TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Of course. If I don't like the sound I'm getting, what's the point?
When a 'real' band comes through, one who has obviously put a lot of effort into sounding great...they pull more people...and get more ass.

Funny how you think Status and Bergantino are cheap...and I own them. So that's your opinion out the window.
Tone is important but not as important as good playing. Because I am a good player I don't need to buy uber expensive gear like you do to sound good. I could buy expensive gear but what's the point when I still sound like me? I love my set-up ATM and I don't need to buy any more gear to sound better - I have found a tone, I am very happy with it and stuck with it. You on the other hand are probably still searching for it.
Tone is in the hands! Less eBay more Mel Bay! Taste great, less filling!

An instrument is a tool to create music, not a lifelong friend or mortgageloan investment.
I can think of several, including:
- Entertaining the audience
- Creating groovy music with your bandmates
- Earning money
All of these factors are more important to me than wonderful tone.
Evenin' all,
I have been thinking lately about something, which is kinda like this thread: http://www.talkbass.com/forum/showthread.php?t=456475&
A lot of people here and elsewhere in the music scene are completely obsessed with that elusive quality that is "tone". However, does tone really matter? I am talking about performing and live shows, not studio and recording of course, where tone would indeed be a big factor.
See, I'm in a place in my musical career where I have never recorded in a studio and it's not in my immediate future. Also, I have no money. That counts. Anyhoo, my gear is cryworthy: I own a Yamaha "cheapass bass" I think the term is, and I do not have my own amp. It sounds like... I don't know. When I play it, I'm not missing anything in my sound or whatever. It's not great, but good enough, know what I mean?
But in spite of that, I've done quite a few shows as a guitarist, and about 3 or 4 since I became a bassist, all with crappy gear, and all with complete conviction and energy. I think what people take away from a gig is the energy, the atmosphere and the fun they had, not what tone the bass or the guitar has, especially non musicians. Doesn't it, when doing shows, all come down to that? The songs you've written, the message, the energy you're trying to get across to the audience?
Now, what I'm wondering, is if a more highend bass or even a midrange "workhorse" kinda bass, like a MIM jazz for example would really be so much better? I am comfortable playing my agathis body, held-together-by-ducttape-and-chewing-gum, even-hobos-make-fun-of-me, cheapass Yamaha. And if I can "make it" with this thing, well, that would be a thing of pure punkrock poetry methinks. Or am I missing out on something? Am I making this harder for me than it should be? Am I just dodging the "a more expensive bass is automatically better" pitfall, or am I being a poor naive sap who is denying himself the pleasure of playing a $3000,- custom made bass?
And that's another thing. I don't know how you highend bass people do it. If I had an Alembic or whatever, I would be afraid to play it or scratch it. With an $80,- beauty, I save myself the worry of "omg, hope nuttin' happens to my bass". An instrument is a tool to create music, not a lifelong friend or mortgageloan investment.
Any thoughts?
From my experience gigging, 99% of your audience won't be able to tell the difference between your J and your P, your zingy/trebly active bass and your old school workhorse strung with flats, or between any other two pieces of equipment you switch between.