Hey all, so I'm in negotiations with a local club for my 10-piece funk band to play in April. The gig is flat-rate, and the club is located in a busy section of Boston with a known 'built in' crowd for a Friday night. In negotiations with the booking guy, I am getting an unbelievable amount of waffling on signing a performance contract. With previous clubs, a signed contract has never been a big deal, but these guys are acting like I'm demanding they sign the Magna Carta. At the beginning of December, I finally got the booking guy to a point where he agreed to let me *send* him the contract (which I did, two copies with a self-addressed stamped envelope so all he had to do was sign it and mail it right back to me). All month, no response. Finally, almost six weeks later, I get this email back:
For the curious, here's the text of our standard contract:
Customer: Location: Date: Time: Band Obligations - Soulphonic (Here - Pastebin.com
Are the terms overly-aggressive, or am I setting myself up for Pain(tm) by continuing on with this gig?
Is the contract for Sat 4/7 at <venue> really necessary? I am holding off from signing it as we have never signed any contracts before and dont intend to start now. The only reason I dont want to sign it is because we cannot forsee any events that may happen which may cause the 4/7 gig to be cancelled, but I can assure you that we have never cancelled a gig on a band without plenty of advance notice. I dont want to get caught having to take responsibility for having to pay you guys if something were to happen close to that night.
If you can still agree on <fee> for <band> at <venue>, then consider it confirmed but I really cant sign this contract.
Please let me know what you think.
For the curious, here's the text of our standard contract:
Customer: Location: Date: Time: Band Obligations - Soulphonic (Here - Pastebin.com
Are the terms overly-aggressive, or am I setting myself up for Pain(tm) by continuing on with this gig?