Pies aren’t squared, Pies are round, Cakes are squared!Pi stinks, but I love it.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Pies aren’t squared, Pies are round, Cakes are squared!Pi stinks, but I love it.
hmmm...there is only one meter as opposed to numerous types of foot (at one time)..Sure it is.
All depends on who is the cook.Pies aren’t squared, Pies are round, Cakes are squared!
e and pi are transcendental numbers...their only 'irrationality' stemming from the fact that they are tied in to a base 10 numbering system.....in retrospect, we would have been further ahead if instead of basing our numbering system on 10 (the number of fingers we have) we would have based it on 2 (the number of hands we have)....but of course that would have been way too cumbersome at the time..Pi has also gone metric. 3.14159... is way too much for metrisexuals[pi] to remember, so under the Billyboingers numeric system, pi became 1. Unfortunately, that caused problems up and down the number line, so the Billyboingers method was immediately replaced with the Jadedstrumpet method where e was 1, which came with its own issues. Thus a many, varied, ever-changing, and eternal[1] series of numbering methods was born.
Meanwhile, us "flatliners" (as the metrisexuals like to call us) are stuck here in the stone ages with e and pi and such full of (among other things) irrational numbers, happily counting away without having to name a new system before we've even figured out what the old one was based on.
Bonus question: Provide the equation describing a THUNDERBIRD.
[1] Not unlike the Dark Arts.[2]
[2] As related by Professor Severus Snape
[3.14] Those who find the metric system too sexy for its body[e]
[e] Not to be confused with metrosexuals
It could be worse. You could have as set of Whitworth as well.The USA has converted several times.
I grew up on the old methods. Being a multi-interest geek (with special interest in radio, electronics, and audio), I learned metric as well. The best part (ha ha) is owning two sets of tools- one SAE & etc., and one metric.
Yes, and a metric, left-handed, electric ball-peen hammer.
I been lookin' fer one o' thems.'Course in yer part o' the country ya hafta be wary of the 'cow pi.'Pi has also gone metric. 3.14159... is way too much for metrisexuals[pi] to remember, so under the Billyboingers numeric system, pi became 1. Unfortunately, that caused problems up and down the number line, so the Billyboingers method was immediately replaced with the Jadedstrumpet method where e was 1, which came with its own issues. Thus a many, varied, ever-changing, and eternal[1] series of numbering methods was born.
Meanwhile, us "flatliners" (as the metrisexuals like to call us) are stuck here in the stone ages with e and pi and such full of (among other things) irrational numbers, happily counting away without having to name a new system before we've even figured out what the old one was based on.
Bonus question: Provide the equation describing a THUNDERBIRD.
[1] Not unlike the Dark Arts.[2]
[2] As related by Professor Severus Snape
[3.14] Those who find the metric system too sexy for its body[e]
[e] Not to be confused with metrosexuals
It could be worse. You could have as set of Whitworth as well.
I left England about a year before decimalisation.It will be weird if we dump metric money (uk) £ s d
£1 = 20 shillings
1 shilling = 12 pennies
Pennies being d
Then there's crowns, half crowns, tanners, 6d, thrupenny bit 3d
1d 1/2d farthing 1/4d
Working in tens, decimal, currency is sure easier,
It will be weird if we dump metric money (uk) £ s d
£1 = 20 shillings
1 shilling = 12 pennies
Pennies being d
Then there's crowns, half crowns, tanners, 6d, thrupenny bit 3d
1d 1/2d farthing 1/4d
Working in tens, decimal, currency is sure easier,
hmmm...there is only one meter as opposed to numerous types of foot (at one time)..
e and pi are transcendental numbers...their only 'irrationality' stemming from the fact that they are tied in to a base 10 numbering system.....in retrospect, we would have been further ahead if instead of basing our numbering system on 10 (the number of fingers we have) we would have based it on 2 (the number of hands we have)....but of course that would have been way too cumbersome at the time..
And did it on slide rules...gotta keep in mind the meter is based on a real quantity where the foot is not..that said, my father’s generation of engineers dealt with wavelength in imperial units...pretty crazy..
It could be worse. You could have as set of Whitworth as well.