Did a little bit of ‘testing’ with all four of my bird or bird like basses. I’ve been thinking one of em may have to go, but I’m not sure yet.
View attachment 4331834
First ‘issue’ is that through my current rig (TT800/Berg HDN212) the deep lows are sometimes a tad shy for my tastes. So is it the amp or the cab? I hooked up my Mesa M9 and TT800 to the Berg. Set ‘flat’ on both amps, they both sound like Mesa’s, but the M9 has so much low end on tap it’s silly. The cab handled it just fine. The TT800 sounds fantastic, but taking the bass control much past 2 o’clock there’s no noticeable bass increase...it’s just gets muddier. I’ve often said if the M9 was more reliable, I wouldn’t use anything else. The difference in headroom is also comical. No contest. I’m tempted to try inserting an eq into the TT800 fx loop to see if that does the trick to get a bit more low end cushion. I’d love to make the TT work because the two channel thing is so useful to me.
As to which bass may have to go, all I can say is it won’t be the Gibson. I think it’s the best overall of the bunch. It’s all pros and no cons for me.
Cataldo Pros- looks awesome, sounds amazing. The ThunderBucker Ranch ‘66 is a bit wilder than the Lollars in my Gibson, but not VP aggressive. Sits in a recording like a dream for rock and roll stuff.
Cataldo Cons- I prefer reverse bodies for playability by a small margin. I just don’t get on with 1.75” nut width these days. Hopefully the 1.5” neck Carlo sent me will do the trick, but I gotta get off my butt and swap the neck.
Greco Pros- has a nastier sound like the VP’s with a little more cool factor than the VP. I just don’t like the super thick Poly finishes on the VP’s. I don’t like the look and I don’t like the feel of the poly on my left hand or right forearm. The neck shape is a bit nicer on the Greco to me as well.
Greco Cons- it’s the heaviest of those 4 basses by a very noticeable amount. Swapping the bridge and tuners could make a big difference and I do have replacements sitting around. We’ll see.
Biggest con is it neck dives like a mofo. If I can’t cure that in a satisfactory way, it may have to move along. I’d prefer to make it work if at all possible. Nocturnal had an interesting solution, but I’d have to go back and find it.
Fano JM4 Pros- lightest of the 4 by a lot. Incredibly well balanced and playable. I quite like the looks too, but it plays like a dream and it’s somewhat unique.
Fano Cons- the Dennis Fano TBird style pickups are like a thicker, punchier J sound. That could be awesome sometimes, and not other times for me. It’s not as thumpy as Lollars, not as aggressive as the Greco or as rock and roll as the TB in the Cataldo. I have an extra Lollar laying around and am tempted to swap out the neck pickup with that. Could be just the ticket...?
Lots of pros and cons to think about in that post. If I had your problem I’d definitely switch necks on the Cataldo, that should make it a keeper, and the Gibby is already a keeper as is.
What’s left is a VP with a poly finish that you’re not keen on, a Fano that feels perfect but lacks a bit in sound, and a Greco that excels in sound but lacks in balance. With that in mind, I’d sell the VP (you’ll probably get what you paid for it or better). Then I’d do a Greco/Fano pup and control swap so that you have those “magic” Greco pups in that “incredibly well balanced and playable” Fano and the Fano pups in the Greco. Then I’d sell the Greco (with full disclosure that it has Fano pups).
That gets you down to a perfect all stock Gibby, a perfect all stock Cataldo, and a modded Fano with Greco guts that’ll eat a P bass for breakfast. That right there is a heck of a line up and puts about $1500 back in your pocket to either bring the M9 reliability up to snuff or to bolster the TT bottom end.
You must be pretty proud of your sons!