The web master has screwed the pooch on this one.

TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Well, it's no wonder, really.... Fender's come by the gazillions and have used that same old tired design for 65 years, and Squire G&L Lakland and Sadowsky are basically "just" copies of that design, so there's nothing new to get excited about there either (however good they may be).
The Thunderbird you don't see that often, and it really does stand out in the sea of bland 7ender and 7ender lokalikes...
I do think the Rick's do stand out as well, though...
Dude... We just finished a Wed nite jam at a bar in Westport.MA, and we did Ziggy Stardust!! And we nailed it. I've wanted to.play that song for YEARS!! And we did it. It's not that I'm so elated, it's that it was my thank-you that I got to say. Might sound stupid or useless, but I got to do it. And I played it on my Thunderbird bass. Somehing is right with the world.
Yes, Thunderbirds are becoming more apparent in the music scene, but nowhere near as plentyful as 7enders.
And yes, Thunderbirds go way back to 1963 - But have had several changes along the way, like the NR's. Also they've been in and out of production several times, which the 7enders haven't...
Thunderbirds, aside from the body shape change in 1966, have had relatively few changes in its 39ish years of production.
My P will remain a stand-by, because it does something distinctly different than the T-Bird. And it does tend to stand up and hold it's own space in a mix like nothing else.Fenders are more plentiful because 9 times out of 10, they sound better in a mix. Having recorded with a Tbird and a P, I can attest to this, as many others likely would as well.
Thunderbirds, aside from the body shape change in 1966, have had relatively few changes in its 39ish years of production.
Ritter and Crossrock makes some nice affordable ones specific for Thunderbirds...
There's also Rockbag as well, but they are a bit more expensive, and there are a few others as well...
I have one and love it! I think the following year they put the new EB pickups and controls in the Bird, now that would truly be a weird species.
I would agree, a long-standing back-burner GAS of mine is a Fireglo Rick. Had a Jetglo 4003 that I bought used back in '82 but got rid of it in '83 due to unfixable neck/truss rod issues.
This is true, especially in some registers on the neck. I find the sound of my 'Bird tends to get lost with guitars if I go too high on the neck. There's an easy solution to that, though. There are also some things that a 'Bird was never intended to do. We were playing Folsom Prison Blues last night, and that song on a Thunderbird is a bit of a non-sequitor. 'Birds aren't exactly wallflowers that are happy sitting in the background thumping away.Fenders are more plentiful because 9 times out of 10, they sound better in a mix. Having recorded with a Tbird and a P, I can attest to this, as many others likely would as well.
Thunderbirds, aside from the body shape change in 1966, have had relatively few changes in its 39ish years of production.



So you have the model with the EB pickups and controls with coil splitting, correct? I bet that sounds sweet!This is true, especially in some registers on the neck. I find the sound of my 'Bird tends to get lost with guitars if I go too high on the neck. There's an easy solution to that, though. There are also some things that a 'Bird was never intended to do. We were playing Folsom Prison Blues last night, and that song on a Thunderbird is a bit of a non-sequitor. 'Birds aren't exactly wallflowers that are happy sitting in the background thumping away.
That's one of the reasons I bought a 2015 - those pickups have a bit more ability to dial back from the usual Thunderbird aggression. Oddity aside, I'm expecting the 2015 to end up challenging for the most playing time. I really like those pickups a lot, and I put a Babicz on the 1991, so you know what I think about that bridge.
For what its worth, I find Thunderbird aggression easier to channel than Ric aggression. I never did quite corral the Ric, even after a couple years and a number of string changes.
I had put it in the shop to be fixed but Rick's apparently have two truss rods and they are octagonal shaped (not sure why that had any bearing) and the shop was having a hard time getting replacements. After probably 3 months or more I gave up and traded it in for a new Hamer Blitz. Haven't really regretted it but in the past few years the GAS has been slowly burning on the back-burner. If they weren't so expensive, to my budget anyway, I'd probably be playing one already.Everything is "fixable" unless you tossed it into the fire.
Just sayin...
Agree on all counts!I had an EB and the 2015 'Bird should be arriving tomorrow. The EB is why I wanted a 2015 Thunderbird. My ears think 7ender Jazz basses sound nasal and whiny. It's a minority opinion, but that doesn't faze anybody around here. The EB could do all kinds of things, but its ergos were too 7ender-ish relative to what I like.
Here's a pic of my Gibby in full Fender cammo mode...
It's the Ninja bass from Memphis.First thing I thought was why is he posting a pic of three 7enders?!![]()

Long time to wait fer sher.I had put it in the shop to be fixed but Rick's apparently have two truss rods and they are octagonal shaped (not sure why that had any bearing) and the shop was having a hard time getting replacements. After probably 3 months or more I gave up and traded it in for a new Hamer Blitz. Haven't really regretted it but in the past few years the GAS has been slowly burning on the back-burner. If they weren't so expensive, to my budget anyway, I'd probably be playing one already.You're right though, everything is fixable, just came down to time in my case on this one. Plus at the time, I only had two basses, the Rick and a F word! So I was stuck playing the F word and not really liking it.
![]()