• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Thunderbird Club

So if I'm not mistaken, the strap pin on the Eagle was moved from the back of the upper horn to the top. thoughts on how this would change things?

View attachment 3526704

The way someone altered it is a conventional location. The way it was designed was a move toward a rear facing peg, which is not conventional but has been done just the same. Both work, but having it on the back necessitates reversing the strap if you use the Dunlop Strap-Lok system.
 
Last edited:
The strap pins on my Warlock are both on the backside, it is very comfortable and balanced really well
Thanks. I figure it's because of the pointy nature of the horn on the Warlock. In this case, it's really not much of a difference with respect to the distance from the 12th fret, just basically 45˚ around the horn.
 
Last edited:
The way someone altered it is a conventional location. The way it was designed was a move toward a rear facing peg, which is not conventional but has been done just the same. Both work, but having it on the back necessitates reversing the strap system if you use the Dunlop Strap-Lok system.
Yeah, it was a little weird in the beginning with the Thunderbird's location at the neck heel, but it's just different. I'm curious if it changes the stability of how it hangs (I'll just ahem myself).
 
The way someone altered it is a conventional location. The way it was designed was a move toward a rear facing peg, which is not conventional but has been done just the same. Both work, but having it on the back necessitates reversing the strap system if you use the Dunlop Strap-Lok system.
Which would be fine if he’s using the same strap as he uses on a thunderbird :smug:
 
Thanks. I figure it's because of the pointy nature of the horn on the Warlock. In this case, it's really not much of a different with respect to the distance from the 12th fret, just basically 45˚ around the horn.
Well my Jackson Randy Rhodes (6 string) has the bottom pin on the bottom of the... point... instead of the back. But much prefer the warlock strap pins.
Ya it’s weird that it’s on the bevel. Instead of the back.
 
Well my Jackson Randy Rhodes (6 string) has the bottom pin on the bottom of the... point... instead of the back. But much prefer the warlock strap pins.
Ya it’s weird that it’s on the bevel. Instead of the back.
Yeah, who knows what they were thinking in 1976. Or what whoever used to own it was thinking when they moved it to the top of the horn and left what I assume was the original location looking like a cauterized wound.
 
Well my Jackson Randy Rhodes (6 string) has the bottom pin on the bottom of the... point... instead of the back. But much prefer the warlock strap pins.
Ya it’s weird that it’s on the bevel. Instead of the back.

From a design point-of-view, I like the top peg on the back of the upper horn and the lower peg off-center toward the E-string on the side. This utilizes the strap in an optimal fashion and makes for the bass resting against your body nicely. But like I said, the conventional way also works so it's more of an individual preference.
 
From a design point-of-view, I like the top peg on the back of the upper horn and the lower peg off-center toward the E-string on the side. This utilizes the strap in an optimal fashion and makes for the bass resting against your body nicely. But like I said, the conventional way also works so it's more of an individual preference.
I’ll try to get a representative picture of the back of my warlock
 
It's bizarre that the bass GP seems to think Birds are niche instruments. They seem capable of most anything. (Even flight, as demonstrated elsewhere.)
They are very much all purpose. They can our P and P (and I do love them) and out J a J. They do everything but super modern or thin and wimpy.:rollno: But then again, why would you want any of that in the first place?;)
 
It's bizarre that the bass GP seems to think Birds are niche instruments. They seem capable of most anything. (Even flight, as demonstrated elsewhere.)

Roots dub/reggae, crunchy 80s rock. 'Nuff said.

P.s. I'll start posting sounds from live gigs when I can, as I'm getting my amp dialed in, and would like to know myself how I'm doing at it. Using other people's ears is a great way of finding out!
 
Yeah, it was a little weird in the beginning with the Thunderbird's location at the neck heel, but it's just different. I'm curious if it changes the stability of how it hangs (I'll just ahem myself).
My take on it is that whoever moved it preferred a more static and horizontal neck. Like a 7ender or Ric. If you like to move the neck around and have it more vertical some or all the time, having the pin on the back allows the rotation necessary for that. I am a pin on the back person. Take that with the usual disclaimers.
 
The ‘15 and Goth posed for a pic today. Last one before the new Epi Pelham Blue arrives. Hope everyone had a nice Thunderbird weekend!

7781424B-FCFE-4791-BF72-6EC27C469712.jpeg