Hey guys, I just bought this guy here on TB. Could someone let me know which model it is, and also could I grab a number too. Thanks! I know it was made in 2010 but that is all. IMG_1010 | Flickr - Photo Sharing!
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Looks like a Dran Michael 5 bolt-on to me.Hey guys, I just bought this guy here on TB. Could someone let me know which model it is, and also could I grab a number too. Thanks! I know it was made in 2010 but that is all. IMG_1010 | Flickr - Photo Sharing!
![]()
IMHO, it makes the high end too brittle, and it takes some of the life out of the upper mids and low treble region especially. It just seems like the sound really opens up and becomes more generally full and clear overall without it. I would never tolerate it in any Warrior I would keep long term.Thanks, Vic! Also, what does the sparkle circuit do to your sound? I see alot of people hating on it but I haven't heard it yet. Can't wait to get her!

I believe it's actually called the "Sparkle" circuit, if I recall correctly, though he doesn't officially document it.So I had posted before my thoughts about some of the short falls in general of my two Warriors as far as imbalance in pickups output my not so good thoughts about the crystal circuit etc...
I understand your being anxious to just get the new preamp in, but your description of how the sound opened up and deepened for you was similar (at least to a degree, since I can't A/B yours to mine) to my experiences by simply removing that Sparkle circuit... it was like removing a "tone choke". It'd have been VERY interesting if you'd had a chance to try it with the Bart and no Sparkle, and then move to the East (though again, I understand just wanting to be done with it).I was contemplating the Pope Flexcore. Well instead I went with a John East U Retro Deluxe 01 with black furniture...
I see that there seem to be two different Bartolini Jazz pickups used on recent Warrior Basses...
I am familiar with the "X5" version
![]()
the other seems to be a "Vintage" jazz version
![]()
Can anyone comment on the differences in
tone
noise/hum
etc?
Careful... this is not correct. This has been discussed in this thread before. It depends on WHICH X5(5) you're talking about. See below from their web site... the CB models are offered in BOTH a true single coil as well as a split coil hum cancelling design (they call them in-line dual coils), and the non-CB is ONLY offered as a true single coil...The X5 is not a single coil. I think a lot of people confuse them for singles, because of the shape. They sound a lot like singles and have little to no hum.
The Bart 59's are true single coils, so you'll get some hum when either is solo'd. I have not had a Warrior with the 59's, but I've had plenty of Zon's that use them (or a very similar model) and they sound great.
Careful... this is not correct. This has been discussed in this thread before. It depends on WHICH X5(5) you're talking about. See below from their web site... the CB models are offered in BOTH a true single coil as well as a split coil hum cancelling design (they call them in-line dual coils), and the non-CB is ONLY offered as a true single coil...
- X55CBJS pair - X5 narrow Soapbar shape available in low noise neck (B) and bridge (T) single coils
- X55CBJD pair - available in neck (B) and bridge (T) in-line hum canceling dual coils
- X55J1-pair-single coil deep tone w/strong lows and low mids
Is it possible for a warrior to not have a serial number on the back of the headstock. If not, is there anywhere else that the Serial number could be? Just bought one, I really hope its not fake and i don't think it is....The picture of it is posted a few posts up.

lsu921 said:Not a real good day to take pictures, but it's really not a good day for anything. Yucky weather..
trujo777 said:Wow.. What are the specs on this monster? Amazing... Please adopt me![]()
Nice. What is the verdict on this one?