• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Well... this is different

I'm with @BassToGoGo. Carvin did totally, positively make stuff like the doubleneck in the OP:
View attachment 3974279
^ Depicted on the cover of their 1959 catalogue, samples of their models #4-BS (bass/Spanish) and #1-MS (mandolin/Spanish); alternatively, they could be the #5-BS and #2-MS, with non-adjustable pickups.
[Invalid or Expired Link Removed]

The control panel is at an odd location, the body shape is missing the violin-style corner,* and the lower bout is the less pronounced one that the BS had (as opposed to the MS), and so it may have been a prototype, but I'm actually thinking custom order in this case: a bass/mandolin doubler must have contacted Carvin about having a tailored instrument made, using parts that they offered anyway, albeit not in that exact configuration. Basically, Keisel ante litteram. Not surprisingly, at that!
I stand corrected. That's pretty wild!
 
I'm with @BassToGoGo. Carvin did totally, positively make stuff like the doubleneck in the OP:
View attachment 3974279
^ Depicted on the cover of their 1959 catalogue, samples of their models #4-BS (bass/Spanish) and #1-MS (mandolin/Spanish); alternatively, they could be the #5-BS and #2-MS, with non-adjustable pickups.
[Invalid or Expired Link Removed]

The control panel is at an odd location, the body shape is missing the violin-style corner,* and the lower bout is the less pronounced one that the BS had (as opposed to the MS), and so it may have been a prototype, but I'm actually thinking custom order in this case: a bass/mandolin doubler must have contacted Carvin about having a tailored instrument made, using parts that they offered anyway, albeit not in that exact configuration. Basically, Keisel ante litteram. Not surprisingly, at that!


* [Points 1 and 2 may be related: the customer may have decided they preferred having the controls up there, so the violin corner, normally out of arm's way when picking both sides on both "normal" models, would have possibly hurt when moving the hand to the controls. Or maybe (s)he just didn't like the corner.]


Speaking of Carving doublenecks: paging @RDB3, who used to own one, and is interested in vintage ultra-short-scale basses.
Ultra short scale bass round up
Yep: the bass side of the OP instrument has a scale length of 25.125".
So if this is a bonafide Carvin... and Carvin eventually morphed into Kiesel... is this thing good for metal???
 
  • Like
Reactions: HaphAsSard
I can't take "instruments" like this seriously. But, it would be strangely interesting if it actually sounded good.

the bass is short scale, and maybe you could tune it to a baritone which could be useful. Other than that, A Mandolin, and A bass would be better than this combo. What are the odds one would ever need this configuration in a live performance?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ghastly
I'm with @BassToGoGo. Carvin did totally, positively make stuff like the doubleneck in the OP:
View attachment 3974279
^ Depicted on the cover of their 1959 catalogue, samples of their models #4-BS (bass/Spanish) and #1-MS (mandolin/Spanish); alternatively, they could be the #5-BS and #2-MS, with non-adjustable pickups.
[Invalid or Expired Link Removed]

The control panel is at an odd location, the body shape is missing the violin-style corner,* and the lower bout is the less pronounced one that the BS had (as opposed to the MS), and so it may have been a prototype, but I'm actually thinking custom order in this case: a bass/mandolin doubler must have contacted Carvin about having a tailored instrument made, using parts that they offered anyway, albeit not in that exact configuration. Basically, Keisel ante litteram. Not surprisingly, at that!


* [Points 1 and 2 may be related: the customer may have decided they preferred having the controls up there, so the violin corner, normally out of arm's way when picking both sides on both "normal" models, would have possibly hurt when moving the hand to the controls. Or maybe (s)he just didn't like the corner.]


Speaking of Carving doublenecks: paging @RDB3, who used to own one, and is interested in vintage ultra-short-scale basses.
Ultra short scale bass round up
Yep: the bass side of the OP instrument has a scale length of 25.125".
yuck
 
83670080_484434509175464_7199346901655748608_o.jpg
 
Am I the only one bothered by the gigantic screws on the pickups?
The pickups during this era came from Mosrite
They're guitar pickups so only the outer poles can line up under the strings. I assume the bigger screwheads were used to get more of the center poles under the A and D strings. That doesn't explain the big screwheads under the E, but then again there's a lot I don't understand about this instrument so I should probably stop here.
 
They're guitar pickups so only the outer poles can line up under the strings. I assume the bigger screwheads were used to get more of the center poles under the A and D strings. That doesn't explain the big screwheads under the E, but then again there's a lot I don't understand about this instrument so I should probably stop here.
Carvin used the same pickups for 6 string and bass, removing two pole screws and plugging the holes with cardboard plugs. I never had problems with uneven string response. Now, finding strings for a 25.5" scale bass was another matter.

Originally Carvin used a higher tuning for their basses, with a G instead of a low E.