I don't have a citation for you, except to recall mainstream digital signal transmission theory. The big difference between analog and digital signal transmission is a feature called "noise immunity."
With analog transmission, small amounts of noise, or small amounts of loss, are directly converted into proportionate amounts of noise or loss in the final reconstruction of the input signal (e.g., the sound coming out of a speaker). You hope that the noise and loss remain below a reasonable threshold of audibility (or visibility for video, I suppose).
With digital transmission, noise and loss have no effect on the reconstructed analog signal until they cross a threshold. In a well designed system, the signal is transmitted with considerable headroom above the threshold. This is why digital transmission can be noiseless and lossless.
Transmission standards such as HDMI and Cat-5 impose requirements on the properties of the cable, which can be compromised if the cable is damaged.
It's a bit more complicated for some forms of extremely high density storage or high bandwidth comms, where some level of errors are tolerated, so long as they are correctable at the receiving end. For systems that need absolute 100% error free recovery, such as a USB hard disk drive, a combination of lossless transmission and error correction -- perhaps even with redundancy -- is employed.
(Posted by an old-timer)