Sidebar: weren't the original all maple Grabbers really heavy?It's got to be a straight head Grabber.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Sidebar: weren't the original all maple Grabbers really heavy?It's got to be a straight head Grabber.
Yeah, I just can't get behind having someone else's name on my instruments. I'll make an exception for Jack Casady for unstated reasons, but otherwise signature-type basses usually have something about them that turns me off. I'm also too old to be much of a fan of Kiss, so there's that. And it really is waaaay too much money.
I selected "carrots" as it is not really growing on me (esp at that price point), but I don't hate it or anything. I do wonder if that logo on the pickguard means a V bass is coming down the line.
Has Gene ever played a Thunderbird? If so, it can't have been much.
I’m not complaining about the price, I’m complaining about the value. The two basses you mentioned have reasonably good ergonomics, play well and sound good. For roughly the same price, T-bird might play Ok, but ergonomics & sound are weak points. Gene really has nothing to do with any of that. I don’t particular like to hate Gibson, but they are who make it easy to do in most cases. I had a great sounding & great playing 1984 Gibson Explorer I foolishly traded off. It’s ergonomics weren’t great, but somewhat better than a bird. In the end, modern Gibson basses haven’t been very popular or very competitive at their price points & they don’t make the models that were popular in the past. If they did, their prices might prevent them being popular again…..Everyone complaining about the price. A brand new Stingray is $2400-2500. Ric $2500. Etc…
This is right in that price range for a USA sig series. People just like to hate Gibson and Gene makes that easier.
Ergonomics are debatable and subjective. Some people find them very easy to play, there is a whole club of them here. Sound is also subjective, lots of people think thunderbirds sound fantastic in a rock setting. I understand the point you are making, but why argue what is a value in an item that is wholly dependent on the buyers likes and needs. People are paying $600 for squiers these days. Gibson is selling these to Kiss fans, not someone looking for the best value for the dollar.I’m not complaining about the price, I’m complaining about the value. The two basses you mentioned have reasonably good ergonomics, play well and sound good. For roughly the same price, T-bird might play Ok, but ergonomics & sound are weak points. Gene really has nothing to do with any of that. I don’t particular like to hate Gibson, but they are who make it easy to do in most cases. I had a great sounding & great playing 1984 Gibson Explorer I foolishly traded off. It’s ergonomics weren’t great, but somewhat better than a bird. In the end, modern Gibson basses haven’t been very popular or very competitive at their price points & they don’t make the models that were popular in the past. If they did, their prices might prevent them being popular again…..
Looks great, but it’s a T-Bird. I own a ‘92 model ‘bird. It’s a neck diving boat anchor that doesn’t sound great, but I only have about $600 in it. If this one actually requires $2700 to buy, ($2700 is just MSRP, but can be bought much cheaper), it wouldn’t even be on a long list of basses I would be considering. And as mentioned, Gene doesn’t play a T-bird and hasn’t in the past that I know of. Seems Gibson is remaining true to their history of making very overpriced basses that don’t sound like anything special, have mediocre ergonomics, and are heavy. I don’t see a line forming for these….
Looks subdued enough I might consider buying it.
Watch Trogly's video to just before he starts playing it. Time mark 15:47If my arms were 10 inches longer, I'd buy one. I know that the headstock will instantly dive to horizontal or lower.
4 strings, motion activated, and shaped like a......wait for it....a VWhat are the hints saying about the possible specs?

Sidebar: weren't the original all maple Grabbers really heavy?
Here is a better sound demo. Watch it all the way through. I think it sounds great.It looks great (minus that gene logo) and I'm surprised it's balanced, but those pick-ups are way too muddy for rock to my ears. I'm not really a Kiss connoisseur, but I feel like this G2 bass sounds muddier than what Gene normally plays. Kind of a head-scratcher, since he upgraded all the hardware, why not change the pick-ups?
Mine is Alder and weighs 8 pounds and 1 ounce.
I want one!