• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Thunderbird Club

The trick with Gen Pop is not to go into 'this vs that' threads, or 'What's your opinion' threads. Staying out of the 'Basses' sub-forum is a good idea too (with here being the obvious exception).

I try to limit myself to threads that someone is having a problem with their amp or bass, basically just trying to learn what to do if I ever come across that problem.

I’m always checking stuff out. The Luthiers Corner section is amazing. Some seriously talented folks there.

I also enjoy basses in general. Even ones that don’t interest me personally. They interest someone and it’s enjoyable getting their point of view. I’m not saying I’ll never try another active bass again, but I’ve tried enough that I seriously doubt it. I still find the subject interesting enough.
 
This is my only means of social media, I had a Facebook profile full of people I knew that didnt offer the comfort I get here. Im not sure if thats sad or what. I do have a life that I take full advantage of because apparently I only get one chance at it but when Im free and not looking to keep moving physically I find comfort in being right here with all of you.
With the exception of using it to message a few people, I only go on Facebook, at most, a couple times a month. People on there are really fvcked, and can talk about anything they want, I don't need to know that you just ate a poutine!
 
With the exception of using it to message a few people, I only go on Facebook, at most, a couple times a month. People on there are really fvcked, and can talk about anything they want, I don't need to know that you just ate a poutine!
:laugh: yeah right, I dont need to be updated every time a person eats freshly fried bannock with a side of pemmican either.
 
At some point try a '76, they're a very different 'Bird from a Post '88. I'm not a small person, when I play mine it always seems that I'm playing a "big" bass, the large headstock and extra metal on the bridge and pickup covers seems to just add to the effect. They're not always held in high regard by some purists, mostly due the pickups being of a completely different design than the '60s type, that has some pretty wild variations in output due to less than great QC from Gibson at that point, though the woodwork is in general pretty good.

The ‘76 Birds might be my favorite, visually, especially the natural mahogany or walnut finishes. I have played a couple over the years and yeah, the 60’s sound and feel is more to my liking. Though some of my all time favorite Gibson basses are from the 70’s, QC and weight was all over the map. Honestly, my 2014 is a terrific bass and a nice middle ground, tonally. I think mine looks fantastic too, but I’m biased :)
 
I’m always checking stuff out. The Luthiers Corner section is amazing. Some seriously talented folks there.

I also enjoy basses in general. Even ones that don’t interest me personally. They interest someone and it’s enjoyable getting their point of view. I’m not saying I’ll never try another active bass again, but I’ve tried enough that I seriously doubt it. I still find the subject interesting enough.

One good active bass is a nice choice to have for some live situations, I do prefer my passive 'Birds in general but sometimes, playing my Jackson Bird just scratches a sonic itch I didn't even know I had
 
Anybody know about this?. Claims to "offer better range of sound" options than a Thunderbird.
Invalid Link Removed

There are "things" from the land of P and J on it :roflmao:
 
Anybody know about this?. Claims to "offer better range of sound" options than a Thunderbird.
Invalid Link Removed

Looks kinda awkward to me. It’s also a PJ so of course it would offer different sounds, but ‘better?’ I’ve PJ’s that sounded great, but when I want a Bird I also want THAT sound. Just my take
 
At some point try a '76, they're a very different 'Bird from a Post '88. I'm not a small person, when I play mine it always seems that I'm playing a "big" bass, the large headstock and extra metal on the bridge and pickup covers seems to just add to the effect. They're not always held in high regard by some purists, mostly due the pickups being of a completely different design than the '60s type, that has some pretty wild variations in output due to less than great QC from Gibson at that point, though the woodwork is in general pretty good.
Having picked up one of yours made me think about those differences. The balance is different from any of mine. I don't recall it being particularly heavy or awkward, just different. The size of the neck was great, if I remember it right. It's rounder, more of a handful than the new ones. I flat don't remember which one it was, though. Thanks, by the way! Someday, I would like to find out what a '60s reverse 'Bird is like. Until then, the '91 is going to be my fake '60s version.

Sound is so dependent upon strings and amp and player that it's hard to make any kind of judgment about what a given bass really sounds like until you play it through your usual signal chain. Even then, I find that what sounded good yesterday doesn't work today and I end up twiddling a knob or slider somewhere to fix whatever is bothersome.
 
The ‘76 Birds might be my favorite, visually, especially the natural mahogany or walnut finishes. I have played a couple over the years and yeah, the 60’s sound and feel is more to my liking. Though some of my all time favorite Gibson basses are from the 70’s, QC and weight was all over the map. Honestly, my 2014 is a terrific bass and a nice middle ground, tonally. I think mine looks fantastic too, but I’m biased :)

76's do fine with a good amp, for overall tone I really like them a lot. Playing live my '89 gets the call a lot of late, it's well broken in as a player and Lull pups are pretty sweet.
 
One good active bass is a nice choice to have for some live situations, I do prefer my passive 'Birds in general but sometimes, playing my Jackson Bird just scratches a sonic itch I didn't even know I had

There you go! I’d rock an active bass if I find one that has something I need going on. For me, every active bass I’ve ever owned (some pretty high end ones too) just always sounded better to me passive. I’m not dissing active basses, I’ve just never found one that’s right for me
 
Looks kinda awkward to me. It’s also a PJ so of course it would offer different sounds, but ‘better?’ I’ve PJ’s that sounded great, but when I want a Bird I also want THAT sound. Just my take
I like what I get from my Bird, I like the P bass as well so I have considered the possibilities of acquiring another Bird just to add the split coils. In time.
 
Looks kinda awkward to me. It’s also a PJ so of course it would offer different sounds, but ‘better?’ I’ve PJ’s that sounded great, but when I want a Bird I also want THAT sound. Just my take
I just read that review. I wonder if the author has ever played a real Thunderbird. They aren't for everybody, but his comments sound like what you would say if you never played one.
 
It really is only a p/j configuration on a Thunderbird body tweak.


I do like it visually, it's an odd mash up of Thunderbird parts, better than that other one that came out recently.
 
76's do fine with a good amp, for overall tone I really like them a lot. Playing live my '89 gets the call a lot of late, it's well broken in as a player and Lull pups are pretty sweet.

Trust me, I’d buy a ‘76 in a heartbeat if I could!

I am kinda on the lookout for a couple new amps, so we’ll see. If feels kinda funny not having some big iron in my life