The only "ulterior motive" Disney has is profit. As long as they make a product that people want to buy, they deserve every cent they get.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Oh, so youre for the mindless numbing of Americans for profit?
Oh, so youre for the mindless numbing of Americans for profit?
I numb my mind daily thank you very much.
Disney (or any company) has no obligation to maintain, or improve the cultural or intellectual position of our society. That is up to each person (or parent), to decide for themselves. I find most Disney products to be appropriate and safe entertainment for my kids. Educating them is a responsibility that falls on my shoulders, not some corporation.
It seems to me that people who thrive on a victim mentality will always try to label the successful as evil.
Randy hasn't posted here since they closed TPA. He was a funny guy. We miss you, steveksux...Youre still not getting it.
I really dont care about disney or what they do, in factm I agree with your post 100%, Im just in a randy mood today. And yesterday. Maybe all week, who knows?

I have fans?
I HAVE FANS!!!
I mean...thank you very much.![]()
I have fans?
I HAVE FANS!!!
I mean...thank you very much.![]()

Youre still not getting it.
I really dont care about disney or what they do, in factm I agree with your post 100%, Im just in a randy mood today. And yesterday. Maybe all week, who knows?

My bad. I'm trying to pretend I'm actually working, and not on TB, so I probably missed the implied humor as I speed-read through the thread.![]()
Well, being that he's a representative of the Catholic church, I would argue that they've done more to corrupt the human mind than Disney, simply based upon the sheer years of their existence and all the history behind the Church. However, these stories are there for children to read for themselves. If we do a good job parenting, we should read these stories to them (in non Disney) form, and let the children decide for themselves. However, being that not very many people read these days, I would say that this is a futile notion. But to argue against this dude, I would say that if he doesn't like Disney's version of Sleeping Beauty, then he should read the original one that pre-dates Grimm. It promotes adulterous incest. Replace the sleeping princess with a daughter, the prince with her father, and the evil queen with her mother. Good times.
Still, I can also see this guys point. I went to a little assembly at my son's school and each grade level had to put on a presentation. Watching a bunch of second-graders sing songs from High School Musical was pretty disturbing. Almost every performance was related to a Disney film somehow. Kind of sad. I understand that perhaps the teacher were 'over' the idea of having to put on this stupid performance every year, but to teach kids how to sing Disney songs just kind of seemed lazy.
Disney would not be in business if it didn't do what it does well. If it's going to present old stories that have traditionally been passed down through word of mouth and storytelling better than the originals, the people are going to buy it. If it doesn't then people will reject it. The only thing you can do, is make smart choices when you're a parent and raising your own kid.
The guy quoted in the article makes quite a leap of logic, IMO, going from Disney marketing merchandise with their movies to Disney trying to replace a value system. By his logic, Fender is trying to make me believe that my life will be complete if I buy some of their clothes now available at Wal-Mart, and Gibson is subborning my value system with the Guitar Hero franchise, selling me on a rock star's lifestyle that includes the Gibson family of companies.
I don't agree with his assumptions about how much influence or what variety Disney has. They're a company, no more, no less. Either he was misquoted, or he completely ignores parental influence altogether in the formation of a scoety's values.
I don't agree with his interpretation of scripture, either. I also notice that he says consumerism, and the OP used the word capitalism...they're not the same thing at all.
Oh, so youre for the mindless numbing of Americans for profit?
True, the people deserve what they get, but this in no way supports prosperity to mankind, only Disney.
Who wants to go watch an advanced copy of High School Musical 17 featuring the Last Jonas Brother and Billie Rae Cyrus, son of Miley?
The only "ulterior motive" Disney has is profit. As long as they make a product that people want to buy, they deserve every cent they get.

Disney (or any company) has no obligation to maintain, or improve the cultural or intellectual position of our society. That is up to each person (or parent), to decide for themselves. I find most Disney products to be appropriate and safe entertainment for my kids. Educating them is a responsibility that falls on my shoulders, not some corporation.
It seems to me that people who thrive on a victim mentality will always try to label the successful as evil.
), I believe they do - same as anyone else...
This is why England got rid of the Catholic church and made our own one, CoE all the way
p.s.
there is no religous hatred here, it is merely a historical joke. Thoughs British members will certainly understand it aa I'm not sure to what extend the history of the English Monarchy is taught in schools in America. If it isn't, just search for Henry VIII starting the Church of England.