• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Thunderbird Club

In my mind, that thread equates to a bad carpenter blaming his/her tools.

I have played & recorded, Gibson, Fender, Rickenbacker, Spector and a few others. At they end of it all, I hear me. Good and bad.

The basses help point you in different creative directions and the tonal differences are real and contribute as well.


This is my exact attitude also. Different tool for different jobs. I have to adjust how I play for each instrument whether that be my Spector, BaCH, Ibanez, or Bird.
 
Pretty ugly indeed. Same here, had to just get out.

I can think of some pretty high end, Crazy expensive basses that I wouldn’t play if you gave em to me unless I found myself in some ‘concept’ band that all dressed like wizards or something. That doesn’t mean I’m gonna jump in on every thread and bum out the folks who happen to like em
 
And the whole Jazz bass thing. It works for what it does, in the right situation. But as I had posted a bit back. The traditional single coil thing stopped working for me months ago. Hence the stacked humbuckers going into it.
There's definitely a place for a Jazz, but I don't think it's as versatile as a Bird. A big factor is the annoying 60 cycle hum you get if the pickups aren't set at the same volume.
 
Don't get me wrong there's a tool for every job, I have a Jazz, a Precision, and a 4HH Ray. But at least one person said something along the lines of a Jazz being very versatile tone-wise, which I highly disagree with. A Jazz is truly the polar opposite of a Bird, anemic single coil pickups. As for a Ray, if it's a standard 4H, than ya it is very different as well, but at least it is still a fairly aggressive sounding bass compared to a Jazz. But like you said, neither are, in any way, similar to a 'Bird.

Honestly I've only ever seen negativity on that forum. I bet if you went over there and made a thread saying how you love Marshal Plexi's, there'd be nothing but people saying how they suck.
I love plexi Marshalls! My '72 Major mine since '83, my main amp for years.
1513524003721305142897.jpg
 
And the whole Jazz bass thing. It works for what it does, in the right situation. But as I had posted a bit back. The traditional single coil thing stopped working for me months ago. Hence the stacked humbuckers going into it.

Lots for folks can make a single coil Jazz bass sound awesome, but I ain’t one of em. The balance and ergonomics can be pretty great though. About two years ago, I tried really hard to embrace the J thing. Bought a really nice Fender CS 60’s style, played one gig with it and flipped it. It’s now someone else’s dream bass, which makes me very happy. Just before that, I traded something for a Lakland J with an East JRetro pre. Couldn’t ditch that thing fast enough. Then best one by far was a 60’s style Bluesman Vintage. I had my tech wire in a series/parallel switch. Better still, but at that point I just had to accept I’m not a J bass kinda dude. Nearly decided to put some Lollar ‘Bird pickups in it, but decided it just needed to move along. Can’t say I didn’t try, but they just don’t seem to be for me. Now when I see a cool looking J, I just think of what I’d replace the pickups with
 
Last edited:
I love plexi Marshalls! My '72 Major mine since '83, my main amp for years.
View attachment 2845949

Man, you have insanely great taste in gear!

My birds sounded pretty good through a Genz.
Just saying

I’ve tried mine through my main 3 amps. Mesa D800, Mesa M9 and Reiner 6SL7 tube pre with a Crest power amp. There might be a way to make that bass sound bad, but I haven’t found it yet :)
 
There's definitely a place for a Jazz, but I don't think it's as versatile as a Bird. A big factor is the annoying 60 cycle hum you get if the pickups aren't set at the same volume.

Agreed. And a Bird is so much more versatlie then a Jazz, and just in general. Way more so then some give it credit for.
 
Lots for folks can make a single coil Jazz bass sound awesome, but I ain’t one of em. The balance and ergonomics can be pretty great though. About two years ago, I tried really hard to embrace the J thing. Bought a really nice Fender CS 60’s style, played one gig with it and flipped it. It’s now someone else’s dream bass, which makes me very happy. Just before that, I traded something for a Lakland J with an East JRetro pre. Couldn’t ditch that thing fast enough. Then best one by far was a 60’s style Bluesman Vintage. I had my tech wire in a series/parallel switch. Better still, but at that point I just had to accept I’m not a J bass kinda dude. Nearly decided to put some Lollar ‘Bird pickups in it, but decided it just needed to move along. Can’t say I didn’t try, but they just don’t seem to be for me. Now when I see a cool looking J, I just think of what I’d replace the pickups with

I was so on the edge of chopping up the Jazz to put Bird pup's in it. Now I'm one of those that loves everything about it, except for the usual tone of it. I think the stacked buckers are going to do the trick.
 
Agreed. And a Bird is so much more versatlie then a Jazz, and just in general. Way more so then some give it credit for.

Which is why I want another one to string with flats for my country gigs :)

...actually, it's how Tort is made, but don't tell anyone, it's a secret. :rolleyes:

Well, it was :)
 
And the whole Jazz bass thing. It works for what it does, in the right situation. But as I had posted a bit back. The traditional single coil thing stopped working for me months ago. Hence the stacked humbuckers going into it.

Geddy plays a jazz, so it can't be wrong. Of course, he also has and plays a collection of thunderbirds, so those aren't wrong either. But Geddy always sounds like Geddy. And I think that is a combination of his technique and processing; large appliances have their own unique tone.