• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Thunderbird Club

Well thanks for the chiming in about the poor old mistreated Fender combo. Walking on by it most likely!

And now back to our regular program...

Here's the new, improved Pro IV, thanks and shouts out to Larry V and Klondike!
IMG_20160226_202357090.jpg
 
@Count Bassie, I'm so happy you like the PG and it sure does look great filling up the whole lower horn! I can't wait to see what your daughter does artistically with it!

Dude that's it- filling up that space with that pg does it for me... I may well be done with any more cosmetic mods after this.
I spoke to my daughter about the artwork... Going for something minimal but dramatic. And it'll have to get along with the Raven looking image there on the upper bout...
 
Thanks, yes this is a black one I am in the process of buying.
Interested you say "fat neck".
The specs say 1.5 inches at the nut, which is pretty narrow.
Do you mean in depth?
I actually generally think of "fat neck" versus "thin neck" as a front to back thickness, rather than nut width.

The question had to do with a Fender Rumble 350 combo that had an original driver and a Carvin replacement driver... The Carvin was replacing a Pyle driver that was in there previously. I was trying to discern if the Carvin was OK matched with the original one. I think my mention of the Pyle had stolen the thunder, as it were, from the question...

And yeah, curiously there is a lot of avoiding brusqueness out there in the general population. To bad.
Does it sound okay?

If the two drivers are close enough in spec, it should be all right.