• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Wal Bass Club.

I'm working on a build and I can't seem to find the most straight answer to where the pickups are actually positioned on a Wal Mk1. I need the distance from the 12th fret (the fret itself) to either the center of each pickup or to the edge. Someone on another thread mentioned it was 12" to the neck and 15" to the bridge, but did not say whether it was to the center of the pickup or the edge. By my deducing I think it's to the center, but can anyone confirm that for me or put the actual dimensions?

Edit - After another search this appears that it may be unubtanium type of information. I'll understand if no one answers. I am not creating a Wal clone if that helps, but I would like to get the placement at least in the ballpark.

@mikeswals answered this in this post - Wal Bass Club..

The pickle is, the measurements are not in a standard format that can be easily replicated - e.g. ‘from the centre of the 12th fret to the centre of the pickup’. They are in a format which can really only be replicated exactly if you own a Wal, and not much by anyone else.

I too am planning a build, in my case a Wal Mk2-alike, as I frankly cannot afford a Wal, and even if I could, I cannot manage a 4 year wait for one, which seems to be the lead time on the website. But I have not managed to yet find this information either, and may have to estimate it from photos.
 
That’s another reason why I am puzzled that a fretless (where an ebony fingerboard is standard) seems to bring a lesser resale, when ebony is an up charge on a fretted Wal. Also, the opposite is the case for Ibanez Musician basses where the fretless brings more $ on resale market. To me, the resale value is the same be it fretted or fretless, I gravitate more to my fretless mk1, but that’s me.
 
That’s another reason why I am puzzled that a fretless (where an ebony fingerboard is standard) seems to bring a lesser resale, when ebony is an up charge on a fretted Wal. Also, the opposite is the case for Ibanez Musician basses where the fretless brings more $ on resale market. To me, the resale value is the same be it fretted or fretless, I gravitate more to my fretless mk1, but that’s me.

That always puzzled me too. I guess Tool has a lot to do with it. And fretted basses are generally more popular than fretless. But for me a fretless Wal is the Wal sound.
 
That’s another reason why I am puzzled that a fretless (where an ebony fingerboard is standard) seems to bring a lesser resale, when ebony is an up charge on a fretted Wal. Also, the opposite is the case for Ibanez Musician basses where the fretless brings more $ on resale market. To me, the resale value is the same be it fretted or fretless, I gravitate more to my fretless mk1, but that’s me.

supply = demand... fretless players, especially ones willing to pony up north of $10K for a bass are few..