- Jun 30, 2010
- 49,588
- 221,962
- Disclosures
- musician/artist/owner - Gildaxe
That's a cool take on the Dano longhorn
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
I'm surprised that nobody mentioned the Gibson Thunderbird for this thread! Here's why it's wacky:
1) The reverse body shape that's an ergonomic nightmare
2) The overly long headstock
3) The 3 point bridge that makes intonation and setups a nightmare
4) No strap peg on the upper horn (because it doesn't exist in the first place!)
5) Neck dive
At least my Rics don't have any of the Thunderbird attributes I brought up!Sez' the man with a Ric in his avatar...
At least my Rics don't have any of the Thunderbird attributes I brought up!
I totally agree with you! No hard feelings here.Contentious discussions about T-birds & Ric's and those who love/dis them can only lead to thread cancelation. Best to let sleeping dogs lie brother...
In fact no but it’s more about the look than anything else. I usually prefer skinny necks and this one looks awkward to me.Do you normally play with your hand around the top of the fretboard?
I don't own one, so I couldn't tell you, but it looks to me like they would be wound the same way as the E and A tuners.
True, in fact, it’s more about the look than anything else.Just the same way as on any five string bass?
They also produced the X-702 with the same body shape but two pickups.
I owned a Guild X-702 a few years ago. Phenomenal instrument. However, I would disagree with the notion that these were mass-produced since the total of 235 X-series basses (X-701 and 702 combined) was built in 1982/83.
I thought about it but suddenly got a torticolis !Pretty surprised nobody has named the Torzal.
![]()