• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Thunderbird Club

I was surprised I could still dead lift close to 100pds. Not sure I could do that on a regular basis. But it's worth it's weight in gold in the tone department.
It could be worse. I still schlep around an Acoustic 361 Power Plus cabinet that's got to weigh close to 150 lbs. Up and down steps is all about technique.
 
It was bad in the early 1980s when I lived there. Driving a cab was pure combat driving, especially in a Checker. Those were the worst cars ever made.

Agreed, riding in one of those was enough to shake and break your body into pieces. I swear those things had no suspension what so ever.
 
I-5 by the Tacoma Dome, where time goes to die.

One day a couple years ago, I was stuck on 1-5 south just north of the Tacoma Dome, and I could see three separate house fires in different directions from the traffic jam I was stuck in. It was a defining moment. There probably ought to be a song about it.

I-5 through Tacoma is the insertion point for Washington State's enema.
Tacoma, I hate you so!
 
She already has one…
I'm thinking:
1467314569000_1244336.jpg

Remember, this is Kat, not just some ordinary bass player.
 
So... Is the cutaway deeper on the CP and VP compared to the Gibson or not?

To the naked eye it sure looks like the cutaway is deeper - Or at least the lower wing is shifted slightly backwards compared to a Gibson

View attachment 2951991
View attachment 2951990

To my eyes it appears that the upper bout starts at the 15th fret on both basses, whereas the lower cutaway starts at the 16th fret on the CP and at the 15th on the Gibson.

Also the rear end of the two have different angles with the CP having a more vertical slope to account for the lower wing being shifted more backwards than on the Gibson - That would also account for the bridge appearing to be slightly more forward than on the Gibson.

If you take a close look on the pictures, it seems that bridge is more or less in the same position on the upper wing on both basses, but not on the lower wing.

So at least on my CP the neck seems to be in the same position as on the Gibson - only the lower wing is shifted backwards...

Needless to say this is not 100% accurate but tracing the Epi and superimposing it over the Gibson via vellum gives some insight as to differences. I tried to line up the fret markers so that remained a constant and the pick-guard and knobs more or less look to be in the same location on both.

fullsizeoutput_ed2.jpeg
 

Latest posts