I recently acquired an Acoustic Image Contra II with Ext Cab here on talkbass (thanks Chris!), and absolutely love it. The problem I'm having seems to be coming from my pickup. I'm currently playing through a Revolution Solo I sans pre-amp, and want to add another pickup and preamp, but I'm not exactly sure which setup would give me the most flexibility. The bottom end from my Rev is great, gets a good growl, but the upper range is just too tinny for my taste, and I want a more full sound. If anyone could point me in the right direction as far as preamps and two pickups are concerned, I'd be one happy camper.
Enjoy the benefits of a premium membership!
Upgrade Account
-
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Double Bass Two Pickups?
- Thread starter ChopsMcGee
- Start date
ChopsMcGee said:
Operating two pickups in tandem is a "phase" crapshoot. Perhaps it would be more efficient to address why your RS-I sounds tinny. There is a chance the problem could be alleviated by the pre-amp. The RS-I is not picky about imput impedance and the AI is plenty high. The RS-II is even less picky. My recommendation would be to find the single pickup that works for you. I've always gotten really fine results from the RS pickups but basses and details of pickup-fitting do vary.
Right now I'm using a DTAR Solstice to blend both an Rev. Solo and a Dyn-B. I'm very happy with the sound I'm getting. It's not "
"realistically" accurate, but in some ways it sounds better than my acoustic sound. Loud, bassy, lots of definition, lots of growl, attack, and very natural. There's still some subtle factors, such as environment, cab location, controls/knows, feedback control that I'm still exploring but pretty much I'm done looking.
The combined sound is better than any single pickup I've ever used. I tried an ATM35 and this kills the it too.
"realistically" accurate, but in some ways it sounds better than my acoustic sound. Loud, bassy, lots of definition, lots of growl, attack, and very natural. There's still some subtle factors, such as environment, cab location, controls/knows, feedback control that I'm still exploring but pretty much I'm done looking.
The combined sound is better than any single pickup I've ever used. I tried an ATM35 and this kills the it too.
I have found the Rev to be very weak on the G string, almost to the point of not cutting through at all. You could look at adding a mic to the mix, a Shure sm58 wrapped in a towell and stuck in the tailpeice is a cheap route to go. with a preamp/blender you could blend the mic and Rev quite nicely and get a better balence. Just another alternative.
I've been using two pick-ups with my Coda and it works great. I run an Underwood throught the pre-amp, and add a Schertler Stat-B with it's own little pre-amp into the effects return on the same strip.
The Stat-B provides a very stout fundamental and bottom-end, while the Underwood is great for the upper mids. I send the DI to the PA board, and use the Coda mostly for stage sound.
The Stat-B provides a very stout fundamental and bottom-end, while the Underwood is great for the upper mids. I send the DI to the PA board, and use the Coda mostly for stage sound.
Stat-B and an Underwood? Cool. I get highs/lows with the RS, and mids from the Dyn-B. THe Dyn-B is the "seasoning" i add to the sound to make it good. 
What about adding a mic? I use a k&k right between the bridge feel. AMT is great too though considerably more expensive. Either will add 'air' and complexity to your sound.
