Hope it didn’t seem like I was dissing Dingwall. I’ve owned a Super J and think they do remarkable work. Nothing but respect for them!
When I think of a Gibson T Bird, they’re just a bit brutish and old school. Big sounding, but somewhat unrefined. I happen to like that a lot and it works well not only with my personal aesthetic, but also for a lot of the gigs I play. The D Bird is more ‘sophisticated.’ That’s not a bad thing by any stretch, but it’s not gonna be for everyone, just as a Gibson T Bird isn’t for everyone. As for the Dingwall headstock, I’ve just grown to know and love that big a$$ clumsy looking headstock on a Gibson, so my mind has to adjust to the more elegant D Bird headstock. It’s more of a personal thing, not negative judgement intended toward the Dingwall. I also gravitate more toward natural finishes or 60’s type paint jobs. The Dingwall thing is by and large, very brash and modern when it comes to visuals. That’s awesome if it’s what you’re looking for. For me, it’s just a bit ‘much.’ As a pick player, it would also take some getting used to having all 3(!) pickups right under where I like to pick.
As for the sound. It’s totally cool if anyone likes that more modern thing Dingwall does. I like it too, but that’s not the sound I think of with a Gibson T Bird. Heck, for all I know I’ll wind up with one at some point for what it does. I was just curious what everyone here does and doesn’t like about em