I kept reading many pages on this site about the practice of boiling your bass strings to prolong their life.
I read strange things about it and I'd like to take some of those claims out here for scientifically-minded scrutiny.
Here are some of the things people here believe:
1) When you boil strings, you do get fresh new-strings sound, but this goes away in a matter of days, and the strings will sound as dead as they were before you boiled them.
What kind of superstition is this? If boiling the strings you remove all the dirt and skin oils and give it a fresh brand-new-string sound, then why would that sound last any less than it would if they were indeed brand new? If all the unwanted dirt is cleaned and the strings aren't rusty, aren't they essentially brand new?
2) Boiling should only be done one or two times. After that, it will be so ineffective it won't be worth it.
What is it that you're taking away from the string and its quality by boiling that it gradually degrades its usefulness?
3) Boiling weakens strings and they will break easily.
Is steel that fragile for boiling water to affect its strength in 5 minutes?
4) Boiling should be considered a desperate measure when you're out of cash. It's not a professional thing to do. You should get a proper set of new strings if you want to get really great sound.
For this to be correct, there must be a real disadvantage about this whole practice of boiling strings. There must be at least one negative impact which the process of boiling has on the strings, because the proof that it does indeed bring back the new-strings sound is abundant.
Any comments?
I read strange things about it and I'd like to take some of those claims out here for scientifically-minded scrutiny.
Here are some of the things people here believe:
1) When you boil strings, you do get fresh new-strings sound, but this goes away in a matter of days, and the strings will sound as dead as they were before you boiled them.
What kind of superstition is this? If boiling the strings you remove all the dirt and skin oils and give it a fresh brand-new-string sound, then why would that sound last any less than it would if they were indeed brand new? If all the unwanted dirt is cleaned and the strings aren't rusty, aren't they essentially brand new?
2) Boiling should only be done one or two times. After that, it will be so ineffective it won't be worth it.
What is it that you're taking away from the string and its quality by boiling that it gradually degrades its usefulness?
3) Boiling weakens strings and they will break easily.
Is steel that fragile for boiling water to affect its strength in 5 minutes?
4) Boiling should be considered a desperate measure when you're out of cash. It's not a professional thing to do. You should get a proper set of new strings if you want to get really great sound.
For this to be correct, there must be a real disadvantage about this whole practice of boiling strings. There must be at least one negative impact which the process of boiling has on the strings, because the proof that it does indeed bring back the new-strings sound is abundant.
Any comments?