• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Whackiest mass-produced basses?

I'm surprised that nobody mentioned the Gibson Thunderbird for this thread! Here's why it's wacky:
1) The reverse body shape that's an ergonomic nightmare
2) The overly long headstock
3) The 3 point bridge that makes intonation and setups a nightmare
4) No strap peg on the upper horn (because it doesn't exist in the first place!)
5) Neck dive

Sez' the man with a Ric in his avatar...
 
  • Like
Reactions: GTHintz
At least my Rics don't have any of the Thunderbird attributes I brought up!

Contentious discussions about T-birds & Ric's and those who love/dis them can only lead to thread cancelation. Best to let sleeping dogs lie brother...
 
Guild X-701

oc6azpqtb5rxsilxq98y.jpg


They also produced the X-702 with the same body shape but two pickups.

Also the Guild Ashbory...

rbs7j3l0on5po5ogyfds.jpg


I have a trio of Guild Ashbory's from the '80s, one has a single digit serial number and was made without fingerboard binding.
 
Last edited:
I owned a Guild X-702 a few years ago. Phenomenal instrument. However, I would disagree with the notion that these were mass-produced since the total of 235 X-series basses (X-701 and 702 combined) was built in 1982/83.

I posted the X-701 photo in response to a previous poster in this thread who stated they couldn't find a picture of one. I don't really care if it was mass produced or not.