ready….

I still have one tuna post hole to fill and relocate…. 3 to enlarge… cut a new nut…. Fit and space 3 of the saddles…. And decide if I’m indexing the nut on one of the tunas so it doesn’t interfere with the trc or if I’m going with smaller post size on the two treble side tunas…
 
I have brought this up but the answers really didn't make much sense. I was told that it would be to expensive to make one 60s spec. So instead they literally did a redesign, makes absolutely no sense. Making a 60s style pg and putting the pickup in the 60s location would have in no way added to development cost or finished product , if anything development cost would have been less.
While I appreciate the 2021 NRs three things keep them from being spectacular. Lack of 60s pickup position, 60s two piece tune O matic bridge and a 1.5 nut. Missed it by that much. Oh one more thing, a big headstock with big tuners.
I think the larger neck/nut width, smaller headstock and tuners are to reduce the number of broken headstocks.
 
Going to a show next week..............

GCFk2Jn.jpg
 
I think the larger neck/nut width, smaller headstock and tuners are to reduce the number of broken headstocks.
Possibly in part but It's more to reduced the much made about neck dive. The reduction of the headstock angle and thicker headstock are more important in deterring breakage.
 
Last edited:
I’ve heard on other basses - Rickenbiscuits maybe - that pickups have moved south because being too close to the neck causes a weakness.

Could be the same here on the set neck? Personally I don’t think so but I can’t think of any real answer?
I suppose, but that's not an issue on a neck-through design like a Ric or Thunderbird. Especially not where Thunderbird pickup placement goes. Ric has a neck pickup up in more or less mudbucker location. Thunderbirds have it nearer a Precision-like sweet spot.

I'm at a loss, except that it's Gibson being Gibson.