• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Thunderbird Club

is the ohsc for the Embassy similar to the 60’s Gibson type? always wondered...
Yes it is Chuck, but mine has lasted very well. Maybe from little use, or it might be made a little better. I actually think a little of both. This is the only case I've seen from the early 60s that isn't useless junk as far as carrying and protecting a bass. Every Thunderbird case is toast and useless as far as I'm concerned. Maybe it's just me, but the Epi case seems a little more sturdy. The inside color is better looking! (I have another case to carry the Embassy that's a little more snug.)
miIA6ZXesE1HQ68grRd5LZZt0zt8gP3DJjy4nY9q7B8TIjbe6jcTSBITJSeeZH7ZWU_gUah=w998-h1330-no?authuser=0.jpg
 
Yes it is Chuck, but mine has lasted very well. Maybe from little use, or it might be made a little better. I actually think a little of both. This is the only case I've seen from the early 60s that isn't useless junk as far as carrying and protecting a bass. Every Thunderbird case is toast and useless as far as I'm concerned. Maybe it's just me, but the Epi case seems a little more sturdy. The inside color is better looking! (I have another case to carry the Embassy that's a little more snug.)
View attachment 4268285
:drool:
 
Rexx - love your videos man!
Would be interested to know what your signal chain was on that recording. Any mixing in garage band or something similar to get the bass balance right and what you're using to shoot the video (go pro, iPhone, laptop...).
Again, great post, keep em coming! :thumbsup:

Hey G. Thanks, man.

I record directly into a Lexicon Alpha interface, for the mix I use Audacity (https://www.audacityteam.org/) and I don't do any post-processing/post EQ, meaning that what you hear in my videos is what comes out of my pedals and my bass. I just take the songs I cover and ''kill'' everything under the 250/300 Hz specter (that way my bass has more presence in the final mix and doesn't get messed/mixed up with the original bass of the songs). I tend to take the volume down on the song track (from -3 to -6db more or less) and usually leave the volume on my tracks untouched. Once I get the spot where everything sounds ok, I mix the tracks and export the file.

In this particular case, I connected my bass into a Darkglass Microtubes X Ultra with its cab sim on, that's all.

For the video recording, I use a regular Android smartphone and for the video editing I use VSDC Video Free Editor (http://www.videosoftdev.com/).

Lastly, I mix the music and the video tracks on the VSDC.

Hope it helps and thanks again for the nice words! :thumbsup:
 
The CP is “darker” or more like a modern Gibson bird. Lots of low end, decent upper mids. The VP (rebranded as 60s) has s bit less low end, but all the upper mids and highs (for a bass) anyone is likely to want.
My CP does things like early Allman Brothers, Grateful Dead, Grand Funk, and Motown with ease. But if you want something more like the Who or Yes, you definitely want the VP.
They’re both excellent basses.
this post really made my mind to go for the CP. There's still a few NOS CP on my local guitar store
 
Thunderbucker Pickup Issue:

Fellow Club members:

In 2015, I bought this bass (verbatim from the original TB ad):

“2013 Gibson non reverse thunderbird limited edition in Pelham blue, original case, customized:
1. Small ear hipshot ultralites full chrome
2. Dunlop strap lock pins
3. Babicz chrome bridge
4. Perfect pro shielding
5. Thunderbucker ranch pickups in chrome with framed, reversed engineering of 1976 pickups

The mods are all professional done”

The instrument plays well and I love the tone of the pickups.

BUT even though the PUs are ostensibly humbuckers, they’ve always hummed like single coils. Bridge, neck or both – hum! Rotate the instrument the right way, and the hum disappears, just like a Jazz Bass. All rooms (though some are worse than others).

My experienced luthier/tech -- he used to work for guitarist Ronnie Montrose -- said the ground and other connections were likely at fault, and I said, "OK, have at it."

He did his thing, but Nope, still hums.

Since I play in a pretty loud rock band, this usually isn't an issue, but still, I'd like to resolve it!

Does anyone have an idea of what is going on, and what to do to correct the issue?
Thanks,

-Joe in San Diego
 
One of these is a Thunderbird in disguise...
View attachment 4267719
This picture always confuses me. Is the VP really that much bigger than the (what I assume to be) your 64, or is this due to camera angle or something. The neck on the VP is longer for sure, due to the bridge placement, but even the body looks bigger?
 
Last edited:
Looks like you've locked in on one of the best bass designs on the planet - the Thunderbird.
That said, if you want to spend your money wisely in that arena there are three excellent choices. Any of the three are great and will serve you well. Probably the best logic to use is to buy the the one you can best afford.

The choices I'd recommend in order of best deal first...

1) a used Greco thunderbird for $1000 or less. Depending on where you live these can be easy or hard to come across. So look before you buy something else but don't wait long if you don't find one or you might miss out on better deals in the used TBird VP market. These are absolute monsters! They'll bury just about any other bass out there, massive volume levels, massive aggression and all the grit and grind you'd ever want.

2) a used TBird VP for $700 or less. If you can find one that comes with a case at that price jump on it, it's a hard deal to beat. These are a bit more agressive sounding than a CP and are capable of dialing in some very nice grit and grind.

3) a used CP TBird for $500 or less. Still an excellent sounding and built bird. It will sound much like its more expensive big brother Gibson Thunderbird, which is to say, excellent. A bit darker and smoother sounding than a VP

Note : if you have to buy new, your only choice of the bunch is the VP.
All excellent choices.

4) I would add a used Orville to that. Probably around 800-1000,-.
I used to own a modern Gibson, it had a nice smooth, sound, as you say above. My Orville sounds, in my opinion, more agressive, maybe like you describe the VP to sound? Anyway, I like the Orville sound.
 
Last edited:
I'm considering getting an Embassy to be able to semi-retire the 67 NR from playing out. I'll definitely get the OHSC too.
When I got a chance to play a new Embassy, some felt and sound better than others. So play around;) before you buy if you can. Of course Sweetwater would be more likely to not send a bad one if you get one from them. I like my Embassy, but will say Thunderbirds are more comfortable. I'm not crazy about the big rounded body with no beveling for your forearm. It's not bad, I'm just sensitive I guess. The newer Epi's are supposed to balance much better, but I've never had a strap on one. Mine is a first class gold medal Olympic diver, so a good strap is necessary.
 
Last edited:
this post really made my mind to go for the CP. There's still a few NOS CP on my local guitar store
That will be a good choice, but I have to say that neither of my VPs sound like the Who or Yes. I don't like the angry piano sound for my uses but go for big, thick and massive sounding with some punch and the VP does that as well. Not that Miles was implying the VP was only good for those brighter tones. He was just highlighting/contrasting what it does better than the CP. (I think I'm pretty close to being accurate on his take.) Not trying to talk you out of a CP, which is a really nice bass from all accounts, just didn't what you to think the VP only excelled in being bright sounding. When you get the CP, you have to post pics! We send "our people" out after those who don't!:D
 
This picture always confuses me. Is the VP really that much bigger than the (what I assume to be) your 64, or is this due to camera angle or something. The neck on the VP is longer for sure, due to the bridge placement, but even the body looks bigger?
It is a bigger bass. Certainly longer, neck slightly larger, bigger headstock and the body is a little thicker and slightly bigger in some ways if I recall correctly. I'd have to measure again to be sure on the body. The '64 is thinner for sure, and lighter.

Another take.
lS8tKxOp0-GcCRjbBDVjbZoLEqaAqzR3S2Y6WwF_qMvT05ZyXkb1J_vNVR2GtvhjTeT0OfQ=w998-h1330-no?authuser=0.jpg


Z3mVdCAHV4RwOHYC2pRWf68VH__7NgC5CDhgDnfqkFCTH-hBr3ILk8SsPNvvaPQjJ1x2sSg=w998-h1330-no?authuser=0.jpg
 
Last edited:
That will be a good choice, but I have to say that neither of my VPs sound like the Who or Yes. I don't like the angry piano sound for my uses but go for big, thick and massive sounding with some punch and the VP does that as well. Not that Miles was implying the VP was only good for those brighter tones. He was just highlighting/contrasting what it does better than the CP. (I think I'm pretty close to being accurate on his take.) Not trying to talk you out of a CP, which is a really nice bass from all accounts, just didn't what you to think the VP only excelled in being bright sounding. When you get the CP, you have to post pics! We send "our people" out after those who don't!:D
will do, but I think I'm going to try both first. I need to wait the NOS CP cause it's on their warehouse. Ah, I remember almost got the active one but don't like the sound. So, more variable now