• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Thunderbird vs Rickenbacker again..

If you want a T-bird(ish) tone but an easier transition from a Fender there's also the Epiphone Embassy. Same pickups as the Epi Vintage Pro/60s T-bird (which I personally think are FAR better sounding pickups than the Gibson USA T-bird pickups).
 
Are you looking for something that sounds different? Looks different? You have a few routes. I bought a used TBird once and it didn't make it through a rehearsal before switching. I have had several Rics, using them exclusively for a short while before folding Fenders back in. I like the Ric a lot better obviously.

If you like the Tbird sound, you can look at Mike Lull or Bluesman Vintage for their hybrid basses. Fender style with Tbird pups. Want the looks….dunno, don't have the experience. But again BMV does the Super Bird, Dingwall, the new NR Tbird is nice from what I tried.

IMO instead of a Tbird, I'd look for a 2013-2014 EB from Gibson. Different look, different sound but very Fender in the feel.
 
This is something you need to tried both, and you need have specfic models of both, there's a lot of models and years of thunderbirds and same with Rickbenbackers. Are you going for a tone chase? Trying to be like Squire, Cliff, McCartney, Lemmy etc. ? Are you just getting it for looks and to dial your own tone? You have to weight those pros and cons, personally for me I would go with a Rickenbacker, there's also cheaper thunderbirds out there if you just want the looks. Just my 2 pennies. GL
 
  • Like
Reactions: rocknrolo
The Gibson Thunderbird that I owned did not have neck dive. The neck tapers like a Jazz neck and is fragile right around the headstock. It sounded like a Precision bass and I mostly played it because of how it looked. I modified mine by adding thunderbuckers. It was overall a well made bass and I sold it for a good price.

32B8763C-0ABD-4125-8510-0D990CDB8E65.jpeg

I had a Rick 4003 that I ended up selling as well. I loved the neck but the body was large and thin with sharp edges and took some getting used to. To me, the tone was squishy and tough to dial in. I liked it though. The neck is thick and doesn't taper. It is very different from a Precision bass. I got a good price for it and want to get another one someday.

46F688FE-9250-4187-90D6-E914E1B3131A.jpeg
 
Last edited:
This is something you need to tried both, and you need have specfic models of both, there's a lot of models and years of thunderbirds and same with Rickbenbackers. Are you going for a tone chase? Trying to be like Squire, Cliff, McCartney, Lemmy etc. ? Are you just getting it for looks and to dial your own tone? You have to weight those pros and cons, personally for me I would go with a Rickenbacker, there's also cheaper thunderbirds out there if you just want the looks. Just my 2 pennies. GL
I really like the look and sound of both.
 
  • Like
Reactions: salmon256
Torn between a Thunderbird or a Rick. I have primarily Fender bass player and ready to try a new flavor. Been leaving heavy on a thunderbird.. I play a lot of pop rock and jam band style music.
Talk me into either and thank you in advance...
(Disclaimer I will probably get both someday, just wanting to hear feedback on people's experiences)

I've had both an Epiphone Vintage Pro and a Ric and loved them both. I'd go for the epiphone first, and get the ric later.

Good Luck!
 
  • Like
Reactions: rocknrolo
Torn between a Thunderbird or a Rick. I have primarily Fender bass player and ready to try a new flavor. Been leaving heavy on a thunderbird.. I play a lot of pop rock and jam band style music.
Talk me into either and thank you in advance...
(Disclaimer I will probably get both someday, just wanting to hear feedback on people's experiences)
Both!
72F410AA-2477-4CCF-ADE8-EEBF7F979874.jpeg
 
Torn between a Thunderbird or a Rick. I have primarily Fender bass player and ready to try a new flavor. Been leaving heavy on a thunderbird.. I play a lot of pop rock and jam band style music.
Talk me into either and thank you in advance...
(Disclaimer I will probably get both someday, just wanting to hear feedback on people's experiences)

I like both.

I will say i prefer the new non-reverse. Hangs much bettet on the strap. The TB has the strap button on the heel of the neck. Cause the bass to flop over if you will. Have ti hold it more than other basses. Thr non reverse strap button is on the top horn, so does not have this issue. Plus I think the non reverse sounds better.

But prefer my 4003s to either....though its close. That non reverse is sweet
 
  • Like
Reactions: rocknrolo