TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
I can't believe it, even a Kay is (north) of two grand!
...hope soI think the appearance of the reissue models on the market has raised awareness of the originals and their perceived value. ...
I still have my Gino’s name-tag (circa 1979)... wonder if it’s vintage and/worth much?!?
(Gino’s was a fast food burger joint... where KFC began)
View attachment 2882767
I have been browsing the old Fender's in particular and the prices blow me away. Call me naive, call me ignorant but what makes an instrument that was made in the 60's and the 70's cost anything between $2.000 and more than $8.000? Where the electronics made by superior or advanced components? Were the trees from which the wood came any better than those of today? Did the procedure of building a quality instrument not improve? Or is it simply nostalgia of the teenage years that idolizes everything about that era?
I have been browsing the old Fender's in particular and the prices blow me away. Call me naive, call me ignorant but what makes an instrument that was made in the 60's and the 70's cost anything between $2.000 and more than $8.000? Where the electronics made by superior or advanced components? Were the trees from which the wood came any better than those of today? Did the procedure of building a quality instrument not improve? Or is it simply nostalgia of the teenage years that idolizes everything about that era?
worse basses ever made by Fender around 1970-1974 - wouldn't give any thing more than a few bucks above average retail for their time - which was around $200 or less - they are crap
worse basses ever made by Fender around 1970-1974 - wouldn't give any thing more than a few bucks above average retail for their time - which was around $200 or less - they are crap
So you got the 1Disagree
I have a few early 70's that are great but I did have to fish through a bunch to find them.
Late 70's - 90's basses are worst for me.
I have a 60' P; they had very few stinkers back then

Even in that era, though, there have to be individual basses that are good specimens.worse basses ever made by Fender around 1970-1974 - wouldn't give any thing more than a few bucks above average retail for their time - which was around $200 or less - they are crap
Yep it’s crazy. But you can also be satisfied that you can own any number of quality instruments produced today that out play any vintage instrument on any day.
Not sure exactly what your point is.
The main thing is a player needs to understand if they are a collector or not. Don’t get stuck in the middle. Be a collector or not. If you are a player and not a collector, then a) there are plenty of perfectly great non-collector pieces that get the job done; and b) you should let the instruments come to you.
Which in the latter aspect doesn’t mean you don’t keep your ear to the ground; just that you don’t push the issue. If you stumble across a nice instrument, then great.
Let the collectors be collectors. None of us can change that anyhow. Work hard on your playing and try to play the best instruments for your needs you find. That’s it.
Even in that era, though, there have to be individual basses that are good specimens.
worse basses ever made by Fender around 1970-1974 - wouldn't give any thing more than a few bucks above average retail for their time - which was around $200 or less - they are crap
At some point, musical instruments cease being tools and are transformed into pieces of art.
They say high prices are due to supply and demand.
Does that mean demand (and prices) will drop after the Baby Boomers who grew up in that Old Fender Era and were inspired to play music by those heroes of yesteryear ... die?
Look at the antique market. Did Louis XIV period items drop in value after 60 years?