• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Double Bass weird Juzek (NYC guys)

Fred, if the Bass is a D-neck it is more likely German after wwII. If it is an Eb-neck, then I would say Czech, pre wwII. In either case it was made in the Schoenbach area that borders the two countries IF is was ever a Juzek "purchased" Bass at all. If you can Post pics of the Back Purfling design and the Bass itself, Scroll, etc, I could maybe identify it better. All of these Basses with that Design on the back that were Labelled by Juzek in "USA" were made by the Wilfer Family. Many Wilfers from both Emanuell and Wenzel (WBW) have come to USA in the past and recently as well. Juzek was one of their main customers from the beginning, buying all the Carved Basses from that family in ether country b4 and after wwII when the moved everything over to west Germany.
 
Apologies again for the photo quality.

Thanks again to Ed Fuqua for putting me on to this bass. And that was a great show on Saturday night. What bass playing! A great learning experience, and a humbling experience as well. Parenthetical note: I drank one too many glasses of cheap wine.
 
Nice bass

The tuners and the back of the scroll are exacly like my bass. The design looks very similar as well. Mine is labeled from Mittenwald Germany made around the turn of the century. My bass lacks the fancy purfling and has a more reddish finish. The wood is has less figure as well. Nice bass
Peace
Benton
 
Hey!

I'm posting because I love my bass so much and some interesting stuff has happened with it over the last six years.

Remember the neck joint repair Ed noted that looked like it was done with a dowel? Well, what looked like a dowel from the surface was actually a circular piece of wood covering a screw which had been used to secure a through-and-through crack in the heel of the neck. I found that out this summer.

Rewind to a couple years back, when I noticed the string height creeping up. It turned out that the crack in the heel had been opening up and the strings were pulling the scroll forward, causing the string height to rise. The more fundamental problem was that the neck was wobbly. The crack was repaired at that juncture with glue, but this Spring the crack started opening up again and more drastic measures were called for.

An unsual characteristic of my bass had been how low off the top of the bass the fingerboard was. The bridge was actually one of the shortest I've seen. (I don't have the measurement.) The short distance of the strings from the top contributed to the bass not being particularly loud and also made it seem not that big for a 3/4.

The felicitous thing about the crack in the neck heel was that the repair would allow for the opportunity to push the neck and fingerboard forward, which would make the bass louder, according to some theory of physics and luthiery that I don't understand.

Mike Weatherly presented me with my choices. I could replace the neck altogether or repair the existing neck by removing it, cutting away the cracked portion, and replacing the cracked portion with a new piece of maple. Either way the neck would be moved forward.

Replacing the neck would have been more expensive. When Mike had first put on the new fingerboard in 2005, he had to put a kind of shim under the G string side, since the string tension over the years had caused the neck to twist. But that wasn't really a cause for concern. What helped me decide was that while David's shop would have matched the color of the new scroll to my old one and to the body of the bass, the painted-on flame was something they would not replicate. (I could have had the old scroll grafted onto a new neck but that would have been prohibitively expensive.) So I asked Mike to fix the old neck.

When Mike removed the neck he discovered that the neck block in the bass was also cracked, and that people had been pouring glue in there apparently for decades.

Jumping ahead to the present, the pieces grafted into the heel of the neck look beautiful, almost decorative, and as a result of pushing the fingerboard forward the bass is noticeably louder and feels bigger in the best kind of way. The bass sounds great with any strings on it, but it seems to love Velvets. The low-tension E and A strings just cause it to vibrate and resonate like anything.

When David first saw the bass he figured it was from around 1935 but the appraisal says circa 1955. Either way I'm happy.
 
Here's the neck repair. The crack through the heel was contiguous with that crack in the rib. The flame on the ribs, back, and scroll is expertly painted on.
 

Attachments

  • bass button.JPG
    bass button.JPG
    30.5 KB · Views: 141
I have a smaller Juzek 3/4 flatback that was labelled 1915. Unfortunately at the time of crack repair of the back the lower half of the label was obliterated; luthier was not attentive enough to rescue it. I should've photo'ed it prior to repair. I still kick myself because provenance is put into question. All I can do is to "swear on a stack o' bibles" that the label said 1915. I understand labels have been known to be altered.
At any rate, I purchased this bass from a flea market "picker" here in western PA. It was a Pittsburgh Public Schools bass (number and all), with the most endearing aspect of it's outward appearance the "Johnny ____ + Karen ____ " scratched into the upper ribs with the date 1949. There was very little clearance from the fingerboard to the top, which has been currently remediated with a neck reset. Actually it could use a new neck but is well playable.
As to the sound, it is loud, full and round for both arco and pizz; is currently my everyday bass.
If you NYC cats have enough interest I could post some photos. I'd be curious what you think.