She has also done some cool recordings with Buddy Guy and BB King. She knows how to work a vocal line.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
I'm going to guess you mean "Give me one Reason" but the OP is referring to her debut from 1987. She had another hit off that record with "Fast Car". I just looked these albums up and, surprisingly, her debut outsold the New Beginning (the one with "give me one reason") at a 4:1 ratio.
My friend lived in Mongolia for a year in the mid-2000s. He came back home blasting "give me one reason" like it was 1995 again. When I asked him why he found such a love for the song he informed me that every cover band in Mongolia did this song as part of their set. He also mentioned that it was always men who sang the song and they tended to nail it.
Seriously, that must be when he did "the bride" movie...It takes a strong artist to stand up to the magnificence of Sting's golden mane.
Good enough has nothing to do with it... A better word is marketable first, music second...I would be surprised if anyone today is intentionally held back. Chances to make a splash are so fleeting. If someone is good enough to gain any interest, you have to go for it.
Been hearing that since the beginning of timeGood enough has nothing to do with it... A better word is marketable first, music second...
Been hearing that since the beginning of timeI don't think I believe it. We may not like certain songs or certain acts, but if people are buying it, it appeals to someone. And I've seen a whole lot of acts who had their look and marketing totally together, had all the right connections, had plenty of money behind them, and still their music stiffed. Paris Hilton and Brooke Hogan immediately come to mind, but there are others we never heard of who didn't fail in such a spectacular fashion. Meanwhile a little red-headed nerd with an acoustic guitar who isn't particularly handsome and didn't have any money is currently the world's top singer/songwriter. Truth is, it's a lot easier to do a song that nobody likes than it is to write one that a million people like. Talent has to be a major part of the equation, at least that's the way I see it.
Been hearing that since the beginning of timeI don't think I believe it. We may not like certain songs or certain acts, but if people are buying it, it appeals to someone. And I've seen a whole lot of acts who had their look and marketing totally together, had all the right connections, had plenty of money behind them, and still their music stiffed. Paris Hilton and Brooke Hogan immediately come to mind, but there are others we never heard of who didn't fail in such a spectacular fashion. Meanwhile a little red-headed nerd with an acoustic guitar who isn't particularly handsome and didn't have any money is currently the world's top singer/songwriter. Truth is, it's a lot easier to do a song that nobody likes than it is to write one that a million people like. Talent has to be a major part of the equation, at least that's the way I see it.
Thanks man...now I've got "You Don't Want Me Anymore" going through my brain and it won't go awayI agree. Ultimately, talent wins out. Talent can mean many things of course. Being a killer song writer, being a superior musician or maybe just have the knack for writing a hook that stands the test of time. Locally when I was gigging big time and heavily involved in the local music scene two bands were coming up and you could tell that one of them were going places. The other had big money to spend, great marketing and a minor hit. The other had a bunch of dudes who were reckless and focused. The first mentioned band was Steel Breeze. The second was City Kid, that became Tesla. All of daddies money couldn't by Steel Breeze success.
Talent has to be a major part of the equation, at least that's the way I see it.
That much is true, too. But people have to WANT to nurture or display you properly, and of course you have to be willing to do your part and then some as well. Some acts turn people off by their bad personalities or being too demanding at a level that isn't commensurate with their talent or success. Some aren't willing to work hard enough. And again, some (most) people just don't have what it takes in the talent department and can't compensate in other ways. IMHO there's way more to it than evil record execs holding someone back, although there are some very evil record execs throughout history, indeed.A part of it yes... A major part. I'm not sure... Talent, when not nurtured or displayed properly has a hard time standing out... IMO..
I'm going to guess you mean "Give me one Reason" but the OP is referring to her debut from 1987. She had another hit off that record with "Fast Car". I just looked these albums up and, surprisingly, her debut outsold the New Beginning (the one with "give me one reason") at a 4:1 ratio.
My friend lived in Mongolia for a year in the mid-2000s. He came back home blasting "give me one reason" like it was 1995 again. When I asked him why he found such a love for the song he informed me that every cover band in Mongolia did this song as part of their set. He also mentioned that it was always men who sang the song and they tended to nail it.
hello tbers
I was listening to Tracy Chapman's self titled debut album just recently and remembered how much I enjoyed it upon its release. And it was a major selling album back when I was working in the record store.
Looking her up, I was surprised to find that some sources say she was held back and groomed for a big debut by her management. Some say she spent almost 6 years in development.
I wonder if there are still artists who have the luxury of 6 years developing their brand before releasing the debut?
Katy Perry comes to mind - she seemed to bust out of nowhere with a decent bunch of pop hits. Perhaps Gaga as well?