Suit yourselfI haven't (and am unlikely to) download and listen to the source. However, I would caution against believing the experiment as described above. It lacks (what I consider) obvious controls.
The experiment claims that after inducing a plant to grow in a direction by applying wind and light, applying only wind will cause the same effect. The most obvious controls are to repeat the experiment with plants that have not been subjected to the experimental conditions. So at a minimum, you need a plant that gets wind and light, one with light only, one with wind only, and one with no external stimulus.
Experiments are difficult because you must control all possible externalities. So much so, that published results are often criticized on the basis of controls and are often repeated with additional controls to determine if results are correct.
[edit] just to add, after having a bit of a browse, regarding the dear woman making these claims, and her methods, from Invalid Link Removed,
Gagliano’s claims are controversial. She’s received equal amounts of attention and criticism from colleagues and the media. Her work was introduced to the public in an in-depth primer on plant intelligence that came out in The New Yorker in 2013 called, Intelligent Plant. This year, Gagliano and her plant studies were featured on the popular science show,Invalid Link Removed. Notably, however, there’s been almost no criticism of the methods or results of her peer-reviewed studies. One critique of her methodology was resolved with a clarification. [emphasis added]
Last edited:
