i know, i it hadnt even occured to me until just now 
i havnt even put the 750 on the 112s yet, i must be going mad!!!
Dave
i havnt even put the 750 on the 112s yet, i must be going mad!!!
Dave
Enjoy the benefits of a premium membership!
Upgrade Account
-
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
UL310 + UL310 stacked
- Thread starter dominic54321
- Start date
fretless Bob said:i know, i it hadnt even occured to me until just now
i havnt even put the 750 on the 112s yet, i must be going mad!!!
Dave
You have a lot going on, mentally
what with your studies and not to mention or put any stress on ya 
your up coming audition. 
yeah dont remind me, that might be why im having tendancies to duplicate posts 
anyway, enough de-railing of this thread, i wanna see some pics of 2 UL310s stacked now DAMN IT!!!!
Dave
anyway, enough de-railing of this thread, i wanna see some pics of 2 UL310s stacked now DAMN IT!!!!
Dave
fretless Bob said:enough de-railing of this thread, i wanna see some pics of 2 UL310s stacked now DAMN IT!!!!
Dave
Hell with the pics, I want the STACK!!
I finally have pics of my Epifani Ul310 stack! I won't be receiving my Crest CA9 til next week, so the Stewart 2.1 will do the job just fine for this weekend's gigs. The sound is killer! It's very sensitive to EQing..I can dial in almost any tone..from a old school tubey sound, to a very refined, punchy and hi-fi slap tone! This setup will be really useful for my top 40 cover band, which we go from funk, to rock, to motown, country, and back again! I tried three preamps...a SVP-PRO, Yamaha PB-1, and an Alembic F-1x. IMO..The Alembic matches up perfectly!
I finally have pics of my Epifani Ul310 stack! I won't be receiving my Crest CA9 til next week, so the Stewart 2.1 will do the job just fine for this weekend's gigs. The sound is killer! It's very sensitive to EQing..I can dial in almost any tone..from a old school tubey sound, to a very refined, punchy and hi-fi slap tone! This setup will be really useful for my top 40 cover band, which we go from funk, to rock, to motown, country, and back again! I tried three preamps...a SVP-PRO, Yamaha PB-1, and an Alembic F-1x. IMO..The Alembic matches up perfectly!
That is INSANE!
I finally have pics of my Epifani Ul310 stack! I won't be receiving my Crest CA9 til next week, so the Stewart 2.1 will do the job just fine for this weekend's gigs. The sound is killer! It's very sensitive to EQing..I can dial in almost any tone..from a old school tubey sound, to a very refined, punchy and hi-fi slap tone! This setup will be really useful for my top 40 cover band, which we go from funk, to rock, to motown, country, and back again! I tried three preamps...a SVP-PRO, Yamaha PB-1, and an Alembic F-1x. IMO..The Alembic matches up perfectly!
I hope your fish are allright
I finally have pics of my Epifani Ul310 stack! I won't be receiving my Crest CA9 til next week, so the Stewart 2.1 will do the job just fine for this weekend's gigs. The sound is killer! It's very sensitive to EQing..I can dial in almost any tone..from a old school tubey sound, to a very refined, punchy and hi-fi slap tone! This setup will be really useful for my top 40 cover band, which we go from funk, to rock, to motown, country, and back again! I tried three preamps...a SVP-PRO, Yamaha PB-1, and an Alembic F-1x. IMO..The Alembic matches up perfectly!
why the switch from the 2.1 to a ca9?
I finally have pics of my Epifani Ul310 stack! I won't be receiving my Crest CA9 til next week, so the Stewart 2.1 will do the job just fine for this weekend's gigs. The sound is killer! It's very sensitive to EQing..I can dial in almost any tone..from a old school tubey sound, to a very refined, punchy and hi-fi slap tone! This setup will be really useful for my top 40 cover band, which we go from funk, to rock, to motown, country, and back again! I tried three preamps...a SVP-PRO, Yamaha PB-1, and an Alembic F-1x. IMO..The Alembic matches up perfectly!
yikes!
I ran a friends CA9 through one of these cabs 2 weeks ago, and it sounded HUGE!!! There's ALOT of debate about the newer switching power amps(stewart 2.1) and the "lead sled" amps(ca9). I A/B'd the 2 amps(in my living room), and let my ears be the judge, and they picked the CA9 slightly over the 2.1. I still love my stewart 2.1, but the ca9, IMHO, has a quality that only few other amps can match. Notice, I said IMHO!!!
Besides, the CA9 can push out more watts per channel!!! When I get my own CA9(should be here next week), I'm gonna A/B the 2 amps at a gig with no PA support, and with a very loud guitar setup and drums.
- Apr 29, 2003
- 9,073
- 9,789
- Disclosures
- Contributor- Bass Musician Magazine | Marketing Manager- Trickfish Amplification
AFAIK, no contest between a 2.1 and a CA9. Its CA9 all day!!!!
Unless you have a back problem, then thats a different story
Unless you have a back problem, then thats a different story
Man, I knew I shouldn't've opened this thread. I'm happy with my UL112's, but, phew, I want that. I bet it sounds killer. Congrats on an amazing rig.
Quadzilla
Supporting Member
My version of a 2 x UL310 stack
Nice. Did you do this via a 4ohm410 and an 8 ohm 210? I always thought that would be a cool rig.... the impedance would result in basically each 10 getting the same amount of power, so you would have something close to a modular 610UL. Cool, as long as your amp can safely pump it out at 2.67 ohms. This would be the ultimate stack for my Glock HR, which puts out 1000 watts at 2.67 ohms!
The other advantage is that using each cab separately with the same SS head would result in the power output of the amp being optimized (more for the larger cab and less for the smaller cab).
Nice, regardless of the impedance
I've never run out of headroom with my 4ohm 410UL, but if I ever started played really loud, this would be a cool option!
Quadzilla
Supporting Member
Nah, both cabs are 4 ohm. I know that the 8 and 4 ohm cabs would be the better option for using them together, but honestly, I'll be using them individually 90+% of the time and having 4 ohm cabs make more sense for me there when I use my Thunderfunk. Two of my other heads will do 2 ohm loads, my Yamaha BBT500H and my Aguilar DB750. I could pair up the Yam with one of my amps (or even my Thunderfunk for that matter). I have a Stewart 1.2 and also a 2.1 so I guess having the 4 ohm cabs won't matter much if I take that approach...
The 210UL/TF is a really nice combination, and +1 to the 4ohm version for that matchup. The TF's mid voicing really works well with the 210UL's somewhat wide voicing (to my ear). Nice one-two punch there!!!
K
I finally have pics of my Epifani Ul310 stack! I won't be receiving my Crest CA9 til next week, so the Stewart 2.1 will do the job just fine for this weekend's gigs. The sound is killer! It's very sensitive to EQing..I can dial in almost any tone..from a old school tubey sound, to a very refined, punchy and hi-fi slap tone! This setup will be really useful for my top 40 cover band, which we go from funk, to rock, to motown, country, and back again! I tried three preamps...a SVP-PRO, Yamaha PB-1, and an Alembic F-1x. IMO..The Alembic matches up perfectly!
Any update on your system yet?
